Best (but often forgotten) Statistical Practices: Measuring Real-World Intervention Effectiveness using Electronic Health Data

被引:0
作者
Wolfson, Julian [1 ]
Venkatasubramaniam, Ashwini [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Div Biostat, Sch Publ Hlth, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, Herts, England
关键词
real-world evidence; electronic health records; causal inference; intervention effectiveness; generalizability; statistical best practices; PROPENSITY SCORE METHODS; POPULATION-BASED COHORT; CAUSAL INFERENCE; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; MEASURED HEIGHT; TARGET TRIAL; NUTRITION; WEIGHT; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.05.006
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
The evidence base supporting the use of most interventions consists primarily of data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but how and to whom interventions are delivered in clinical practice may differ substantially from these foundational RCTs. With the increasing availability of electronic health data, it is now feasible to study the "real-world" effectiveness of a wide range of interventions. However, real-world intervention effectiveness studies using electronic health data face many challenges including data quality, selection bias, confounding by indication, and lack of generalizability. In this article, we describe the key barriers to generating high-quality evidence from real-world intervention effectiveness studies and suggest statistical best practices for addressing them.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 22
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Update on NHANES Dietary Data: Focus on Collection, Release, Analytical Considerations, and Uses to Inform Public Policy [J].
Ahluwalia, Namanjeet ;
Dwyer, Johanna ;
Terry, Ana ;
Moshfegh, Alanna ;
Johnson, Clifford .
ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2016, 7 (01) :121-134
[2]   Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: propensity score methods in clinical nutrition research [J].
Ali, M. Sanni ;
Groenwold, Rolf H. H. ;
Klungel, Olaf H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2016, 104 (02) :247-258
[3]  
Allison P. D., 1995, Survival analysis using SAS: A practical guide
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, An introduction to survival analysis using Stata
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, NOTOD16149 NIH
[6]   Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects [J].
Athey, Susan ;
Imbens, Guido .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (27) :7353-7360
[7]   An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (03) :399-424
[8]   Human postprandial responses to food and potential for precision nutrition [J].
Berry, Sarah E. ;
Valdes, Ana M. ;
Drew, David A. ;
Asnicar, Francesco ;
Mazidi, Mohsen ;
Wolf, Jonathan ;
Capdevila, Joan ;
Hadjigeorgiou, George ;
Davies, Richard ;
Al Khatib, Haya ;
Bonnett, Christopher ;
Ganesh, Sajaysurya ;
Bakker, Elco ;
Hart, Deborah ;
Mangino, Massimo ;
Merino, Jordi ;
Linenberg, Inbar ;
Wyatt, Patrick ;
Ordovas, Jose M. ;
Gardner, Christopher D. ;
Delahanty, Linda M. ;
Chan, Andrew T. ;
Segata, Nicola ;
Franks, Paul W. ;
Spector, Tim D. .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2020, 26 (06) :964-+
[9]   Propensity Score Methods for Confounding Control in Nonexperimental Research [J].
Brookhart, M. Alan ;
Wyss, Richard ;
Layton, J. Bradley ;
Stuerner, Til .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2013, 6 (05) :604-611
[10]   G-computation, propensity score-based methods, and targeted maximum likelihood estimator for causal inference with different covariates sets: a comparative simulation study [J].
Chatton, Arthur ;
Le Borgne, Florent ;
Leyrat, Clemence ;
Gillaizeau, Florence ;
Rousseau, Chloe ;
Barbin, Laetitia ;
Laplaud, David ;
Leger, Maxime ;
Giraudeau, Bruno ;
Foucher, Yohann .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)