How do firms build dynamic capabilities to develop sustainable products? A multiple case study in the manufacturing industry

被引:6
作者
Kortus, Lukas [1 ]
Gutmann, Tobias [1 ]
机构
[1] EBS Univ Wirtschaft & Recht, Rheingaustr 1, D-65375 Oestrich Winkel, Germany
关键词
Sustainable product development; Dynamic capabilities; Corporate sustainability; Manufacturing; Microfoundations; Multiple case study; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; CIRCULAR ECONOMY; ECODESIGN TOOLS; INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES; COMPANIES; DESIGN; MICROFOUNDATIONS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137887
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In response to mounting pressure for organizations to meet sustainability requirements and improve their environmental footprint, companies are increasingly tasked with adapting their product portfolios to include environmentally sustainable solutions. However, little research has explored how firms develop the capabilities necessary to achieve this goal. In particular, there is a gap in understanding the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities-the specific skills, processes, and organizational activities-that enable firms to simultaneously pursue business objectives and environmental requirements during product development cycles. To address this gap, we conducted a multiple case study of 19 established manufacturing firms to examine the dynamic capabilities involved in developing environmentally sustainable products. Our findings reveal a dynamic process of profiting from environmentally sustainable product development and identify several microfoundations that enable these dynamic capabilities. For scholars, this study provides a detailed analysis of why and how microfoundations of dynamic capabilities support environmentally sustainable product development. We show that implementing these becomes a continuous process of strategic renewal for an organization. For manufacturing practitioners, our study provides a blueprint for initiating and enabling strategic activities for environmentally sustainable product development.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 97 条
  • [11] On the drivers of eco-innovation: empirical evidence from China
    Cai, Wu-gan
    Zhou, Xiao-liang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 79 : 239 - 248
  • [12] Does the development of environmental innovation require different resources? Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms
    Cainelli, Giulio
    De Marchi, Valentina
    Grandinetti, Roberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 94 : 211 - 220
  • [13] Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies
    Carrillo-Hermosilla, Javier
    del Rio, Pablo
    Konnola, Totti
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (10-11) : 1073 - 1083
  • [14] Unleashing the convergence amid digitalization and sustainability towards pursuing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A holistic review
    Castro, Gema Del Rio
    Fernandez, Maria Camino Gonzalez
    Colsa, Angel Uruburu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 280
  • [15] Ceschin F., 2019, Design for Sustainability: A Multi-level Framework From Products to Socio-technical Systems, DOI [10.4324/9780429456510, DOI 10.4324/9780429456510]
  • [16] The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance
    Chan, Hing Kai
    Yee, Rachel W. Y.
    Dai, Jing
    Lim, Ming K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2016, 181 : 384 - 391
  • [17] Charter Martin., 2001, SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION
  • [18] Corbin J., 2014, Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, V4th ed, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781452230153
  • [19] Organizational capabilities towards corporate sustainability benefits: A systematic literature review and an integrative framework proposal
    da Cunha Bezerra, Maria Clara
    Gohr, Claudia Fabiana
    Morioka, Sandra Naomi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 247
  • [20] How open is innovation? A retrospective and ideas forward
    Dahlander, Linus
    Gann, David M.
    Wallin, Martin W.
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2021, 50 (04)