Microbial risk assessment for underground hydrogen storage in porous rocks

被引:16
作者
Thaysen, Eike M. [1 ,2 ]
Armitage, Timothy [1 ]
Slabon, Lubica [1 ]
Hassanpouryouzband, Aliakbar [1 ]
Edlmann, Katriona [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Grant Inst, Sch Geosci, Kings Bldg,James Hutton Rd, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, Scotland
[2] Inst Environm Assessment & Water Res IDAEA, Spanish Council Sci Res CSIC, Dept Geosci, Severo Ochoa Excellence Ctr, Jordi Girona 18-26, Barcelona 08034, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 英国科研创新办公室; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Hydrogen; Geological storage; Adverse microbial effects; Risk analysis; Renewable energy production centres; Site selection; SANDSTONE; BACTERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128852
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Geological hydrogen storage, e.g. in depleted gas fields (DGF), can overcome imbalances between supply and demand in the renewable energy sector and facilitate the transition to a low carbon emissions society. A range of subsurface microorganisms utilise hydrogen, which may have important implications for hydrogen recovery, clogging and corrosion. We gathered temperature and salinity data for 75 DGF on the UK continental shelf and mapped their suitability for hydrogen storage in terms of the risk of adverse microbial effects, based on a novel collection of microbial growth constraints. Data on wind and solar operational capacities as well as offshore gas and condensate pipeline infrastructure were overlaid on the microbial risk categorization to optimize geographical centers of green hydrogen production, transport infrastructure and underground storage. We recommend storing hydrogen in 9 DGF that are at no microbial risk due to temperatures > 122 degrees C, or in the 35 low-risk DGF with temperatures > 90 degrees C. We recommend against utilising high-risk DGF with temperatures < 55 <degrees>C (9 DGF). Alignment with centers for renewable energy production and out-of-use pipelines suitable for repurposing to transport hydrogen suggests that no-risk and low-risk DGF in the Southern North Sea are the most suitable candidates for hydrogen storage. Our results advise site selection choices in geological hydrogen storage in the UK. Our methodology is applicable to any underground porous rock system globally.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] Ahn A.C., 2022, H2020 HYUSPRE PROJEC, P35
  • [2] [Anonymous], NATL GRID DATASETS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, BP STAT REV WORLD EN
  • [4] Characterization by culture and molecular analysis of the microbial diversity of a deep subsurface gas storage aquifer
    Basso, Odile
    Lascourreges, Jean-Francois
    Le Borgne, Francois
    Le Goff, Cyril
    Magot, Michel
    [J]. RESEARCH IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 160 (02) : 107 - 116
  • [5] Bauer S., 2017, UNDERGROUND SUN
  • [6] Critical Knowledge Gaps for Understanding Water-Rock-Working Phase Interactions for Compressed Energy Storage in Porous Formations
    Beckingham, Lauren E.
    Winningham, Lauren
    [J]. ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2020, 8 (01) : 2 - 11
  • [7] BEIS, 2022, BRIT EN SEC STRAT AP
  • [8] Sulfur cycling and methanogenesis primarily drive microbial colonization of the highly sulfidic Urania deep hypersaline basin
    Borin, Sara
    Brusetti, Lorenzo
    Mapelli, Francesca
    D'Auria, Giuseppe
    Brusa, Tullio
    Marzorati, Massimo
    Rizzi, Aurora
    Yakimov, Michail
    Marty, Danielle
    De Lange, Gert J.
    Van der Wielen, Paul
    Bolhuis, Henk
    McGenity, Terry J.
    Polymenakou, Paraskevi N.
    Malinverno, Elisa
    Giuliano, Laura
    Corselli, Cesare
    Daffonchio, Daniele
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (23) : 9151 - 9156
  • [9] Necromass as a Limited Source of Energy for Microorganisms in Marine Sediments
    Bradley, James A.
    Amend, Jan P.
    LaRowe, Douglas E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2018, 123 (02) : 577 - 590
  • [10] Techno-Economic Analysis of On-Site Energy Storage Units to Mitigate Wind Energy Curtailment: A Case Study in Scotland
    Canbulat, Seda
    Balci, Kutlu
    Canbulat, Onder
    Bayram, I. Safak
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (06)