Employing a Risk Assessment Tool for Shared Decision-Making in Breast Cancer Screening

被引:1
作者
Krueger, Louisa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Coll St Scholast, Duluth, MN USA
[2] Minnesota State Univ, Sch Nursing, Mankato, MN USA
[3] Minnesota State Univ, Sch Nursing, 321 Maywood Ave,WH360, Mankato, MN 56001 USA
关键词
breast cancer; risk assessment; shared decision-making;
D O I
10.1177/10784535241228582
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: The existing guidelines for breast cancer screening incorporate assessing individual risk but contain no universally recommended risk assessment tool in the primary care setting. Local Problem: A family planning program utilizing nurses and nurse practitioners for assessment, education, and referral lacked a risk assessment tool for assessing breast cancer risk. Methods: A breast cancer risk assessment tool was implemented in practice. Interventions: The interventions involved assessing the patient's risks, providing education on risk reduction strategies, and determining the need for clinical breast exams and referrals for mammography. Results: The study demonstrated a clear correlation between the number of breast cancer risks identified and the extent of education provided to patients based on their specific risk profiles (0 vs. 1.5 risks; 2 vs. 4.6 educational components). Among patients under age 35, 80% opted for a clinical breast exam, while 100% of patients age 40 and above agreed to both clinical breast exams and referrals for mammography after discussing individual risks. Conclusions: The use of a breast cancer risk assessment tool provided an evidence-based foundation for the shared decision-making conversation between patient and nurse/provider on risk reduction. The discussion included current evidence on the risk versus benefit of age-based screening options for breast cancer, allowing for an informed decision made jointly between the patient and provider.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 28
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ensuring Informed Decision-Making for Cancer Screening
    Bradley, Stephen H.
    Thompson, Matthew J.
    Nicholson, Brian D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (02) : 435 - 438
  • [22] Does the use of shared decision-making consultation behaviors increase treatment decision-making satisfaction among Chinese women facing decision for breast cancer surgery?
    Lam, Wendy W. T.
    Kwok, Marie
    Chan, Miranda
    Hung, Wai Ka
    Ying, Marcus
    Or, Amy
    Kwong, Ava
    Suen, Dacita
    Yoon, Sungwon
    Fielding, Richard
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2014, 94 (02) : 243 - 249
  • [23] Systematic review of shared decision-making in guidelines about colorectal cancer screening
    Maes-Carballo, Marta
    Garcia-Garcia, Manuel
    Gomez-Fandino, Yolanda
    Roberto Estrada-Lopez, Carlos
    Iglesias-Alvarez, Andres
    Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora
    Saeed Khan, Khalid
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2022, 31 (06)
  • [24] LungCARE: Encouraging Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening—a Randomized Trial
    Judith M. E. Walsh
    Leah Karliner
    Ashley Smith
    Yan Leykin
    Steven E. Gregorich
    Jennifer Livaudais-Toman
    Ana I. Velazquez
    Margaret Lowenstein
    Celia P. Kaplan
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2023, 38 : 3115 - 3122
  • [25] "Shared decision-making" for prostate cancer screening: Is it a marker of quality preventative healthcare?
    Golijanin, Borivoj
    Bhatt, Vikas
    Homer, Alexander
    Malshy, Kamil
    Ochsner, Anna
    Wales, Rebecca
    Khaleel, Sari
    Mega, Anthony
    Pareek, Gyan
    Hyams, Elias
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 88
  • [26] Shared decision-making in breast cancer: discrepancy between the treatment efficacy required by patients and by physicians
    Falk C. Thiel
    Michael G. Schrauder
    Peter A. Fasching
    Christian R. Löhberg
    Mayada R. Bani
    Lothar Häberle
    Thorsten Tänzer
    Dragan Radosavac
    Anton Scharl
    Ingo Bauerfeind
    Judith Gesslein
    Hilde Schulte
    Brigitte Overbeck-Schulte
    Matthias W. Beckmann
    Michael P. Lux
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2012, 135 : 811 - 820
  • [27] The G8 frailty screening tool and the decision-making process in older breast cancer patients
    Scheepers, Ellen R. M.
    van der Molen, Loes F.
    van den Bos, Frederiek
    Burgmans, Josephine P.
    van Huis-Tanja, Lieke H.
    Hamaker, Marije E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2021, 30 (01)
  • [28] Shared decision-making in breast cancer: discrepancy between the treatment efficacy required by patients and by physicians
    Thiel, Falk C.
    Schrauder, Michael G.
    Fasching, Peter A.
    Loehberg, Christian R.
    Bani, Mayada R.
    Haeberle, Lothar
    Taenzer, Thorsten
    Radosavac, Dragan
    Scharl, Anton
    Bauerfeind, Ingo
    Gesslein, Judith
    Schulte, Hilde
    Overbeck-Schulte, Brigitte
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Lux, Michael P.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 135 (03) : 811 - 820
  • [29] Shared Decision-Making and Women's Adherence to Breast and Cervical Cancer Screenings
    Han, Jayoung
    Jungsuwadee, Paiboon
    Abraham, Olufunmilola
    Ko, Dongwoo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (07)
  • [30] Shared Decision-Making
    Wright, Linda S.
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY NURSING JOURNAL, 2022, 49 (06) : 537 - 540