Welfare, justice, child development and human rights: a review of the objects of youth justice legislation in Australia

被引:5
作者
Malvaso, Catia [1 ,2 ,6 ,7 ]
Day, Andrew [3 ]
McLachlan, Katherine [4 ]
Sarre, Rick [5 ]
Lynch, John [2 ]
Pilkington, Rhiannon [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Psychol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Publ Hlth, BetterStart Hlth & Dev, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Sch Social & Polit Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Business Govt & Law, Flinders Criminol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ South Australia, Justice & Soc, Adelaide, Australia
[6] Univ Adelaide, Sch Psychol, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[7] Univ Adelaide, Sch Publ Hlth, BetterStart Child Hlth & Dev Res Grp, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Youth justice; juvenile justice; legislation; Australia; objects;
D O I
10.1080/10345329.2024.2313784
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In Australia, as elsewhere, there is consensus that new and more effective ways of responding to young people who commit crimes need to be identified and, when available, implemented and evaluated. In this paper we review youth justice legislation across each Australian jurisdiction and consider how it provides the mandate for service delivery. We contextualise this with an account of historical variations in how the seemingly competing goals of welfare and justice have been balanced. This is followed by an overview of contemporary understandings of child development and human rights which are increasingly recognised as both relevant and important to the way in which the community works with justice-involved children and young people. The analysis illustrates how youth justice agencies are still expected to achieve multiple and, at times, conflicting legislated objectives which results in a lack of coherence in policy and practice. This serves only to limit effectiveness. We conclude that legislative reform will be necessary to realise any new vision for youth justice, especially if one of the overarching purposes is to protect vulnerable children.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 471
页数:21
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Alder C., 1994, Family conferencing and juvenile justice: The way forward or misplaced optimism, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2022, GUARDIAN 1010
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Juvenile justice: Youth and crime in Australia
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Bringing Them Home: Report of the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from their Families
[5]  
Antolak-Saper N, 2020, Law in Context A Socio-legal Journal, V37, P99, DOI 10.26826/law-in-context.v37i1.118
[6]   Reconsidering Child Saving The Extent and Correlates of Public Support for Excluding Youths From the Juvenile Court [J].
Applegate, Brandon K. ;
Davis, Robin King ;
Cullen, Francis T. .
CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 2009, 55 (01) :51-77
[7]  
Armytage P., 2017, Youth justice review and strategy: Meeting needs and reducing offending, P1
[8]  
Australian Child Rights Taskforce, 2018, CHILDRENS REPORT AUS
[9]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2022, Youth Justice in Australia 202021: AIHW
[10]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2023, YOUNG PEOPLE RETURNI