Effects of government subsidies on heavy-duty hydrogen fuel cell truck penetration: A scenario-based system dynamics model

被引:11
作者
Zhu, Min [1 ]
Dong, Peiwu [1 ]
Ju, Yanbing [1 ]
Li, Jiajun [2 ]
Ran, Lun [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
关键词
Heavy-duty hydrogen fuel cell truck; Single-stage subsidy; Two-stage subsidy; Subsidy efficiency; System dynamics model; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; INNOVATION DIFFUSION; POLICY INCENTIVES; ALTERNATIVE-FUEL; SUPPLY-SYSTEM; TECHNOLOGY; CHINA; OPTIMIZATION; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113809
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Enhancing energy security and cutting carbon emissions have rapidly boosted heavy-duty hydrogen fuel cell truck (HFCT) industry. Heavy-duty HFCT penetration involves four key players: consumers, refueling station operators, heavy-duty HFCT manufacturers, and hydrogen suppliers. Clear comprehension of government subsidy impacts on these agents can boost penetration. We used a system dynamics (SD) model to analyze single-stage and two-stage subsidy policies' impact on four agents, employing Shanghai, China as a case study. Results indicate that (1) Acquisition subsidies are most impactful, followed by refueling station construction subsidies, and R&D subsidies are least efficient, whether two-stage or single-stage. (2) For two-stage subsidies, higher and longer acquisition subsidies in the later stage are preferable, early stage benefits from higher, extended refueling station construction subsidies., the effect of the two-stage subsidy policy for heavy-duty HFCT R&D subsidies is not much different, and the hydrogen R&D subsidy should be lower and longer in the early stage. (3) Lower and longer subsidies for hydrogen R&D in the early stage will have the best subsidy effect. (4) The penetration reacts more to oil price shifts than operational cost changes. Finally, specific policy implications are offered to enhance heavy-duty HFCT adoption.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 98 条
[11]   Industrial hydrogen production technology and development status in China: a review [J].
Chai, Siqi ;
Zhang, Guojie ;
Li, Guoqiang ;
Zhang, Yongfa .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2021, 23 (07) :1931-1946
[12]   Model-based techno-economic evaluation of fuel cell vehicles considering technology uncertainties [J].
Chen, Yuche ;
Melaina, Marc .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 74 :234-244
[13]   Nash Equilibrium-Based Asymptotic Stability Analysis of Multi-Group Asymmetric Evolutionary Games in Typical Scenario of Electricity Market [J].
Cheng, Lefeng ;
Yu, Tao .
IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 :32064-32086
[14]  
China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, 2023, Sales of New Energy Vehicles in 2022
[15]   Cooperator-driven and defector-driven punishments: How do they influence cooperation? [J].
Cui, Pengbi ;
Wu, Zhi-Xi ;
Zhou, Tao ;
Chen, Xiaojie .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2019, 100 (05)
[16]   Effects of drivetrain hybridization on fuel economy, performance and costs of a fuel cell hybrid electric vehicle [J].
de Almeida, Silvio C. A. ;
Kruczan, Raphael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (79) :39404-39414
[17]   Exploring the value of electric vehicles to domestic end-users [J].
Ejeh, Jude O. ;
Roberts, Diarmid ;
Brown, Solomon F. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2023, 175
[18]   A dynamic model of electric vehicle adoption: The role of social commerce in new transportation [J].
Feng, Bo ;
Ye, Qiwen ;
Collins, Brian J. .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 56 (02) :196-212
[19]   Estimating the technical feasibility of fuel cell and battery electric vehicles for the medium and heavy duty sectors in California [J].
Forrest, Kate ;
Mac Kinnon, Michael ;
Tarroja, Brian ;
Samuelsen, Scott .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 276
[20]   Increasing electric vehicle policy efficiency and effectiveness by reducing mainstream market bias [J].
Green, Erin H. ;
Skerlos, Steven J. ;
Winebrake, James J. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 65 :562-566