Measuring fundamental care using complexity science: A descriptive case study of a methodological innovation

被引:21
作者
Conroy, Tiffany [1 ,2 ]
Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra [1 ]
Mudd, Alexandra [1 ]
Mitchell, Merle [3 ]
Kitson, Alison [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Caring Futures Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Aged Care Consumer Advocate & Community Activist, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
complex adaptive systems; complexity science; fundamentals of care; network analysis; nursing;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.15905
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and objectives This paper presents an exploratory account of an innovative methodology to record and evaluate fundamental care. Fundamental care is defined as the care required by everyone for survival, health and welfare. Background Fundamental care has been informed by the development and testing of the Fundamentals of Care Framework, which describes how fundamental care is complex and multidimensional, and consists of three interrelated dimensions and 38 elements. This accords with a broader re-examination of care provision as part of a complex adaptive system in which existing linear models of cause and effect are inadequate to describe the totality of activity. Design Informed by graph theory and complexity science, this paper presents a novel methodological innovation. It uses the Fundamentals of Care Framework to create a Matrix to quantify the relationships between different elements within the Framework. Methods We use a Matrix methodology to process care recipient narratives to generate three outputs: a heat map, a summary table and a network analysis. Conclusions The three outputs serve to quantify and evaluate fundamental care in a multidimensional manner. They capture different perspectives (care recipients and their families, direct care providers and care managers) to improve care outcomes. The future aim is to advance this exploration into digitalising and operationalising the Matrix in a user-friendly manner for it to become a real-time mechanism to evaluate and potentially predict patterns of fundamental care.
引用
收藏
页码:2903 / 2912
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Observational research on fundamental nursing care: Enough already!
    Richards, David A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2020, 29 (11-12) : 1765 - 1767
  • [22] Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety, 2019, INT REP NEGL
  • [23] Scoping review of complexity theory in health services research
    Thompson, David S.
    Fazio, Xavier
    Kustra, Erika
    Patrick, Linda
    Stanley, Darren
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2016, 16
  • [24] von Hayek, 1974, FA VONHAYEK PRIZE LE
  • [25] Waters D., 2016, POTTER PERRYS FUNDAM, P15