Comparison of Improvement in Patient-Reported Knee Function After Revision and Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstruction Compared With Primary ACL Reconstruction

被引:1
|
作者
Kaarre, Janina [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ]
Herman, Zachary J. [1 ,3 ]
Grassi, Alberto [1 ,4 ]
Hamrin Senorski, Eric [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Musahl, Volker [1 ,3 ]
Samuelsson, Kristian [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Inst Clin Sci, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Orthopaed, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Sahlgrenska Sports Med Ctr, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[4] IRCCS Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, IIa Clin Ortoped & Traumatol, Bologna, Italy
[5] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Hlth & Rehabil, Unit Physiotherapy, Inst Neurosci & Physiol,Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Molndal, Sweden
[7] Univ Gothenburg, Inst Clin Sci, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Orthopaed, Goteborgsvagen 31, S-43180 Molndal, Sweden
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament; KOOS; Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; multiple revision; reconstruction; revision; CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; RISK-FACTORS; ANTERIOR; OUTCOMES; INJURY; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1177/23259671231217725
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a debilitating complication often requiring revision surgery. It is widely agreed upon that functional knee outcomes after revision ACLR (r-ACLR) are inferior compared with those after primary reconstruction. However, data are scarce on outcomes after multiple-revision ACLR (mr-ACLR).Purpose: To compare patient-reported knee function in terms of Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively after primary ACLR, r-ACLR, and mr-ACLR and evaluate the pre- to postoperative improvement in KOOS scores for each procedure.Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods: Patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry who underwent their index ACLR between 2005 and 2020 with a minimum age of 15 years at the time of surgery were included in this study. All patients had pre- and postoperative KOOS data. The 1-year postoperative KOOS and the pre- to postoperative changes in KOOS were assessed between patients who underwent primary ACLR and those who underwent subsequent r-ACLR and mr-ACLR.Results: Of 20,542 included patients, 19,769 (96.2%) underwent primary ACLR, 760 (3.7%) underwent r-ACLR, and 13 (0.06%) underwent mr-ACLR. Patients who underwent r-ACLR had significantly smaller pre- to postoperative changes on all KOOS subscales compared with patients undergoing primary ACLR (P < .0001 for all). Furthermore, patients in the mr-ACLR group had significantly smaller changes in the KOOS-Pain subscale compared with patients in the r-ACLR group (-9 +/- 23.3 vs 2.5 +/- 18; P = .024).Conclusion: The study results indicated that while improvement is seen after primary ACLR, r-ACLR, and mr-ACLR, the greatest improvement in functional outcomes is observed after primary ACLR. Patients who underwent at least 1 r-ACLR, specifically mr-ACLR, had lower postoperative outcome scores, indicating that primary ACLR may provide the best chance for recovery after ACL injury.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Over-the-top ACL reconstruction yields comparable outcomes to traditional ACL reconstruction in primary and revision settings: a systematic review
    Sarraj, Mohamed
    de Sa, Darren
    Shanmugaraj, Ajaykumar
    Musahl, Volker
    Lesniak, Bryson P.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2019, 27 (02) : 427 - 444
  • [32] Strategies for revision surgery after primary double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction
    Marcus Hofbauer
    Bart Muller
    Christopher D. Murawski
    Michael Baraga
    Carola Franziska van Eck
    Freddie H. Fu
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2013, 21 : 2072 - 2080
  • [33] Metal interference screw fixation combinations show high revision rates in primary hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction
    Kaarre, Janina
    Benvegnu, Neilen A.
    Engler, Ian D.
    Nazzal, Ehab M.
    Zsidai, Balint
    Senorski, Eric Hamrin
    Musahl, Volker
    Samuelsson, Kristian
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [34] Strategies for revision surgery after primary double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction
    Hofbauer, Marcus
    Muller, Bart
    Murawski, Christopher D.
    Baraga, Michael
    van Eck, Carola Franziska
    Fu, Freddie H.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2013, 21 (09) : 2072 - 2080
  • [35] Effects of Elective Revision after Breast Reconstruction on Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Zong, Amanda M.
    Leibl, Kayla E.
    Weichman, Katie E.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2025, 41 (02) : 100 - 112
  • [36] Comparison of patient-reported outcomes among those who chose ACL reconstruction or non-surgical treatment
    Ardern, C. L.
    Sonesson, S.
    Forssblad, M.
    Kvist, J.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2017, 27 (05) : 535 - 544
  • [37] Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Wright, Rick W.
    Huston, Laura J.
    Haas, Amanda K.
    Allen, Christina R.
    Anderson, Allen F.
    Cooper, Daniel E.
    DeBerardino, Thomas M.
    Dunn, Warren R.
    Lantz, Brett A.
    Mann, Barton
    Spindler, Kurt P.
    Stuart, Michael J.
    Nwosu, Samuel K.
    Albright, John P.
    Amendola, Annunziato
    Andrish, Jack T.
    Annunziata, Christopher C.
    Arciero, Robert A.
    Bach, Bernard R., Jr.
    Baker, Champ L., III
    Bartolozzi, Arthur R.
    Baumgarten, Keith M.
    Bechler, Jeffery R.
    Berg, Jeffrey H.
    Bernas, Geoffrey A.
    Brockmeier, Stephen F.
    Brophy, Robert H.
    Bush-Joseph, Charles A.
    Butler, J. Brad, V
    Campbell, John D.
    Carey, James L.
    Carpenter, James E.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Cooper, Jonathan M.
    Cox, Charles L.
    Creighton, R. Alexander
    Dahm, Diane L.
    David, Tal S.
    Flanigan, David C.
    Frederick, Robert W.
    Ganley, Theodore J.
    Garofoli, Elizabeth A.
    Gatt, Charles J., Jr.
    Gecha, Steven R.
    Giffin, James Robert
    Hame, Sharon L.
    Hannafin, Jo A.
    Harner, Christopher D.
    Harris, Norman Lindsay, Jr.
    Hechtman, Keith S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (10) : 2394 - 2401
  • [38] Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) combined with revision ACL reconstruction and lateral extra-articular tenodesis results in significantly improved outcomes, but patient-reported knee function is inferior compared to an isolated MAT
    Mitrousias, Vasileios
    Chalatsis, Georgios
    Mylonas, Theodoros
    Siouras, Athanasios
    Panteliadou, Freideriki
    Stergiadou, Stella
    Hantes, Michael
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2024, 32 (11) : 2762 - 2769
  • [39] No negative effect on patient-reported outcome of concomitant cartilage lesions 5–9 years after ACL reconstruction
    Svend Ulstein
    Karin Bredland
    Asbjørn Årøen
    Lars Engebretsen
    Jan Harald Røtterud
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2017, 25 : 1482 - 1488
  • [40] Lateral extra-articular tenodesis with ACL reconstruction demonstrates better patient-reported outcomes compared to ACL reconstruction alone at 2 years minimum follow-up
    Rowan, F. E.
    Huq, S. S.
    Haddad, F. S.
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2019, 139 (10) : 1425 - 1433