Fate of target visceral vessels in fenestrated and branched complex endovascular aortic repair

被引:3
|
作者
Fargion, Aaron Thomas [1 ]
Esposito, Davide [1 ]
Speziali, Sara [1 ]
Pulli, Raffaele [1 ]
Gallitto, Enrico [2 ,3 ]
Faggioli, Gianluca [2 ,3 ]
Gargiulo, Mauro [2 ,3 ]
Bertoglio, Luca [4 ]
Melissano, Germano [4 ]
Chiesa, Roberto [4 ]
Simonte, Gioele [5 ]
Isernia, Giacomo [5 ]
Lenti, Massimo [5 ]
Pratesi, C.
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Careggi Univ Teaching Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac & Vasc Surg, Vasc Surg, Florence, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, St Orsola Malpighi Hosp, Dept Expt Diagnost & Specialty Med, Vasc Surg, Bologna, Italy
[3] Univ Hosp St Orsola, IRCCS, Vasc Surg Unit, Bologna, Italy
[4] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, IRCCS San Raffaele Sci Inst, Div Vasc Surg, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Perugia, S Maria Misericordia Hosp, Vasc & Endovasc Surg Unit, Perugia, Italy
关键词
Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm; Target visceral vessels; Patency; Endoleaks; Endovascular procedures; REPORTING STANDARDS; ANEURYSM REPAIR; RENAL BRANCHES; OUTCOMES; INSTABILITY; DURABILITY; GUIDELINES; ENDOGRAFTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To assess branch vessel outcomes after endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms analyzing possible factors influencing early and long-term results. Methods: The Italian Multicentre Fenestrated and Branched registry enrolled 596 consecutive patients treated with fenestrated and branched endografts for complex aortic disease from January 2008 to December 2019 by four Italian academic centers. The primary end points of the study were technical success (defined as target visceral vessel [TVV] patency and absence of bridging device-related endoleak at final intraoperative control), and freedom from TVV instability (defined as the combined results of type IC/IIIC endoleaks and patency loss) during follow-up. Secondary end points were overall survival and TVV-related reinterventions. Results: We excluded 591 patients (3 patients with a surgical debranching and 2 patients who died before completion from the study cohort) were treated for a total of 1991 visceral vessels targeted by either a directional branch or a fenestration. The overall technical success rate was 98.4%. Failure was related to the use of an off-the-shelf (OTS) device (custom-made device vs OTS, HR, 0.220; P = .007) and a preoperative TVV stenosis of >50% (HR, 12.460; P < .001). The mean follow-up time was 25.1 months (interquartile range, 3-39 months). The overall estimated survival rates were 87%, 77.4%, and 67.8% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively (standard error [SE], 0.015, 0.022, and 0.032). During follow-up, TVV branch instability was observed in 91 vessels (5%): 48 type IC/IIIC endoleaks (2.6%) and 43 stenoses-thromboses (2.4%). The extent of aneurysm disease (thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm [TAAA] types I-III vs TAAA type IV/juxtarenal aortic aneurysm/pararenal aortic aneurysm) was the only independent predictor for developing a TVV-related type IC/IIIC endoleak (HR, 3.899; 95% confidence interval [CI]:, 1.924-7.900; P < .001). Risk of patency loss was independently associated with branch configuration (HR, 8.883; P < .001; 95% CI, 3.750-21.043) and renal arteries (HR, 2.848; P = .030; 95% CI, 1.108-7.319). Estimated rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of freedom from TVV instability and freedom from TVV-related reinter-vention were 96.6%, 93.8%, and 90% (SE, 0.005, 0.007, and 0.014) and 97.4%, 95.0%, and 91.6% (SE, 0.004, 0.007, and 0.013), respectively. Conclusions: Intraoperative failure to bridge a TVV was associated with a preoperative TVV stenosis of >50% and the use of OTS devices. Midterm outcomes were satisfying, with an estimated 5-year freedom from TVV instability and reintervention of 90.0% and 91.6%, respectively. During follow-up, the larger extent of aneurysm disease was associated with an increased risk of TVV-related endoleaks, whereas a branch configuration and renal arteries were more prone to patency loss.
引用
收藏
页码:584 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes of target vessel endoleaks after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair
    Kaerkkaeinen, Jussi M.
    Tenorio, Emanuel R.
    Jain, Akhilesh
    Mendes, Bernardo C.
    Macedo, Thanila A.
    Pather, Keouna
    Gloviczki, Peter
    Oderich, Gustavo S.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 72 (02) : 445 - 455
  • [2] Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm With More Than 4 Target Visceral Vessels due to Renovisceral Arterial Anatomical Variations: Feasibility and Early Results
    Eleshra, Ahmed
    Panuccio, Giuseppe
    Spanos, Konstantinos
    Rohlffs, Fiona
    Tsilimparis, Nikolaos
    Koelbel, Tilo
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2021, 28 (05) : 692 - 699
  • [3] Management of failed endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with explantation or fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Dias, Agenor P.
    Farivar, Behzad S.
    Steenberge, Sean P.
    Brier, Corey
    Kuramochi, Yuki
    Lyden, Sean P.
    Eagleton, Matthew J.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 68 (06) : 1676 - +
  • [4] Practice patterns of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy after fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair
    Fan, Emily Y.
    Schanzer, Andres
    Beck, Adam W.
    Eagleton, Matthew J.
    Farber, Mark A.
    Gasper, Warren J.
    Lee, W. Anthony
    Oderich, Gustavo S.
    Parodi, F. Ezequiel
    Schneider, Darren B.
    Sweet, Matthew P.
    Timaran, Carlos H.
    Simons, Jessica P.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 80 (04)
  • [5] Fate of primary determinate and indeterminate target vessel endoleaks after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair
    Squizzato, Francesco
    Antonello, Michele
    Modena, Matteo
    Forcella, Edoardo
    Colacchio, Elda Chiara
    Grego, Franco
    Piazza, Michele
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 79 (02)
  • [6] Bridging stent grafts in fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair: current practice and possible complications
    Lindstrom, David
    Mani, Kevin
    Lundberg, Goran
    Wanhainen, Anders
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 60 (04) : 476 - 484
  • [7] Gender disparities in fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair
    Riess, Henrik Christian
    Debus, Eike Sebastian
    Schwaneberg, Thea
    Sedrakyan, Art
    Koelbel, Tilo
    Tsilimparis, Nikolaos
    Larena-Avellaneda, Axel
    Behrendt, Christian-Alexander
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2019, 55 (02) : 338 - 344
  • [8] Outcomes and complications after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair
    Motta, Fernando
    Crowner, Jason R.
    Kalbaugh, Corey A.
    Marston, William A.
    Pascarella, Luigi
    McGinigle, Katharine L.
    Kibbe, Melina R.
    Farber, Mark A.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 70 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [9] Does surgical companionship modify the learning curve for fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair?
    Mesnard, Thomas
    Jeanneau, Clement
    Patterson, Benjamin O.
    Dubosq, Maxime
    Vidal-Diez, Alberto
    Haulon, Stephan
    Sobocinski, Jonathan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 63 (06)
  • [10] Impact of secondary interventions on mortality after fenestrated branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Giles, Kristina A.
    Scali, Salvatore T.
    Pearce, Benjamin J.
    Huber, Thomas S.
    Berceli, Scott A.
    Arnaoutakis, Dean J.
    Back, Martin R.
    Fatima, Javairiah
    Upchurch, Gilbert R., Jr.
    Beck, Adam W.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 70 (06) : 1737 - +