Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbial mixtures offered to beef cattle consuming finishing diets on intake, nutrient digestibility, feeding behavior, and ruminal kinetics/fermentation profile

被引:2
|
作者
Silva, Kaliu G. Scaranto [1 ]
Sarturi, Jhones O. [1 ]
Johnson, Bradley J. [1 ]
Woerner, Dale R. [1 ]
Lopez, Alejandra M. [1 ]
Rodrigues, Barbara M. [2 ]
Nardi, Kaue T. [1 ]
Rush, Camron J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Anim & Food Sci, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] Texas A&M AgriLife Res, Ctr Nat Resource Technol Informat, College Stn, TX 77840 USA
关键词
B; subtilis; licheniformis; digestibility; L; animalis; P; freudenreichii; ruminal kinetics; NEUTRAL DETERGENT FIBER; RUMEN FERMENTATION; FEEDLOT CATTLE; AMINO-ACIDS; SUPPLEMENTATION; PERFORMANCE; CORN; WET; DIGESTION; ACIDOSIS;
D O I
10.1093/jas/skae003
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbial (DFM) mixtures on intake, nutrient digestibility, feeding behavior, ruminal fermentation profile, and ruminal degradation kinetics of beef steers were evaluated. Crossbred Angus ruminally cannulated steers (n = 6; body weight [BW] = 520 +/- 30 kg) were used in a duplicated 3 x 3 Latin square design and offered a steam-flaked corn-based finisher diet to ad libitum intake for 3, 28-d periods. Treatments were 1) Control (no DFM, lactose carrier only); 2) Treat-A (Lactobacillus animalis, Propionibacterium freudenreichii, Bacillus subtilis, and Bacillus licheniformis), at 1:1:1:3 ratio, respectively; totaling 6 x 10(9) CFU (50 mg)/animal-daily minimum; and 3) Treat-B, the same DFM combination, but doses at 1:1:3:1 ratio. Bacterial counts were similar to 30% greater than the minimum expected. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS with the model including the fixed effect of treatment and the random effects of square, period, and animal (square). For repeated measure variables, the fixed effects of treatment, time, and their interaction, and the random effects of square, period, animal (square), and animal (treatment) were used. Preplanned contrasts comparing Control x Treat-A or Treat-B were performed. Intake and major feeding behavior variables were not affected (P >= 0.17) by treatments. Steers offered Treat-A had an increased (P = 0.04) ADF digestibility compared with Control. Steers offered Treat-A experienced daily 300 min less (P = 0.04) time under ruminal pH 5.6, a greater (P = 0.04) ruminal pH average and NH3-N concentration (P = 0.05) and tended (P = 0.06) to have a lower ruminal temperature compared to Control. Ruminal VFA was not affected (P >= 0.38) by treatments. Steers offered Treat-A increased (P = 0.02) and tended (P = 0.08) to increase the ruminal effective degradable NDF and ADF fractions of the diet-substrate, respectively. When the forage-substrate (low quality) was incubated, steers offered Treat-A tended (P = 0.09) to increase the effective degradable hemicellulose fraction compared to Control. In this experiment, the bacterial combinations did not affect intake and feeding behavior, while the combination with a greater proportion of B. licheniformis (Treat-A) elicited an improved core-fiber digestibility and a healthier ruminal pH pattern, in which the ruminal environment showed to be more prone to induce the effective degradability of fiber fractions, while also releasing more NH3-N. During the finishing phase, a high-energy diet offers benefits related to beef cattle growth and development. However, it is essential to acknowledge that finisher diets are energy-dense and can pose digestive challenges, such as subacute ruminal acidosis. Digestive disturbances negatively affect animal well-being, growth performance, and economic returns. To address digestive challenges endured by animals on high-energy diets, the current experiment focused on the addition of bacterial direct-fed microbial (DFM) mixtures. A unique combination of bacterial DFM containing Lactobacillus animalis, Propionibacterium freudenreichii, Bacillus subtilis, and Bacillus licheniformis was evaluated. These bacteria have been individually reported to improve cattle nutrient utilization, digestibility, ruminal function, and maintain ruminal pH. The study aimed to investigate the effects of this specific microbial combination and doses when added to beef cattle finisher diets. The DFM mixtures offered seemed to not affect intake and major feeding behavior variables. The DFM combination containing a greater proportion of B. licheniformis (Treat-A) seemed to elicit an improved total tract core-fiber digestibility, and a safer ruminal pH pattern. The ruminal environment was shown to be more prone to improve the ruminal effective degradability of fiber fractions, while also releasing more NH3-N.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Effects of Non Forage Fiber Sources in Total Mixed Ration on Feed Intake, Nutrient Digestibility, Chewing Behavior and Ruminal Fermentation in Beef Cattle
    Chumpawadee, S.
    Pimpa, O.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND VETERINARY ADVANCES, 2009, 8 (10): : 2038 - 2044
  • [33] Influence of feeding direct-fed microbial supplementation on growth performance and feeding behavior in naturally fed and conventionally fed finishing cattle with different dietary adaptation periods
    Swanson, Kendall C.
    Gaspers, James J.
    Keomanivong, Faithe A.
    Gilbery, Trent C.
    Lardy, Gregory P.
    Bauer, Marc L.
    Stokka, Gerald L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 (08) : 3370 - 3380
  • [34] Ruminal degradation kinetics, intake, digestibility, and feeding behavior of beef steers offered annual or perennial grass-hay with or without supplementation
    Sugg, Joel D.
    Sarturi, Jhones O.
    Henry, Darren D.
    Ciriaco, Francine M.
    West, Charles P.
    Ballou, Michael A.
    Hoffmann, Carly A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 99 (08)
  • [35] Effects of supplementation of isoquinoline alkaloids and monensin on microbial protein synthesis, ruminal fermentation and nutrient digestibility in steers fed a finishing diet.
    Rogge, H. I.
    Aguilar-Hernandez, J. A.
    Morin-Luogo, S.
    Urias-Estrada, J. D.
    Soto, M. A. Lopez
    Barreras, A.
    Gonzalez-Vizcarra, V.
    Plascencia, A.
    Zinn, R. A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 678 - 679
  • [36] Effect of Fodder Tree as Fiber Sources in Total Mixed Ration on Feed Intake, Nutrient Digestibility, Chewing Behavior and Ruminal Fermentation in Beef Cattle
    Chumpawadee, S.
    Pimpa, O.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND VETERINARY ADVANCES, 2009, 8 (07): : 1279 - 1284
  • [37] Effects of Non-ionic Surfactant Supplementation on Ruminal Fermentation, Nutrient Digestibility and Performance of Beef Steers Fed High-roughage Diets
    Ahn, Gyu-chul
    Kim, Jeong-hoon
    Park, Eun-kyu
    Oh, Young-kyoon
    Lee, Gang-yeon
    Lee, Jung-il
    Kim, Chong-min
    Park, Keun-kyu
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2009, 22 (07): : 993 - 1004
  • [38] Effect of including high-lipid by-product pellets in substitution for barley grain and canola meal in finishing diets for beef cattle on ruminal fermentation and nutrient digestibility
    Gorka, P.
    Castillo-Lopez, E.
    Joy, F.
    Chibisa, G. E.
    McKinnon, J. J.
    Penner, G. B.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2015, 93 (10) : 4891 - 4902
  • [39] Comparative effects of two multi-species direct-fed microbial products on rumen fermentation, bacterial community and metabolome of beef steers
    Ogunade, Ibukun M.
    Compart, Devan M.
    Pech-Cervantes, Andres A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 : 398 - 398
  • [40] Effects of calcium ammonium nitrate fed to dairy cows on nutrient intake and digestibility, milk quality, microbial protein synthesis, and ruminal fermentation parameters
    Almeida, V. K.
    Santos, G. T.
    Daniel, J. L. P.
    Osorio, J. A. C.
    Yamada, K. L. G.
    Sippert, M. R.
    Cabral, J. F.
    Marchi, F. E.
    Araujo, R. C.
    Vyas, D.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 (03) : 2228 - 2241