Soil inorganic carbon stocks increase non-synergistically with soil organic carbon after ecological restoration practices in drylands

被引:6
|
作者
Liu, Enyuan [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Liu, Zhen [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Sun, Zhigang [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Li, Jing [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Gong, Huarui [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Peng, Jinbang [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Zhu, Ouyang [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modeling, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, CAS Engn Lab Yellow River Delta Modern Agr, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong Dongying Inst Geog Sci, Dongying 257000, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecological restoration; Edaphic factors; Meta-analysis; Soil inorganic carbon; Soil organic carbon; Temporal pattern; NATURAL VEGETATION RESTORATION; MU US DESERT; LOESS PLATEAU; GRASSLAND RESTORATION; METAANALYSIS; NORTHWEST; SEQUESTRATION; AFFORESTATION; REHABILITATION; CHRONOSEQUENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119070
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ecological restoration practices have been widely adopted to increase soil carbon stocks by improving soil organic carbon (SOC). However, the effects of these practices on the other important soil carbon component, soil inorganic carbon (SIC), remain unclear. To address this, a meta-analysis based on 45 publications and 37 sites was conducted to quantitatively assess the dynamic changes in SIC stocks due to typical restoration practices, including conversion of cropland to forest (C-F), cropland to grassland (C-G), desert to cropland (D-C), conservation agriculture (CA), and desert to forest (D-F). Results showed that, among the restoration practices increasing the SOC stocks, the SIC stocks decreased after the C-F (-34.7%) and C-G (-15.8%) conversions and CA (-6.8%), but increased after the conversion of D-C (2.6%) and D-F (46.9%). Additionally, in terms of recovery duration, the negative effect of C-G on SIC stocks may vanish with increased recovery duration, whereas SIC stocks showed a prominent increase initially after CA and then decreased over time; the response to D-F conversion of SIC stocks remained consistently positive over time. Furthermore, the non-synergistic changes with SIC and SOC could be due to variations in edaphic factors, while the effects edaphic factors on SIC stocks were different under various ecological restoration practices. Among all the impact factors, mean annual temperature, initial SIC stocks, and types of ecological restoration practice, were the most crucial factors explaining the variation in SIC stocks with ecological restoration. Collectively, the results highlight that the change in SIC stocks is asynchronous with the increase in SOC stocks in space and time after ecological restoration, further indicating that changes in SIC stocks should be paid more attention when assessing and predicting carbon sequestration following various ecological restoration practices.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Soil organic carbon stocks in an investigated watershed transect linked to ecological restoration practices on the Loess Plateau
    Huang, Yanzhang
    Xin, Zhongbao
    Hou, Jian
    Li, Zongshan
    Yang, Lei
    Yuan, Hedi
    Majid, Abdul
    Land Degradation and Development, 2021, 32 (03): : 1148 - 1163
  • [2] Soil organic carbon stocks in an investigated watershed transect linked to ecological restoration practices on the Loess Plateau
    Huang, Yanzhang
    Xin, Zhongbao
    Hou, Jian
    Li, Zongshan
    Yang, Lei
    Yuan, Hedi
    Majid, Abdul
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 32 (03) : 1148 - 1163
  • [3] Stratification ratio of soil organic carbon as an indicator of carbon sequestration and soil quality in ecological restoration
    Xu, Mingxiang
    Wang, Zheng
    Zhao, Yunge
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2018, 26 (03) : 555 - 562
  • [4] Management Practices Affect Soil Organic Carbon Stocks and Soil Fertility in Cactus Orchards
    Coelho, Diego de Lima
    Dubeux Jr, Jose Carlos Batista
    dos Santos, Mercia Virginia Ferreira
    de Mello, Alexandre Carneiro Leao
    da Cunha, Marcio Vieira
    dos Santos, Djalma Cordeiro
    de Freitas, Erinaldo Viana
    Santos, Erick Rodrigo da Silva
    da Silva, Natalia Viana
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (12):
  • [5] Grazing exclusion significantly reduced soil organic carbon stocks but enhanced soil inorganic carbon stocks in desert steppe of northwest China
    Zhao, Guangxing
    Zhang, Zhihao
    Tariq, Akash
    Sabit, Rapkat
    Sardans, Jordi
    Graciano, Corina
    Li, Xiangyi
    Zhu, Yuhe
    Penuelas, Josep
    Al-Bakre, Dhafer A.
    Zeng, Fanjiang
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2025, 172
  • [6] Impact of soil erosion on soil organic carbon stocks
    Olson, Kenneth R.
    Al-Kaisi, Mandi
    Lal, Rattan
    Cihacek, Larry
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2016, 71 (03) : 61A - 67A
  • [7] Effects of land clearing for agriculture on soil organic carbon stocks in drylands: A meta-analysis
    Wang, Yuangang
    Luo, Geping
    Li, Chaofan
    Ye, Hui
    Shi, Haiyang
    Fan, Binbin
    Zhang, Wenqiang
    Zhang, Chen
    Xie, Mingjuan
    Zhang, Yu
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2023, 29 (02) : 547 - 562
  • [8] Carbon Soil Storage and Technologies to Increase Soil Carbon Stocks in the South American Savanna
    Castellano, Gabriel Ribeiro
    Santos, Landerlei Almeida
    Menegario, Amauri Antonio
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [9] Mapping the distribution and magnitude of soil inorganic and organic carbon stocks across Australia
    Ng, Wartini
    Padarian, Jose
    Dobarco, Mercedes Roman
    Minasny, Budiman
    Mcbratney, Alex B.
    GEODERMA, 2025, 456
  • [10] Soil salinity decreases global soil organic carbon stocks
    Setia, Raj
    Gottschalk, Pia
    Smith, Pete
    Marschner, Petra
    Baldock, Jeff
    Setia, Deepika
    Smith, Jo
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 465 : 267 - 272