Current Role of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas: A 10-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparison with the Open Transcranial Approach

被引:7
作者
Figueredo, Luisa F. [1 ]
Martinez, Andrea L. [2 ]
Suarez-Meade, Paola [1 ]
Marenco-Hillembrand, Lina [1 ]
Salazar, Andres Felipe [2 ]
Pabon, Daniela [2 ]
Guzman, Juan [2 ]
Murguiondo-Perez, Renata [3 ]
Hallak, Hana [4 ]
Godo, Alex [5 ]
Sandoval-Garcia, Carolina [6 ]
Ordonez-Rubiano, Edgar G. [7 ]
Donaldson, Angela [8 ]
Chaichana, Kaisorn L. [1 ]
Peris-Celda, Maria [4 ]
Bendok, Bernard R. [9 ]
Samson, Susan L. [1 ,10 ]
Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo [1 ]
Almeida, Joao Paulo [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol Surg, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Univ Los Andes, Fac Med, Bogota 111711, Colombia
[3] Univ Anahuac Mexico Norte, Fac Med, Huixquilucan 52786, Mexico
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol Surg, Rochester, MN 55901 USA
[5] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Fac Med, Barcelona 08002, Spain
[6] Univ Minnesota Med Sch, Dept Neurosurg, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[7] Hosp San Jose, Fdn Univ Ciencias Salud, Soc Cirugia Bogota, Dept Neurol Surg, Bogota 111711, Colombia
[8] Mayo Clin, Dept Otolaryngol ENT Head & Neck Surg, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[9] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol Surg, Phoenix, AZ 85054 USA
[10] Mayo Clin, Dept Internal Med, Div Endocrinol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
craniopharyngioma; microscopic transsphenoidal; endoscopic endonasal; systematic review; meta-analysis; transcranial; TRANSSPHENOIDAL SURGERY; RESECTION; OUTCOMES; CLASSIFICATION; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/brainsci13060842
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In recent years, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for craniopharyngiomas has proven to be a safe option for extensive tumor resection, with minimal or no manipulation of the optic nerves and excellent visualization of the superior hypophyseal branches when compared to the Transcranial Approach (TCA). However, there is an ongoing debate regarding the criteria for selecting different approaches. To explore the current results of EEA and discuss its role in the management of craniopharyngiomas, we performed MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS searches from 2012 to 2022. Baseline characteristics, the extent of resection, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed through an X-2 and Fisher exact test, and a comparison between quantitative variables through a Kruskal-Wallis and verified with post hoc Bonferroni. The tumor volume was similar in both groups (EEA 11.92 cm(3), -TCA 13.23 cm(3)). The mean follow-up in months was 39.9 for EEA and 43.94 for TCA, p = 0.76). The EEA group presented a higher visual improvement rate (41.96% vs. 25% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 7.7). Permanent DI was less frequent with EEA (29.20% vs. 67.40% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 0.2). CSF Leaks occurred more frequently with EEA (9.94% vs. 0.70% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 15.8). Recurrence rates were lower in the EEA group (EEA 15.50% vs. for TCA 21.20%, p = 0.04, OR 0.7). Our results demonstrate that, in selected cases, EEA for resection of craniopharyngiomas is associated with better results regarding visual preservation and extent of tumor resection. Postoperative CSF leak rates associated with EEA have improved compared to the historical series. The decision-making process should consider each person's characteristics; however, it is noticeable that recent data regarding EEA justify its widespread application as a first-line approach in centers of excellence for skull base surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Endocrine and Visual Outcomes Following Gross Total Resection and Subtotal Resection of Adult Craniopharyngioma: Systematic Review end Meta-Analysis
    Akinduro, Oluwaseun O.
    Izzo, Alessandro
    Lu, Victor M.
    Ricciardi, Luca
    Trifiletti, Daniel
    Peterson, Jennifer L.
    Bernet, Victor
    Donaldson, Angela
    Eggenberger, Eric
    Olomu, Osarenoma
    Reimer, Ronald
    Wharen, Robert
    Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo
    Chaichana, Kaisorn L.
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 127 : E656 - E668
  • [2] The Medical Therapy of Craniopharyngiomas: The Way Ahead
    Alexandraki, Krystallenia, I
    Kaltsas, Gregory A.
    Karavitaki, Niki
    Grossman, Ashley B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2019, 104 (12) : 5751 - 5764
  • [3] Suprasellar pediatric craniopharyngioma resection via endonasal endoscopic approach
    Ali, Zarina S.
    Lang, Shih-Shan
    Kamat, Ameet R.
    Adappa, Nithin D.
    Palmer, James N.
    Storm, Phillip B.
    Lee, John Y. K.
    [J]. CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2013, 29 (11) : 2065 - 2070
  • [4] Current Results of Surgical Treatment of Craniopharyngiomas: The Impact of Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches
    Almeida, Joao Paulo
    Kalyvas, Aristotelis
    Mohan, Nilesh
    Oswari, Selfy
    Takami, Hirokazu
    Velasquez, Carlos
    Asha, Mohammed
    Zadeh, Gelareh
    Gentili, Fred
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 142 : 582 - 592
  • [5] Surgical Anatomy Applied to the Resection of Craniopharyngiomas: Anatomic Compartments and Surgical Classifications
    Almeida, Joao Paulo
    Workewych, Adriana
    Takami, Hirokazu
    Velasquez, Carlos
    Oswari, Selfy
    Asha, Mohammed
    Bernardo, Antonio
    Gentili, Fred
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 142 : 611 - 625
  • [6] Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery, A Reliable Method for Treating Primary and Recurrent/Residual Craniopharyngiomas: Nine Years of Experience
    Bal, Ercan
    Oge, Kamil
    Berker, Mustafa
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 94 : 375 - 385
  • [7] Alliance A071601: Phase II trial of BRAF/MEK inhibition in newly diagnosed papillary craniopharyngiomas.
    Brastianos, Priscilla Kaliopi
    Twohy, Erin
    Geyer, Susan Michelle
    Gerstner, Elizabeth Robins
    Kaufmann, Timothy J.
    Ruff, Michael
    Bota, Daniela Annenelie
    Reardon, David A.
    Cohen, Adam Louis
    De La Fuente, Macarena Ines
    Lesser, Glenn Jay
    Campian, Jian Li
    Agarwalla, Pankaj
    Kumthekar, Priya
    Cahill, Daniel P.
    Shih, Helen Alice
    Brown, Paul D.
    Santagata, Sandro
    Barker, Frederick G.
    Galanis, Evanthia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [8] Endoscopic and Microscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery of Craniopharyngiomas: A Systematic Review of Surgical Outcomes Over Two Decades
    Cagnazzo, Federico
    Zoli, Matteo
    Mazzatenta, Diego
    Van Gompel, Jamie J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 79 (03) : 247 - 256
  • [9] Approach selection and outcomes of craniopharyngioma resection: a single-institute study
    Cao Lei
    Li Chuzhong
    Liu Chunhui
    Zhao Peng
    Bai Jiwei
    Wang Xinsheng
    Zhang Yazhuo
    Gui Songbai
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2021, 44 (03) : 1737 - 1746
  • [10] Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery: History and Evolution
    Cavallo, Luigi M.
    Somma, Teresa
    Solari, Domenico
    Iannuzzo, Gianpiero
    Frio, Federico
    Baiano, Cinzia
    Cappabianca, Paolo
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 127 : 686 - 694