Seismic response and performance prediction of steel buckling-restrained braced frames using machine-learning methods

被引:66
作者
Asgarkhani, N. [1 ]
Kazemi, F. [1 ,2 ]
Jakubczyk-Galczynska, A. [1 ]
Mohebi, B. [3 ]
Jankowski, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gdansk Univ Technol, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, Ul Narutowicza 11-12, PL-80233 Gdansk, Poland
[2] UCL, Dept Civil Environm & Geomat Engn, London, England
[3] Imam Khomeini Int Univ, Fac Engn & Technol, Qazvin, Iran
关键词
Buckling-restrained braced frame; Machine-learning algorithm; Residual interstory drift; Seismic retrofit; Seismic performance curve; Seismic failure probability; RESIDUAL DRIFT; DUAL SYSTEMS; DEMANDS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107388
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Nowadays, Buckling-Restrained Brace Frames (BRBFs) have been used as lateral force-resisting systems for low-, to mid-rise buildings. Residual Interstory Drift (RID) of BRBFs plays a key role in deciding to retrofit buildings after seismic excitation; however, existing formulas have limitations and cannot effectively help civil engineers, e.g., FEMA P-58, which is a conservative estimation method. Therefore, there is a need to provide a comprehensive tool for estimating seismic responses of Interstory Drift (ID) and RID with novel approaches to fulfill the shortcomings of existing formulas. The Machine Learning (ML) method is an interdisciplinary approach that makes it possible to solve these types of engineering problems. Therefore, the current study proposes ML algorithms to provide a prediction model for determining the seismic response, seismic performance curve, and seismic failure probability curve of BRBFs. To train ML-based prediction models, Nonlinear Time-History Analysis (NTHA) and Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) were performed on the 2-, to 12-Story BRBFs subjected to 78 far-field ground motions, and 606944 data points were prepared for different prediction purposes. The results indicate that the considered approaches are justified. For instance, the proposed ML methods have the ability to predict the maximum ID, maximum RID and maximum roof ID with the accuracy of even 98.7%, 95.2%, and 93.8%, respectively, for the 4-Story BRBF. Moreover, a general preliminary estimation tool is introduced to provide predictions based on the input parameters considered in the study.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, P58 FEMA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, AISC 360 16
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, GCR 10-917-8
[5]  
ASCE, 2016, ASCE/SEI 7-16
[6]   Machine learning-based prediction of residual drift and seismic risk assessment of steel moment-resisting frames considering soil-structure interaction [J].
Asgarkhani, N. ;
Kazemi, F. ;
Jankowski, R. .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2023, 289
[7]   Evaluation of approximate methods for estimating residual drift demands in BRBFs [J].
Asgarkhani, Neda ;
Yakhchalian, Mansoor ;
Mohebi, Benyamin .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 224
[8]   Dual seismic-resistant steel frame with high post-yield stiffness energy-dissipative braces for residual drift reduction [J].
Baiguera, Marco ;
Vasdravellis, George ;
Karavasilis, Theodore L. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2016, 122 :198-212
[9]   Achieving a more effective concentric braced frame by the double-stage yield BRB [J].
Barbagallo, F. ;
Bosco, M. ;
Marino, E. M. ;
Rossi, P. P. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 186 :484-497
[10]   Building pounding damage observed in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake [J].
Cole, Gregory L. ;
Dhakal, Rajesh P. ;
Turner, Fred M. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2012, 41 (05) :893-913