Leverage effect or crowding out effect? Evidence from low-carbon city pilot and energy technology innovation in China

被引:49
作者
Qu, Fang [1 ,3 ]
Xu, Lei [1 ,2 ]
He, Chunyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Xihua Univ, Sch Econ, Chengdu 610039, Peoples R China
[2] Xihua Univ, Sch Emergency Management, Chengdu 610039, Peoples R China
[3] 999 Jinzhou Rd,Jinniu Dist, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Energy technology innovation; Low-carbon city pilot; Environmental regulation; Renewable energy technology; Fossil energy technology; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2023.104423
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Energy technology composed of renewable and fossil energy is not entirely beneficial to the environment. Consequently, we believe that the direction of energy technology innovation should be clean to achieve sustainable development. This paper takes the low-carbon city pilot as a quasi-natural experiment, employs the difference-in-difference method and the energy technology patent data with A-share listed enterprises in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2007 to 2019 to explore the incentive effect, mechanism, and heterogeneity of lowcarbon city pilot on the direction of energy technology innovation. We found that (1) the low-carbon city pilot has an incentive effect on the direction of energy technology innovation by promoting renewable energy technology, which indicates that the clean direction of energy technology innovation is taking shape. (2) The incentive effect of low-carbon city pilot on energy technology innovation is not the leverage effect superimposed on the established innovation activities of enterprises, but the crowding out effect on other technological innovation. This means that the pilot policy is suspected of negatively the productivity of enterprises. (3) The quality of energy technology innovation has not been stimulated, renewable energy technologies that are easy to generate high economic benefits are favored by enterprises, and environmental information disclosure profits to improve the policy effect of low-carbon city pilot. This study provides implications for the effective implementation of environmental policy and the synergistic of renewable and fossil energy technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] The Environment and Directed Technical Change
    Acemoglu, Daron
    Aghion, Philippe
    Bursztyn, Leonardo
    Hemous, David
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) : 131 - 166
  • [2] Aghion P, 2016, J POLIT ECON, V124, P1
  • [3] Total solar irradiance's effect on the performance of empirical models for estimating global solar radiation: An empirical-based review
    Almorox, Javier
    Voyant, Cyril
    Bailek, Nadjem
    Kuriqi, Alban
    Arnaldo, J. A.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2021, 236
  • [4] The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?
    Ambec, Stefan
    Cohen, Mark A.
    Elgie, Stewart
    Lanoie, Paul
    [J]. REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) : 2 - 22
  • [5] Corporate governance and green innovation
    Amore, Mario Daniele
    Bennedsen, Morten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 75 : 54 - 72
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, SSRN ELECT J, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2736357
  • [7] How does hedge fund activism reshape corporate innovation?
    Brav, Alon
    Jiang, Wei
    Ma, Song
    Tian, Xuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 130 (02) : 237 - 264
  • [8] Voluntary environmental regulation and firm innovation in China
    Bu, Maoliang
    Qiao, Zhenzi
    Liu, Beibei
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 89 : 10 - 18
  • [9] Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Cai, Xiqian
    Lu, Yi
    Wu, Mingqin
    Yu, Linhui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2016, 123 : 73 - 85
  • [10] Carnahan S., 2010, BUSINESS, V1154, P1, DOI DOI 10.1002/SMJ