Time to deterioration of patient-reported outcomes as a surrogate of overall survival: a meta-analysis

被引:4
作者
Shahnam, Adel [1 ,6 ]
Nindra, Udit [2 ]
Desai, Jayesh [1 ]
Hui, Rina [3 ]
Buyse, Marc [4 ]
Hopkins, Ashley M. [5 ]
Sorich, Michael J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Liverpool Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Ctr Canc Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Int Drug Dev Inst, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2023年 / 115卷 / 12期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL; LUNG-CANCER; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; CLINICAL-TRIALS; ONCOLOGY DRUGS; HEALTH; VALIDATION; SCORES; SCALE;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djad152
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Overall survival is the optimal marker of treatment efficacy in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) but can take considerable time to mature. Progression-free survival (PFS) has served as an early surrogate of overall survival but is imperfect. Time to deterioration in quality of life (QOL) measures could be a surrogate for overall survival.Methods Phase 3 RCTs in solid malignancies that reported overall survival, PFS, and time to deterioration in QOL or physical function published between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2022, were evaluated. Weighted regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between PFS, time to deterioration in QOL, and time to deterioration in physical function with overall survival. The coefficient of determination (R2) was used to quantify surrogacy.Results In total, 138 phase 3 RCTs were included. Of these, 47 trials evaluated immune checkpoint inhibitors and 91 investigated non-immune checkpoint inhibitor agents. Time to deterioration in QOL (137 RCTs) and time to deterioration in physical function (75 RCTs) performed similarly to PFS as surrogates for overall survival (R2 = 0.18 vs R2 = 0.19 and R2 = 0.10 vs R2 = 0.09, respectively). For immune checkpoint inhibitor studies, time to deterioration in physical function had a higher association with overall survival than with PFS (R2 = 0.38 vs R2 = 0.19), and PFS and time to deterioration in physical function did not correlate with each other (R2 = 0). When time to deterioration in physical function and PFS are used together, the coefficient of determination increased (R2 = 0.57).Conclusions Time to deterioration in physical function appears to be an overall survival surrogate measure of particular importance for immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment efficacy. The combination of time to deterioration in physical function with PFS may enable better prediction of overall survival treatment benefit in RCTs of immune checkpoint inhibitors than either PFS or time to deterioration in physical function alone.
引用
收藏
页码:1475 / 1482
页数:8
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]   Patient-reported outcomes from the phase III IMpassion130 trial of atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [J].
Adams, S. ;
Dieras, V. ;
Barrios, C. H. ;
Winer, E. P. ;
Schneeweiss, A. ;
Iwata, H. ;
Loi, S. ;
Patel, S. ;
Henschel, V. ;
Chui, S. Y. ;
Rugo, H. S. ;
Emens, L. A. ;
Schmid, P. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 (05) :582-589
[3]   The predictive utility of patient-reported outcomes and performance status for survival in metastatic lung cancer patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy [J].
Badaoui, Sarah ;
Shahnam, Adel ;
McKinnon, Ross A. ;
Abuhelwa, Ahmad Y. ;
Sorich, Michael J. ;
Hopkins, Ashley M. .
TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (03) :432-+
[4]   A 25-Year Experience of US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval of Malignant Hematology and Oncology Drugs and Biologics A Review [J].
Beaver, Julia A. ;
Howie, Lynn J. ;
Pelosof, Lorraine ;
Kim, Tamy ;
Liu, Jinzhong ;
Goldberg, Kirsten B. ;
Sridhara, Rajeshwari ;
Blumenthal, Gideon M. ;
Farrell, Ann T. ;
Keegan, Patricia ;
Pazdur, Richard ;
Kluetz, Paul G. .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (06) :849-856
[5]   Patient performance status and cancer immunotherapy efficacy: a meta-analysis [J].
Bersanelli, Melissa ;
Brighenti, Matteo ;
Buti, Sebastiano ;
Barni, Sandro ;
Petrelli, Fausto .
MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 35 (10)
[6]   Overall Response Rate, Progression-Free Survival, and Overall Survival With Targeted and Standard Therapies in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: US Food and Drug Administration Trial-Level and Patient-Level Analyses [J].
Blumenthal, Gideon M. ;
Karuri, Stella W. ;
Zhang, Hui ;
Zhang, Lijun ;
Khozin, Sean ;
Kazandjian, Dickran ;
Tang, Shenghui ;
Sridhara, Rajeshwari ;
Keegan, Patricia ;
Pazdur, Richard .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (09) :1008-+
[7]   Can changes in health related quality of life scores predict survival in stages III and IV colorectal cancer? [J].
Braun, Donald P. ;
Gupta, Digant ;
Grutsch, James F. ;
Staren, Edgar D. .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2011, 9
[8]   Surrogacy Beyond Prognosis: The Importance of "Trial-Level" Surrogacy [J].
Buyse, Marc ;
Saad, Everardo D. ;
Burzykowski, Tomasz ;
Regan, Meredith M. ;
Sweeney, Christopher S. .
ONCOLOGIST, 2022, 27 (04) :266-271
[9]   The prognostic effects of performance status and quality of life scores on progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer [J].
Carey, M. S. ;
Bacon, M. ;
Tu, D. ;
Butler, L. ;
Bezjak, A. ;
Stuart, G. C. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 108 (01) :100-105
[10]   THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CANCER-THERAPY SCALE - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE GENERAL MEASURE [J].
CELLA, DF ;
TULSKY, DS ;
GRAY, G ;
SARAFIAN, B ;
LINN, E ;
BONOMI, A ;
SILBERMAN, M ;
YELLEN, SB ;
WINICOUR, P ;
BRANNON, J ;
ECKBERG, K ;
LLOYD, S ;
PURL, S ;
BLENDOWSKI, C ;
GOODMAN, M ;
BARNICLE, M ;
STEWART, I ;
MCHALE, M ;
BONOMI, P ;
KAPLAN, E ;
TAYLOR, S ;
THOMAS, CR ;
HARRIS, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (03) :570-579