Exploring variation in the fecal microbial communities of Kasaragod Dwarf and Holstein crossbred cattle

被引:6
作者
Deepthi, M. [1 ]
Arvind, Kumar [1 ]
Saxena, Rituja [2 ]
Pulikkan, Joby [1 ]
Sharma, Vineet K. K. [2 ]
Grace, Tony [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Univ Kerala, Sch Biol Sci, Dept Genom Sci, Kasaragod 671316, Kerala, India
[2] Indian Inst Sci Educ & Res, Dept Biol Sci, Metagen & Syst Biol Grp, Bhopal 462066, Madhya Pradesh, India
来源
ANTONIE VAN LEEUWENHOEK INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL AND MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY | 2023年 / 116卷 / 01期
关键词
Fecal microbiome; Holstein crossbred cattle; Kasaragod Dwarf cattle; Microbial community; Microbiota; GUT MICROBIOME; EFFICIENCY; HEALTH; ENERGY; DIVERSITY; DIGESTION; DIET;
D O I
10.1007/s10482-022-01791-z
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The gut microbiota and its impact on health and nutrition in animals, including cattle has been of intense interest in recent times. Cattle, in particular indigenous varieties like Kasaragod Dwarf cow, have not received the due consideration given to other non-native cattle breeds, and the composition of their fecal microbiome is yet to be established. This study applied 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing of fecal samples and compared the Kasaragod Dwarf with the highly prevalent Holstein crossbred cattle. Variation in their microbial composition was confirmed by marker gene-based taxonomic analysis. Principle Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) showed the distinct microbial architecture of the two cattle types. While the two cattle types possess unique signature taxa, in Kasaragod Dwarf cattle, many of the identified genera, including Anaerovibrio, Succinivibrio, Roseburia, Coprococcus, Paludibacter, Sutterella, Coprobacillus, and Ruminobacter, have previously been shown to be present in higher abundance in animals with higher feed efficiency. This is the first report of Kasaragod Dwarf cattle fecal microbiome profiling. Our findings highlight the predominance of specific taxa potentially associated with different fermentation products and feed efficiency phenotypes in Kasaragod Dwarf cattle compared to Holstein crossbred cattle.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 65
页数:13
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Dynamic progression of the calf's microbiome and its influence on host health
    Amin, Nida
    Seifert, Jana
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 19 (19): : 989 - 1001
  • [2] Anilkumar K., 2003, DWARF CATTLE BUFFALO, P9
  • [3] Feed conversion efficiency in dairy cows: Repeatability, variation in digestion and metabolism of energy and nitrogen, and ruminal methanogens
    Arndt, C.
    Powell, J. M.
    Aguerre, M. J.
    Crump, P. M.
    Wattiaux, M. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (06) : 3938 - 3950
  • [4] Identification of Microbial Genetic Capacities and Potential Mechanisms Within the Rumen Microbiome Explaining Differences in Beef Cattle Feed Efficiency
    Auffret, Marc D.
    Stewart, Robert D.
    Dewhurst, Richard J.
    Duthie, Carol-Anne
    Watson, Mick
    Roehe, Rainer
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [5] Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of ruminants
    Ben Shabat, Sheerli Kruger
    Sasson, Goor
    Doron-Faigenboim, Adi
    Durman, Thomer
    Yaacoby, Shamay
    Miller, Margret E. Berg
    White, Bryan A.
    Shterzer, Naama
    Mizrahi, Itzhak
    [J]. ISME JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (12) : 2958 - 2972
  • [6] Gut microbiome composition differences among breeds impact feed efficiency in swine
    Bergamaschi, Matteo
    Tiezzi, Francesco
    Howard, Jeremy
    Huang, Yi Jian
    Gray, Kent A.
    Schillebeeckx, Constantino
    McNulty, Nathan P.
    Maltecca, Christian
    [J]. MICROBIOME, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [7] Metabolic diversity of the intestinal microbiota: Implications for health and disease
    Blaut, Michael
    Clavel, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2007, 137 (03) : 751S - 755S
  • [8] QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data
    Caporaso, J. Gregory
    Kuczynski, Justin
    Stombaugh, Jesse
    Bittinger, Kyle
    Bushman, Frederic D.
    Costello, Elizabeth K.
    Fierer, Noah
    Pena, Antonio Gonzalez
    Goodrich, Julia K.
    Gordon, Jeffrey I.
    Huttley, Gavin A.
    Kelley, Scott T.
    Knights, Dan
    Koenig, Jeremy E.
    Ley, Ruth E.
    Lozupone, Catherine A.
    McDonald, Daniel
    Muegge, Brian D.
    Pirrung, Meg
    Reeder, Jens
    Sevinsky, Joel R.
    Tumbaugh, Peter J.
    Walters, William A.
    Widmann, Jeremy
    Yatsunenko, Tanya
    Zaneveld, Jesse
    Knight, Rob
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2010, 7 (05) : 335 - 336
  • [9] The Chimeric Genome of Sphaerochaeta: Nonspiral Spirochetes That Break with the Prevalent Dogma in Spirochete Biology
    Caro-Quintero, A.
    Ritalahti, K. M.
    Cusick, K. D.
    Loeffler, F. E.
    Konstantinidis, K. T.
    [J]. MBIO, 2012, 3 (03):
  • [10] Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles
    Choo, Jocelyn M.
    Leong, Lex E. X.
    Rogers, Geraint B.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5