Multistep estimators of the between-study covariance matrix under the multivariate random-effects model for meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Jackson, Dan [1 ]
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang [2 ]
van Aert, Robbie C. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] AstraZeneca, Stat Innovat, Cambridge, England
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Psychiat & Neuropsychol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Tilburg Univ, Dept Methodol & Stat, POB 90153, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
heterogeneity; iterative methods; meta-regression; method of moments; multivariate statistical models; CLINICAL-TRIALS; VARIANCE; MOMENTS;
D O I
10.1002/sim.9985
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A wide variety of methods are available to estimate the between-study variance under the univariate random-effects model for meta-analysis. Some, but not all, of these estimators have been extended so that they can be used in the multivariate setting. We begin by extending the univariate generalised method of moments, which immediately provides a wider class of multivariate methods than was previously available. However, our main proposal is to use this new type of estimator to derive multivariate multistep estimators of the between-study covariance matrix. We then use the connection between the univariate multistep and Paule-Mandel estimators to motivate taking the limit, where the number of steps tends toward infinity. We illustrate our methodology using two contrasting examples and investigate its properties in a simulation study. We conclude that the proposed methodology is a fully viable alternative to existing estimation methods, is well suited to sensitivity analyses that explore the use of alternative estimators, and should be used instead of the existing DerSimonian and Laird-type moments based estimator in application areas where data are expected to be heterogeneous. However, multistep estimators do not seem to outperform the existing estimators when the data are more homogeneous. Advantages of the new multivariate multistep estimator include its semi-parametric nature and that it is computationally feasible in high dimensions. Our proposed estimation methods are also applicable for multivariate random-effects meta-regression, where study-level covariates are included in the model.
引用
收藏
页码:756 / 773
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Summarizing empirical information on between-study heterogeneity for Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis
    Roever, Christian
    Sturtz, Sibylle
    Lilienthal, Jona
    Bender, Ralf
    Friede, Tim
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (14) : 2439 - 2454
  • [2] Avoiding zero between-study variance estimates in random-effects meta-analysis
    Chung, Yeojin
    Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia
    Choi, In-Hee
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (23) : 4071 - 4089
  • [3] Approximate confidence intervals for moment-based estimators of the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis
    Jackson, Dan
    Bowden, Jack
    Baker, Rose
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2015, 6 (04) : 372 - 382
  • [4] Heterogeneity and study size in random-effects meta-analysis
    Bowater, Russell J.
    Escarela, Gabriel
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2013, 40 (01) : 2 - 16
  • [5] Random-Effects Meta-analysis of Inconsistent Effects: A Time for Change
    Cornell, John E.
    Mulrow, Cynthia D.
    Localio, Russell
    Stack, Catharine B.
    Meibohm, Anne R.
    Guallar, Eliseo
    Goodman, Steven N.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 160 (04) : 267 - 270
  • [6] On random-effects meta-analysis
    Zeng, D.
    Lin, D. Y.
    BIOMETRIKA, 2015, 102 (02) : 281 - 294
  • [7] Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update
    DerSimonian, Rebecca
    Kacker, Raghu
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 28 (02) : 105 - 114
  • [8] Power analysis for random-effects meta-analysis
    Jackson, Dan
    Turner, Rebecca
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2017, 8 (03) : 290 - 302
  • [9] A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Thompson, Simon G.
    Spiegelhalter, David J.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2009, 172 : 137 - 159
  • [10] Random-effects meta-analysis: the number of studies matters
    Guolo, Annamaria
    Varin, Cristiano
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (03) : 1500 - 1518