Multistep estimators of the between-study covariance matrix under the multivariate random-effects model for meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Jackson, Dan [1 ]
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang [2 ]
van Aert, Robbie C. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] AstraZeneca, Stat Innovat, Cambridge, England
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Psychiat & Neuropsychol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Tilburg Univ, Dept Methodol & Stat, POB 90153, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
heterogeneity; iterative methods; meta-regression; method of moments; multivariate statistical models; CLINICAL-TRIALS; VARIANCE; MOMENTS;
D O I
10.1002/sim.9985
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A wide variety of methods are available to estimate the between-study variance under the univariate random-effects model for meta-analysis. Some, but not all, of these estimators have been extended so that they can be used in the multivariate setting. We begin by extending the univariate generalised method of moments, which immediately provides a wider class of multivariate methods than was previously available. However, our main proposal is to use this new type of estimator to derive multivariate multistep estimators of the between-study covariance matrix. We then use the connection between the univariate multistep and Paule-Mandel estimators to motivate taking the limit, where the number of steps tends toward infinity. We illustrate our methodology using two contrasting examples and investigate its properties in a simulation study. We conclude that the proposed methodology is a fully viable alternative to existing estimation methods, is well suited to sensitivity analyses that explore the use of alternative estimators, and should be used instead of the existing DerSimonian and Laird-type moments based estimator in application areas where data are expected to be heterogeneous. However, multistep estimators do not seem to outperform the existing estimators when the data are more homogeneous. Advantages of the new multivariate multistep estimator include its semi-parametric nature and that it is computationally feasible in high dimensions. Our proposed estimation methods are also applicable for multivariate random-effects meta-regression, where study-level covariates are included in the model.
引用
收藏
页码:756 / 773
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Inference using an exact distribution of test statistic for random-effects meta-analysis
    Hanada, Keisuke
    Sugimoto, Tomoyuki
    ANNALS OF THE INSTITUTE OF STATISTICAL MATHEMATICS, 2023, 75 (02) : 281 - 302
  • [42] Random-Effects Model Aimed at Discovering Associations in Meta-Analysis of Genome-wide Association Studies
    Han, Buhm
    Eskin, Eleazar
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2011, 88 (05) : 586 - 598
  • [43] Gibbs sampler approach for objective Bayesian inference in elliptical multivariate meta-analysis random effects model
    Bodnar, Olha
    Bodnar, Taras
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2024, 197
  • [44] Comparison of random-effects meta-analysis models for the relative risk in the case of rare events: A simulation study
    Beisemann, Marie
    Doebler, Philipp
    Holling, Heinz
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 62 (07) : 1597 - 1630
  • [45] The Hartung-Knapp modification for random-effects meta-analysis: A useful refinement but are there any residual concerns?
    Jackson, Dan
    Law, Martin
    Ruecker, Gerta
    Schwarzer, Guido
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (25) : 3923 - 3934
  • [46] Inferences about the between-study variance in meta-analysis with normally distributed outcomes
    Tian, Lili
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 50 (02) : 248 - 256
  • [47] Sensitivity of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: proposed metrics and empirical evaluation
    Patsopoulos, Nikolaos A.
    Evangelou, Evangelos
    Ioannidis, John P.A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 37 (05) : 1148 - 1157
  • [48] A likelihood ratio test for the homogeneity of between-study variance in network meta-analysis
    Dapeng Hu
    Chong Wang
    Annette M. O’Connor
    Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [49] On weakly informative prior distributions for the heterogeneity parameter in Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis
    Roever, Christian
    Bender, Ralf
    Dias, Sofia
    Schmid, Christopher H.
    Schmidli, Heinz
    Sturtz, Sibylle
    Weber, Sebastian
    Friede, Tim
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2021, 12 (04) : 448 - 474
  • [50] A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods in random-effects network meta-analysis of binary data
    Seide, Svenja E.
    Jensen, Katrin
    Kieser, Meinhard
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2020, 11 (03) : 363 - 378