Bias reported by family caregivers in support received when assisting patients with cancer-related decision-making

被引:4
|
作者
Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ornstein, Katherine A. [4 ]
Azuero, Andres [1 ]
Harrell, Erin R. [5 ]
Gazaway, Shena [1 ,3 ]
Watts, Kristen Allen [6 ]
Ejem, Deborah [1 ]
Bechthold, Avery C. [1 ]
Lee, Kyungmi [1 ]
Puga, Frank [1 ]
Miller-Sonet, Ellen [7 ]
Williams, Grant R. [8 ]
Kent, Erin E. [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Nursing, 1720 2nd Ave South,NB 485J, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Div Gerontol Geriatr & Palliat Care, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Ctr Palliat & Support Care, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[4] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Geriatr & Palliat Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] Univ Alabama, Dept Psychol, Box 870348, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[6] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Div Prevent Med, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[7] CancerCare, New York, NY USA
[8] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[9] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2023年 / 12卷 / 03期
关键词
bias; cancer; decision-making; discrimination; family caregiver; ANXIETY DISORDERS; HEALTH-CARE; DISCRIMINATION; CONSEQUENCES; ASSOCIATION; ACCESS; AGE;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.5182
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Family caregivers play are playing an increasing role in cancer treatment decision-making. We examined bias reported by family caregivers in the support they and their patient received from their healthcare team when making these decisions, including associations with distress. Methods Analysis of 2021 national survey data of family caregivers of patients with cancer (N = 2703). Bias experienced in decision support was assessed with the item: "Have you felt that the support you and the person with cancer have received for making cancer-related decisions by your doctor or healthcare team has been negatively affected by any of the following?" Check-all-that-apply response options included: age, race, language, education, political affiliation, body weight, insurance type or lack of insurance, income, religion, sexual orientation, and gender/sex. Chi-square and regression analyses assessed associations between bias and caregiver distress (GAD-2, PHQ-2). Results Of 2703 caregiver respondents, 47.4% (n = 1281) reported experiencing >= 1 bias(es) when receiving decision support for making cancer-related decisions. Bias was more prevalent among younger caregivers, males, transwomen/men or gender non-conforming caregivers, racial/ethnic minorities, and those providing care over a longer time period. The odds of having high anxiety (GAD-2 scores >= 3) were 2.1 times higher for caregivers experiencing one type of bias (adjusted OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.6-2.8) and 4.2 times higher for caregivers experiencing >= 2 biases (adjusted OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 3.4-5.3) compared to none. Similar results were found for high depression scores (PHQ-2 scores >= 3). Conclusions Nearly half of caregivers involved in their care recipients' cancer-related decisions report bias in decision support received from the healthcare team. Experiencing bias was strongly associated with high psychological distress.
引用
收藏
页码:3567 / 3576
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] Values and options in cancer care (VOICE): study design and rationale for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for physicians, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers
    Hoerger, Michael
    Epstein, Ronald M.
    Winters, Paul C.
    Fiscella, Kevin
    Duberstein, Paul R.
    Gramling, Robert
    Butow, Phyllis N.
    Mohile, Supriya G.
    Kaesberg, Paul R.
    Tang, Wan
    Plumb, Sandy
    Walczak, Adam
    Back, Anthony L.
    Tancredi, Daniel
    Venuti, Alison
    Cipri, Camille
    Escalera, Gisela
    Ferro, Carol
    Gaudion, Don
    Hoh, Beth
    Leatherwood, Blair
    Lewis, Linda
    Robinson, Mark
    Sullivan, Peter
    Kravitz, Richard L.
    BMC CANCER, 2013, 13
  • [22] Patient reported factors influencing the decision-making process of men with localised prostate cancer when considering Active Surveillance-A systematic review and thematic synthesis
    Cunningham, Maggie
    Murphy, Mike
    Sweeney, Paul
    Richards, Helen L.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2022, 31 (03) : 388 - 404
  • [23] Factors Impacting on Patient-Centered Communication Skills and Their Opportunities to Be Involved in Decision-making From the Perspective of Patients With Cancer, Informal Caregivers, and/or Healthcare Professionals
    Abu-Odah, Hammoda
    Chan, Engle Angela
    Molassiotis, Alex
    CANCER NURSING, 2024,
  • [24] Factors associated with family decision-making self-efficacy among family members of patients with advanced cancer in mainland China
    Hu, Yangfan
    Wang, Wenxia
    Jiang, Yali
    Wang, Xixi
    Peng, Xuelan
    Xin, Mingzhu
    Zhao, Juanjuan
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2024, 22 (05) : 1317 - 1323
  • [25] Decision-making trade-offs: A classic grounded theory study of Chinese acute leukaemia patients and their family caregivers across the trajectory of illness
    Wang, Ying
    Wu, Yong
    Hu, Rong
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (21-22) : 7834 - 7845
  • [26] Patients' and Providers' Needs and Preferences When Considering Fertility Preservation Before Cancer Treatment: Decision-Making Needs Assessment
    Hoffman, Aubri
    Crocker, Laura
    Mathur, Aakrati
    Holman, Deborah
    Weston, June
    Campbell, Sukhkamal
    Housten, Ashley
    Bradford, Andrea
    Agrawala, Shilpi
    Woodard, Terri L.
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2021, 5 (06)
  • [27] Healthcare Professionals' Perspective on Supporting Patients and Family Caregivers in End-Of-Life Care Decision-Making: A Qualitative Study in Specialist Palliative Care
    Featherstone, Hannah J.
    McQuillan, Regina
    Foley, Geraldine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [28] Variation in Patient-Reported Decision-Making Roles in the Last Year of Life among Patients with Metastatic Cancer: A Longitudinal Study
    Ozdemir, Semra
    Chaudhry, Isha
    Tan, Si Ning Germaine
    Teo, Irene
    Malhotra, Chetna
    Malhotra, Rahul
    Finkelstein, Eric Andrew
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2023, 43 (02) : 203 - 213
  • [29] Men's and Women's Approaches to Disclosure About BRCA-Related Cancer Risks and Family Planning Decision-Making
    Dean, Marleah
    Rauscher, Emily A.
    QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2018, 28 (14) : 2155 - 2168
  • [30] Clinicians' concerns about decision support interventions for patients facing breast cancer surgery options: understanding the challenge of implementing shared decision-making
    Caldon, Lisa J. M.
    Collins, Karen A.
    Reed, Malcolm W.
    Sivell, Stephanie
    Austoker, Joan
    Clements, Alison M.
    Patnick, Julietta
    Elwyn, Glyn
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2011, 14 (02) : 133 - 146