Comparison of Improvement in Patient-Reported Knee Function After Revision and Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstruction Compared With Primary ACL Reconstruction

被引:1
|
作者
Kaarre, Janina [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ]
Herman, Zachary J. [1 ,3 ]
Grassi, Alberto [1 ,4 ]
Hamrin Senorski, Eric [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Musahl, Volker [1 ,3 ]
Samuelsson, Kristian [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Inst Clin Sci, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Orthopaed, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Sahlgrenska Sports Med Ctr, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[4] IRCCS Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, IIa Clin Ortoped & Traumatol, Bologna, Italy
[5] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Hlth & Rehabil, Unit Physiotherapy, Inst Neurosci & Physiol,Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Molndal, Sweden
[7] Univ Gothenburg, Inst Clin Sci, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Orthopaed, Goteborgsvagen 31, S-43180 Molndal, Sweden
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament; KOOS; Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; multiple revision; reconstruction; revision; CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; RISK-FACTORS; ANTERIOR; OUTCOMES; INJURY; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1177/23259671231217725
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a debilitating complication often requiring revision surgery. It is widely agreed upon that functional knee outcomes after revision ACLR (r-ACLR) are inferior compared with those after primary reconstruction. However, data are scarce on outcomes after multiple-revision ACLR (mr-ACLR).Purpose: To compare patient-reported knee function in terms of Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively after primary ACLR, r-ACLR, and mr-ACLR and evaluate the pre- to postoperative improvement in KOOS scores for each procedure.Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods: Patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry who underwent their index ACLR between 2005 and 2020 with a minimum age of 15 years at the time of surgery were included in this study. All patients had pre- and postoperative KOOS data. The 1-year postoperative KOOS and the pre- to postoperative changes in KOOS were assessed between patients who underwent primary ACLR and those who underwent subsequent r-ACLR and mr-ACLR.Results: Of 20,542 included patients, 19,769 (96.2%) underwent primary ACLR, 760 (3.7%) underwent r-ACLR, and 13 (0.06%) underwent mr-ACLR. Patients who underwent r-ACLR had significantly smaller pre- to postoperative changes on all KOOS subscales compared with patients undergoing primary ACLR (P < .0001 for all). Furthermore, patients in the mr-ACLR group had significantly smaller changes in the KOOS-Pain subscale compared with patients in the r-ACLR group (-9 +/- 23.3 vs 2.5 +/- 18; P = .024).Conclusion: The study results indicated that while improvement is seen after primary ACLR, r-ACLR, and mr-ACLR, the greatest improvement in functional outcomes is observed after primary ACLR. Patients who underwent at least 1 r-ACLR, specifically mr-ACLR, had lower postoperative outcome scores, indicating that primary ACLR may provide the best chance for recovery after ACL injury.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcome 6 Years After Revision ACL Reconstruction
    Wright, Rick W.
    Huston, Laura J.
    Haas, Amanda K.
    Pennings, Jacquelyn S.
    Allen, Christina R.
    Cooper, Daniel E.
    DeBerardino, Thomas M.
    Dunn, Warren R.
    Lantz, Brett Brick A.
    Spindler, Kurt P.
    Stuart, Michael J.
    Amendola, Annunziato Ned
    Annunziata, Christopher C.
    Arciero, Robert A.
    Bach, Bernard R., Jr.
    Baker, Champ L., III
    Bartolozzi, Arthur R.
    Baumgarten, Keith M.
    Berg, Jeffrey H.
    Bernas, Geoffrey A.
    Brockmeier, Stephen F.
    Brophy, Robert H.
    Bush-Joseph, Charles A.
    Butler, J. Brad
    Carey, James L.
    Carpenter, James E.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Cooper, Jonathan M.
    Cox, Charles L.
    Creighton, R. Alexander
    David, Tal S.
    Flanigan, David C.
    Frederick, Robert W.
    Ganley, Theodore J.
    Gatt, Charles J., Jr.
    Gecha, Steven R.
    Giffin, James Robert
    Hame, Sharon L.
    Hannafin, Jo A.
    Harner, Christopher D.
    Harris, Norman Lindsay, Jr.
    Hechtman, Keith S.
    Hershman, Elliott B.
    Hoellrich, Rudolf G.
    Johnson, David C.
    Johnson, Timothy S.
    Jones, Morgan H.
    Kaeding, Christopher C.
    Kamath, Ganesh, V
    Klootwyk, Thomas E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (13) : 3286 - 3294
  • [22] Does revision ACL reconstruction measure up to primary surgery? A meta-analysis comparing patient-reported and clinician-reported outcomes, and radiographic results
    Grassi, Alberto
    Ardern, Clare L.
    Muccioli, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani
    Neri, Maria Pia
    Marcacci, Maurilio
    Zaffagnini, Stefano
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 50 (12) : 716 - 724
  • [23] Favorable Patient-Reported, Clinical, and Functional Outcomes 2 Years After ACL Repair and InternalBrace Augmentation Compared With ACL Reconstruction and Healthy Controls
    Mueller, Sebastian
    Buehl, Linda
    Nueesch, Corina
    Pagenstert, Geert
    Muendermann, Annegret
    Egloff, Christian
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (12) : 3131 - 3141
  • [24] Determining the Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for Patient-Reported Outcome Scores After Primary ACL Reconstruction
    Jeon, Young-Sik
    Lee, Ja-Woon
    Kim, Soo-Hyun
    Kim, Sang-Gyun
    Kim, Young-Ha
    Bae, Ji Hoon
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (05)
  • [25] Causes for failure of ACL reconstruction and influence of meniscectomies after revision
    Christophe Trojani
    Abderahmane Sbihi
    Patrick Djian
    Jean-François Potel
    Christophe Hulet
    Frank Jouve
    Christophe Bussière
    François-Paul Ehkirch
    Gilles Burdin
    Frédéric Dubrana
    Philippe Beaufils
    Jean-Pierre Franceschi
    Vincent Chassaing
    Philippe Colombet
    Philippe Neyret
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2011, 19 : 196 - 201
  • [26] Adolescents Have Twice the Revision Rate of Young Adults After ACL Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autograft: A Study From the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry
    Thorolfsson, Baldur
    Svantesson, Eleonor
    Snaebjornsson, Thorkell
    Sansone, Mikael
    Karlsson, Jon
    Samuelsson, Kristian
    Senorski, Eric Hamrin
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (10)
  • [27] Inferior results after revision ACL reconstructions: a comparison with primary ACL reconstructions
    Tone Gifstad
    Jon Olav Drogset
    Annja Viset
    Torbjørn Grøntvedt
    Grete Sofie Hortemo
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2013, 21 : 2011 - 2018
  • [28] Rates and Levels of Elite Sport Participation at 5 Years After Revision ACL Reconstruction
    Pinheiro, Vitor Hugo
    Jones, Mary
    Borque, Kyle A.
    Balendra, Ganesh
    White, Nathan P.
    Ball, Simon, V
    Williams, Andy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (14) : 3762 - 3769
  • [29] Rates of revision and surgeon-reported graft rupture following ACL reconstruction: early results from the New Zealand ACL Registry
    Rahardja, Richard
    Zhu, Mark
    Love, Hamish
    Clatworthy, Mark G.
    Monk, Andrew Paul
    Young, Simon W.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2020, 28 (07) : 2194 - 2202
  • [30] No difference in patient reported outcomes, laxity, and failure rate after revision ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon compared to hamstring tendon graft: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Meena, Amit
    Di Paolo, Stefano
    Grassi, Alberto
    Raj, Akshya
    Farinelli, Luca
    Hoser, Christian
    Tapasvi, Sachin
    Zaffagnini, Stefano
    Fink, Christian
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2023, 31 (08) : 3316 - 3329