Optimization of Collective Irrigation Network Layout through the Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Multicriteria Analysis Method

被引:4
作者
Gonzalez-Pavon, Cesar [1 ]
Palau, Carmen Virginia [2 ]
Juarez, Juan Manzano [2 ]
Estruch-Guitart, Vicente [3 ]
Guillem-Pico, Santiago [2 ]
Balbastre-Peralta, Iban [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Valencia, Dept Fis Aplicada, Cami Vera S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Valencia, Ctr Valenciano Estudios Riego CVER, Cami Vera S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain
[3] Univ Politecn Valencia, Dept Econ & Ciencies Socials, Edifici 3P,Cami Vera S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain
关键词
irrigation network; AHP; GIS; Dijkstra; resistance; LOCATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3390/w16030370
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
On numerous occasions, we often have very little information or must make a decision considering qualitative aspects that are difficult to evaluate. This study focuses on obtaining objective criteria to assist in decision-making in the design phase of pressurized water pipes in collective irrigation networks. In the layout of these networks, various types of paths and roads for laying pipes can be encountered, and it is not always a simple task to obtain the least costly layout or the one with the fewest issues during construction. In order to obtain objective results, different layout alternatives are evaluated using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Multicriteria Analysis Methodology and the Dijkstra algorithm to obtain optimal solutions. This is applied to twelve case studies where the types of available layout paths are identified as alternatives, and four criteria are established for their evaluation. Recognized experts in irrigation modernization conduct the evaluation to derive weighting coefficients for selecting the optimal layout. The coefficients or resistances obtained weigh the lengths of the pipes, allowing the selection of the most suitable alternative based on the defined criteria. The results are compared with a network designed by an expert using classical methodologies, revealing cost improvements in the design phase and a reduction in conflict points, thus leading to faster execution of the works.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Abadia Sanchez R., 2003, Doctoral Dissertation
[2]  
Abudu D., 2015, Advances in Computer Science: an International Journal, V44, P93
[3]   PROCEDURES FOR SYNTHESIZING RATIO JUDGEMENTS [J].
ACZEL, J ;
SAATY, TL .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 27 (01) :93-102
[4]  
Al-Subhi Al-Harbi K. M., 2001, International Journal of Project Management, V19, P19, DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00038-1
[5]   Productive efficiency and allocative efficiency: Why better water management may not solve the problem [J].
Allan, T .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 1999, 40 (01) :71-75
[6]   Evaluating the knowledge, relevance and experience of expert decision makers utilizing the Fuzzy-AHP [J].
Aly, S. ;
Vrana, I. .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA, 2008, 54 (11) :529-535
[7]  
Alzamora F.M., 2019, P 17 INT COMPUTING C
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Analisis de las Decisiones Multicriterio
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Agenda 2030 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. Una oportunidad para America Latina y el Caribe
[10]   MULTISTOP-BASED MEASUREMENTS OF ACCESSIBILITY IN A GIS ENVIRONMENT [J].
ARENTZE, TA ;
BORGERS, AWJ ;
TIMMERMANS, HJP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1994, 8 (04) :343-356