Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) adjunctive therapy for major depressive disorder (MDD) after two antidepressant treatment failures: meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials

被引:23
作者
Vida, Robert Gyorgy [1 ]
Saghy, Eszter [2 ]
Bella, Richard [2 ]
Kovacs, Sandor [2 ]
Erdosi, Dalma [2 ]
Jozwiak-Hagymasy, Judit [2 ]
Zemplenyi, Antal [2 ]
Tenyi, Tamas [3 ]
Osvath, Peter [3 ]
Voros, Viktor [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pecs, Fac Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut, Pecs, Hungary
[2] Univ Pecs, Fac Pharm, Ctr Hlth Technol Assessment & Pharmacoecon Res, Pecs, Hungary
[3] Univ Pecs, Clin Ctr, Med Sch, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Pecs, Hungary
关键词
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); Major depressive disorder (MDD); Treatment-resistant depression (TRD); Meta-analysis; Efficacy; Methodology; TREATMENT-RESISTANT DEPRESSION; DOUBLE-BLIND; NETWORK; SAFETY; CORTEX; ADULTS; SCALE;
D O I
10.1186/s12888-023-05033-y
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
BackgroundSeveral meta-analyses demonstrated the efficacy of unilateral High-Frequency Left-sided (HFL) repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for individuals with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD); however, results are contradictory due to heterogeneity of the included studies.MethodsA systematic literature review (SLR) of English language articles published since 2000 was performed in March 2022 on PubMed and Scopus databases. Empirical evidence on the relative efficacy of rTMS treatment compared with standard pharmacotherapy in Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD) were extracted. Random effects models were used to assess the effects of rTMS on response and remission rates.Results19 randomized double-blinded sham-controlled studies were included for quantitative analysis for response (n = 854 patients) and 9 studies for remission (n = 551 patients). The risk ratio (RR) for response and remission are 2.25 and 2.78, respectively for patients after two treatment failures using rTMS as add-on treatment compared to standard pharmacotherapy. Cochrane's Q test showed no significant heterogeneity. No publication bias was detected.ConclusionsrTMS is significantly more effective than sham rTMS in TRD in response and remission outcomes and may be beneficial as an adjunctive treatment in patients with MDD after two treatment failures. This finding is consistent with previous meta-analyses; however, the effect size was smaller than in the formerly published literature.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) adjunctive therapy for major depressive disorder (MDD) after two antidepressant treatment failures: meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials
    Róbert György Vida
    Eszter Sághy
    Richárd Bella
    Sándor Kovács
    Dalma Erdősi
    Judit Józwiak-Hagymásy
    Antal Zemplényi
    Tamás Tényi
    Péter Osváth
    Viktor Voros
    BMC Psychiatry, 23
  • [2] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): An exploratory meta-analysis of randomized and sham-controlled trials
    Berlim, Marcelo T.
    Neufeld, Nicholas H.
    Van den Eynde, Frederique
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2013, 47 (08) : 999 - 1006
  • [3] Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) on cognitive control
    Corlier, Juliana
    Burnette, Elizabeth
    Wilson, Andrew C.
    Lou, Jerry J.
    Landeros, Adrian
    Minzenberg, Michael J.
    Leuchter, Andrew F.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2020, 265 : 272 - 277
  • [4] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Sham-Controlled Trials of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Bipolar Disorder
    Tee, Maggie M. K.
    Au, C. H.
    PSYCHIATRIC QUARTERLY, 2020, 91 (04) : 1225 - 1247
  • [5] A meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Chen, Chia-Min
    Liang, Shun-Chin
    Sun, Cheuk-Kwan
    Cheng, Yu-Shian
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 46
  • [6] Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of 3 Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Devices for Depression: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trials
    Matsuda, Yuki
    Yamazaki, Ryuichi
    Kishi, Taro
    Iwata, Nakao
    Shigeta, Masahiro
    Kito, Shinsuke
    NEUROPSYCHOBIOLOGY, 2022, 81 (01) : 60 - 68
  • [7] Neurocognitive Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) as an Adjunctive Treatment in Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
    Baruth, Joshua M.
    Sim, Leslie A.
    Croarkin, Paul E.
    Sampson, Shirlene M.
    Wall, Christopher A.
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 71 (08) : 215S - 215S
  • [8] A meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Chen, Chia-Min
    Liang, Shun-Chin
    Sun, Cheuk-Kwan
    Cheng, Yu-Shian
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 46
  • [9] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Sham-Controlled Trials of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Bipolar Disorder
    Maggie M. K. Tee
    C. H. Au
    Psychiatric Quarterly, 2020, 91 : 1225 - 1247
  • [10] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Meta-analysis of Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trials
    Perera, M. Prabhavi N.
    Mallawaarachchi, Sudaraka
    Miljevic, Aleksandra
    Bailey, Neil W.
    Herring, Sally E.
    Fitzgerald, Paul B.
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY-COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING, 2021, 6 (10) : 947 - 960