Measuring fundamental care using complexity science: A descriptive case study of a methodological innovation

被引:21
作者
Conroy, Tiffany [1 ,2 ]
Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra [1 ]
Mudd, Alexandra [1 ]
Mitchell, Merle [3 ]
Kitson, Alison [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Caring Futures Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Aged Care Consumer Advocate & Community Activist, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
complex adaptive systems; complexity science; fundamentals of care; network analysis; nursing;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.15905
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and objectives This paper presents an exploratory account of an innovative methodology to record and evaluate fundamental care. Fundamental care is defined as the care required by everyone for survival, health and welfare. Background Fundamental care has been informed by the development and testing of the Fundamentals of Care Framework, which describes how fundamental care is complex and multidimensional, and consists of three interrelated dimensions and 38 elements. This accords with a broader re-examination of care provision as part of a complex adaptive system in which existing linear models of cause and effect are inadequate to describe the totality of activity. Design Informed by graph theory and complexity science, this paper presents a novel methodological innovation. It uses the Fundamentals of Care Framework to create a Matrix to quantify the relationships between different elements within the Framework. Methods We use a Matrix methodology to process care recipient narratives to generate three outputs: a heat map, a summary table and a network analysis. Conclusions The three outputs serve to quantify and evaluate fundamental care in a multidimensional manner. They capture different perspectives (care recipients and their families, direct care providers and care managers) to improve care outcomes. The future aim is to advance this exploration into digitalising and operationalising the Matrix in a user-friendly manner for it to become a real-time mechanism to evaluate and potentially predict patterns of fundamental care.
引用
收藏
页码:2903 / 2912
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Prioritizing the Fundamentals of Care Within the Prelicensure Nursing Curriculum
    Alderman, Jan
    Kastelein, Christopher
    Feo, Rebecca
    Frensham, Lauren
    Salamon, Yvette
    Kitson, Alison
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2018, 57 (08) : 498 - 501
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, EV SCAN COMPL AD SYS
  • [3] Methods, metrics and research gaps around minimum data sets for nursing practice and fundamental care: A scoping literature review
    Athlin, Asa Muntlin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2018, 27 (11-12) : 2230 - 2247
  • [4] Descriptions of fundamental care needs in cancer careAn exploratory study
    Athlin, Asa Muntlin
    Brovall, Maria
    Wengstrom, Yvonne
    Conroy, Tiffany
    Kitson, Alison L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2018, 27 (11-12) : 2322 - 2332
  • [5] Do complexity-informed health interventions work? A scoping review
    Brainard, Julii
    Hunter, Paul R.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2016, 11
  • [6] The time has come: Embedded implementation research for health care improvement
    Churruca, Kate
    Ludlow, Kristiana
    Taylor, Natalie
    Long, Janet C.
    Best, Stephanie
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (03) : 373 - 380
  • [7] Dodder Rebecca., 2000, Complex Adaptive Systems and Complexity Theory: Inter-related Knowledge Domains
  • [8] Feo R., 2016, POTTER PERRYS FUNDAM, V5th, P30
  • [9] How fundamental aspects of nursing care are defined in the literature: A scoping review
    Feo, Rebecca
    Kitson, Alison
    Conroy, Tiffany
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2018, 27 (11-12) : 2189 - 2229
  • [10] Francis R., 2013, REP MIDST NHS FDN TR