Survival and Complications of Single Dental Implants in the Edentulous Mandible following Immediate or Delayed Loading: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

被引:1
作者
Nagar, Priya [1 ]
Yadav, Krishan [2 ]
Feroz, Shaikh Mohammad Abdul [3 ]
Gangadharappa, Praveen [3 ]
Gupta, Utkarsh [4 ]
Loganathan, Jeevanandam [5 ]
机构
[1] PGIDS Rohtak, Dept Prosthodont, Rohtak, Haryana, India
[2] Rajasthan Dent Coll & Hosp, NH 8 Bagru Khurd,Ajmer Rd, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
[3] Jazan Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthet Dent Sci, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
[4] Maharana Pratap Coll Dent & Res Ctr, Dept Prosthodont Crown Bridge & Implantol, Gwalior, MP, India
[5] Pondicherry Univ, Mahatma Gandhi Post Grad Inst Dent Sci, Dept Prosthodont, Pondicherry, India
关键词
Delayed loading; edentulous mandible; implant; OVERDENTURES;
D O I
10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_554_22
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Introduction: The lifespan of an edentulous mandible with one median implant to hold a full denture for 24 months was evaluated to see if the early loading had any impact on it. Single-implant denture retention for the mandibular region was proposed by "Cordioli et al. in the 1990s. Objectives: Whether rapid loading and placement of a "single median implant" may result in the implant survival rate comparable to rehabilitation with a single implant and second-stage surgery. Methods: It was found that 81 of the 158 implant recipients had quick loading, whereas the rest had delayed loading (77 patients). Patients in the context of "delayed loading group" had follow-up appointments at 1 month, 4 months, 12 months, and 24 months. In addition, the nine implants failed in the 3 months after loading in a quick loading group, while just one implant failed before loading. Median implant survival at 2 years was the study's main goal. Direct loading had a 7% fatality rate advantage over traditional loading because of the alleged advantages of immediate loading, including the avoidance of second-stage surgery. Prosthetic problems were evaluated using Fisher's exact test. Results: A higher rate of implant survival was not seen when implants were loaded more quickly (P = 0.81). A statistically significant difference (P = 0.019) was seen in implant survival between the therapy groups. Conclusion: Single implant loading in an edentulous mandible has a worse survival rate than delayed loading, according to all available research.
引用
收藏
页码:S490 / S494
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Alsabeeha Nabeel, 2010, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V12 Suppl 1, pe28, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00152.x
[2]   Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems [J].
Alsabeeha, Nabeel H. M. ;
Payne, Alan G. T. ;
De Silva, Rohana K. ;
Thomson, W. Murray .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (03) :330-337
[3]  
Andreiotelli M, 2010, INT J PROSTHODONT, V23, P195
[4]   A 5-Year Randomized Trial to Compare 1 or 2 Implants for Implant Overdentures [J].
Bryant, S. R. ;
Walton, J. N. ;
MacEntee, M. I. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2015, 94 (01) :36-43
[5]   Patient satisfaction and masticatory efficiency of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the stud and magnetic attachments [J].
Cheng, Tao ;
Sun, Guifeng ;
Huo, Jingyu ;
He, Xiaoji ;
Wang, Yining ;
Ren, Yan-Fang .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2012, 40 (11) :1018-1023
[6]   Single unit attachments improve peri-implant soft tissue conditions in mandibular overdentures supported by four implants [J].
Cordaro, Luca ;
di Torresanto, Vincenzo Mirisola ;
Petricevic, Nikola ;
Jornet, Primitivo Roig ;
Torsello, Ferruccio .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (05) :536-542
[7]   Mandibular overdentures anchored to single implants: A five-year prospective study [J].
Cordioli, C ;
Majzoub, Z ;
Castagna, S .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1997, 78 (02) :159-165
[8]  
Cordioli G P, 1993, Minerva Stomatol, V42, P469
[9]  
Cune M, 2010, INT J PROSTHODONT, V23, P310
[10]   The emotional effects of tooth loss in edentulous people [J].
Fiske, J ;
Davis, DM ;
Frances, C ;
Gelbier, S .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1998, 184 (02) :90-93