Efficacy and safety of intranasal agents for the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:7
作者
Li, Guanglu [1 ,2 ]
Duan, Shaojie [3 ]
Zhu, Tiantian [4 ]
Ren, Zhiying [1 ,2 ]
Xia, Hui [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Ziyao [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Lei [2 ]
Liu, Zunjing [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chinese Med, Grad Sch Beijing, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Dept Neurol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Taizhou Univ Hosp, Taizhou Cent Hosp, Dept Geriatr, Taizhou, Peoples R China
[4] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tiantan Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ, Dept Neurol, Peoples Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Migraine; Acute treatment; Intranasal agents; Network meta-analysis; SUMATRIPTAN NASAL SPRAY; SOCIETY EVIDENCE ASSESSMENT; DOUBLE-BLIND; PERMEATION ENHANCER; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; DRUG-THERAPY; PLACEBO; DELIVERY; PHARMACOKINETICS; POWDER;
D O I
10.1186/s10194-023-01662-6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIntranasal agents may be ideal for the treatment of migraine patients. Many new acute intranasal-specific therapies have been developed, but few of them have been directly compared. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and safety of various intranasal agents for the treatment of acute migraine in adult patients.MethodsThe Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and PubMed were searched from inception to 15 August 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using intranasal agents (no restrictions on dose, formulation, dosing regimen or timing of the first dose) to treat adult patients with acute migraine were included. The primary efficacy endpoint was pain freedom at 2 h, and the primary safety endpoint was adverse events (AEs). The analysis process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.ResultsNineteen studies (21 RCTs, 9738 participants) were included. Compared to the placebo, 5 mg of zolmitriptan using a conventional liquid nasal spray device was the most effective for pain freedom at 2 h [odds ratio (OR): 4.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.43 to 6.43] and 24 h (OR: 5.49, 95% CI: 3.58 to 8.42) among all the interventions. Butorphanol nasal spray 1 mg was the most effective (OR: 8.62, 95% CI: 1.11 to 66.92) for pain freedom at 1 h, but with low-quality evidence. DFN-02 presented the highest freedom from nausea (OR: 4.95, 95% CI: 1.29 to 19.01) and phonophobia (OR: 5.36, 95% CI: 1.67 to 17.22) at 2 h, albeit with lower odds of achieving complete pain freedom. ROX-828 showed the highest improvement in freedom from photophobia at 2 h (OR: 4.03, 95% CI: 1.66 to 9.81). Dihydroergotamine nasal spray was significantly associated with the highest risk of AEs (OR: 9.65, 95% CI: 4.39 to 21.22) and was not recommended for routine use. Zavegepant nasal spray demonstrated the lowest risk of AEs (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.37 to 3.03). The results of sensitivity analyses for the primary endpoints (pain freedom at 2 h and AEs) were generally consistent with those of the base case model.ConclusionsCompared with other new intranasal-specific therapies in treating migraine attacks, zolmitriptan nasal spray 5 mg was the most effective agent for pain freedom at 2 h. Zavegepant nasal spray 10 mg had the fewest adverse side effects.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Migraine
    Ashina, Messoud
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 383 (19) : 1866 - 1876
  • [2] MAP0004, Orally Inhaled DHE: A Randomized, Controlled Study in the Acute Treatment of Migraine
    Aurora, Sheena K.
    Silberstein, Stephen D.
    Kori, Shashidhar H.
    Tepper, Stewart J.
    Borland, Scott W.
    Wang, Min
    Dodick, David W.
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2011, 51 (04): : 507 - 517
  • [3] A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of MAP0004 in Adult Patients With Migraine
    Aurora, Sheena K.
    Rozen, Todd D.
    Kori, Shashidhar H.
    Shrewsbury, Stephen B.
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2009, 49 (06): : 826 - 837
  • [4] Gastric stasis in migraine: More than just a paroxysmal abnormality during a migraine attack
    Aurora, SK
    Kori, SH
    Barrodale, P
    McDonald, SA
    Haseley, D
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2006, 46 (01): : 57 - 63
  • [5] Zolmitriptan for acute migraine attacks in adults
    Bird, Sarah
    Derry, Sheena
    Moore, R. Andrew
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (05):
  • [6] Cost of healthcare for patients with migraine in five European countries: results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS)
    Bloudek, L. M.
    Stokes, M.
    Buse, D. C.
    Wilcox, T. K.
    Lipton, R. B.
    Goadsby, P. J.
    Varon, S. F.
    Blumenfeld, A. M.
    Katsarava, Z.
    Pascual, J.
    Lanteri-Minet, M.
    Cortelli, P.
    Martelletti, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2012, 13 (05) : 361 - 378
  • [7] Intranasal Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain: A Phase 3, Double-blind, Randomized Study
    Brown, Colin
    Moodie, John
    Bisley, Eileen
    Bynum, Lincoln
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2009, 10 (06) : 1106 - 1114
  • [8] A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Breath Powered Nasal Delivery of Sumatriptan Powder (AVP-825) in the Treatment of Acute Migraine (The TARGET Study)
    Cady, Roger K.
    McAllister, Peter J.
    Spierings, Egilius L. H.
    Messina, John
    Carothers, Jennifer
    Djupesland, Per G.
    Mahmoud, Ramy A.
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2015, 55 (01): : 88 - 100
  • [9] Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA
    Chaimani, Anna
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Mavridis, Dimitris
    Spyridonos, Panagiota
    Salanti, Georgia
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (10):
  • [10] Speed of onset and zolmitriptan nasal efficacy of spray in the acute treatment of migraine -: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study versus zolmitriptan tablet
    Charlesworth, BR
    Dowson, AJ
    Purdy, A
    Becker, WJ
    Boes-Hansen, S
    Färkkilä, M
    [J]. CNS DRUGS, 2003, 17 (09) : 653 - 667