Internal mammary perforator vessels as recipient for microvascular breast reconstruction: Technique and outcomes in 161 flaps

被引:0
|
作者
Friebel, Thessa R. [1 ,2 ]
Shanmugakrishnan, R. Raja [1 ]
Zberea, Diana [1 ]
Morgan, Mary [1 ]
Hussain, Amer [1 ]
Ramakrishnan, Venkat [1 ]
机构
[1] St Andrews Ctr Plast & Burns, Court Rd, Chelmsford CM17ET, England
[2] St Andrews Ctr Plast & Burns, Court Rd, Broomfield CM17ET, England
关键词
Breast reconstruction; Free flap; Internal mammary perforator vessels; Microsurgery; RIB-PRESERVATION TECHNIQUE; FREE TRAM; ABDOMINAL FLAP; DIEP; SITE;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2023.07.034
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The use of internal mammary perforator (IMP) vessels as recipients for free flap breast reconstruction was first described in 1999. Despite numerous advantages over the internal mammary (IM) and thoracodorsal recipient vessels, their widespread use remains mired in concern. This paper describes our method of IMP vessel preparation and outcomes with regard to safety and reliability. Methods: To support the reliability of the IMP vessel preparation, a retrospective study on prospectively collected data of all free flap breast reconstruction patients between 1 July 2016 and 31 July 2019 was performed. Data were collected on patient demographics, type of reconstruction operative details and complications.Results: Out of the 450 flaps performed, the IMP vessels were used in 36% of the cases. Of these cases, 18% had received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and 15% had a history of radiotherapy to the chest wall. In total, 161 flaps were performed to reconstruct 138 breasts (115 single and 23 stacked flaps). Three patients required a return to theatre, with one needing recipient vessel revision from the IMP to the IM vessels due to calibre mismatch. No mastectomy skin flap necrosis, free flap loss or significant fat necrosis were encountered. Conclusion: This article describes an IM vessel preparation method that results in predictable outcomes in both single and stacked flap reconstructions with a low complication rate. Due to their reliability and versatility, we consider the IMP vessels a valuable attribute to the recipient vessel arsenal of any breast reconstruction microsurgeon.& COPY; 2023 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 462
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Congenital breast deformity reconstruction using perforator flaps
    Gautam, Abhinav K.
    Allen, Robert J., Jr.
    LoTempio, Maria M.
    Mountcastle, Timothy S.
    Levine, Joshua L.
    Allen, Robert J.
    Chiu, Ernest S.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2007, 58 (04) : 353 - 358
  • [42] Outcomes of internal mammary artery perforator flap in head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review
    Vasudevan, Srivatsa Surya
    Rogers, Brianna
    Adilbay, Dauren
    Olinde, Lindsay
    Pang, John
    Nathan, Cherie-Ann O.
    Asarkar, Ameya A.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2024, 46 (08): : 2076 - 2085
  • [43] Comparison of the second and third intercostal spaces regarding the use of internal mammary vessels as recipient vessels in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: An anatomical and clinical study
    Seong, Ik Hyun
    Woo, Kyong-Je
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2020, 47 (04): : 333 - 339
  • [44] Optimising the preoperative planning of deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction
    Casares Santiago, Miguel
    Garcia-Tutor, Emilio
    Rodriguez Caravaca, Gil
    del Cerro Gonzalez, Julian
    Marie Klein, Lea
    Alonso-Burgos, Alberto
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (09) : 2097 - 2108
  • [45] Superficial Temporal Recipient Vessels in Microvascular Orbit and Scalp Reconstruction of Oncologic Defects
    Halvorson, Eric G.
    Cordeiro, Peter G.
    Disa, Joseph J.
    Wallin, Elizabeth F.
    Mehrara, Babak J.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2009, 25 (06) : 383 - 387
  • [46] Unilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction with Bi-pedicled, Conjoined Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps
    Seth, Akhil K.
    Koolen, Pieter G. L.
    Sultan, Steven M.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    Erhard, Heather A.
    Greenspun, David T.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2019, 35 (02) : 145 - 155
  • [47] Enhancing Viability of Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Flaps Using Delay Phenomenon
    Alsheshi, Mohammad
    El-Maaytah, Khalid
    Abu Ashour, Mohammed
    Ritter, Edmond
    El-Qawaqzeh, Khaled
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2025, 94 (04) : 433 - 436
  • [48] To Resect or Not to Resect: The Effects of Rib-Sparing Harvest of the Internal Mammary Vessels in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
    Wilson, Stelios
    Weichman, Katie
    Broer, P. Niclas
    Ahn, Christina Y.
    Allen, Robert J.
    Saadeh, Pierre B.
    Karp, Nolan S.
    Choi, Mihye
    Levine, Jamie P.
    Thanik, Vishal D.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2016, 32 (02) : 94 - 100
  • [49] Internal mammary artery perforator flap for head and neck reconstruction
    Iyer, N. Gopalakrishna
    Clark, Jonathan R.
    Ashford, Bruce G.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 79 (11) : 799 - 803
  • [50] The template technique for breast mound planning when using abdominal flaps for breast reconstruction
    Tregaskiss, Ashley
    Vermaak, Pieter V.
    Boulton, Richard
    Morris, Robert J.
    BREAST, 2012, 21 (05) : 686 - 689