A decision-making framework for blockchain platform evaluation in spherical fuzzy environment

被引:22
作者
Bonab, Shabnam Rahnamay [1 ]
Yousefi, Samuel [2 ]
Tosarkani, Babak Mohamadpour [2 ]
Ghoushchi, Saeid Jafarzadeh [1 ]
机构
[1] Urmia Univ Technol, Fac Ind Engn, Orumiyeh, Iran
[2] Univ British Columbia, Sch Engn, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
关键词
Blockchain platform selection; Multi-criteria decision-making; Best-worst method; MARCOS; Spherical fuzzy set;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120833
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Blockchain systems with critical features (e.g., security, flexibility against attacks, and data traceability) have created possibilities for users to develop innovative economic and business models. Despite the abundance and variety of features of blockchain technology, choosing a suitable and reliable blockchain platform is somewhat challenging. Several criteria, including profitability, sustainability, and popularity, should be considered to identify such platforms. Accordingly, this study investigates the blockchain platform evaluation and selection as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. In this regard, we propose an integrated approach based on the extended version of MCDM methods in a spherical fuzzy environment. In the developed approach, the main criteria are weighted using the developed spherical fuzzy best-worst method (SF-BWM) to reduce uncertainty in pairwise comparisons. Then, the 15 blockchain platforms are analyzed and ranked using spherical fuzzy measurement of alternatives and ranking according to the compromise solution (SF-MARCOS). The outputs of the SFBWM-MARCOS approach imply that Bitcoin and Ethereum are placed in the first and second priorities, respectively. The comparison of the results with other MCDM methods and sensitivity analysis demonstrates the performance of the proposed approach and its ranking stability in various scenarios.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[2]  
BlockGeeks, 2016, WHAT IS CRYPT EV YOU
[3]   Blockchain for the Circular Economy: Analysis of the Research-Practice Gap [J].
Boeckel, Alexa ;
Nuzum, Anne-Katrin ;
Weissbrod, Ilka .
SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 25 :525-539
[4]   Logistic autonomous vehicles assessment using decision support model under spherical fuzzy set integrated Choquet Integral approach [J].
Bonab, Shabnam Rahnamay ;
Ghoushchi, Saeid Jafarzadeh ;
Deveci, Muhammet ;
Haseli, Gholamreza .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2023, 214
[5]   Environment risk assessment of wastewater treatment using FMEA method based on Pythagorean fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making [J].
Bonab, Shabnam Rahnamay ;
Osgooei, Elnaz .
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022,
[6]   Supply chain re-engineering using blockchain technology: A case of smart contract based tracking process [J].
Chang, Shuchih Ernest ;
Chen, Yi-Chian ;
Lu, Ming-Fang .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 144 :1-11
[7]  
Crosby M., 2016, Applied Innovation, V2, P6
[8]   A survey of empirical performance evaluation of permissioned blockchain platforms: Challenges and opportunities [J].
Dabbagh, Mohammad ;
Choo, Kim-Kwang Raymond ;
Beheshti, Amin ;
Tahir, Mohammad ;
Safa, Nader Sohrabi .
COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2021, 100
[9]   Selecting the most suitable blockchain platform: A case study on the healthcare industry using a novel rough MCDM framework [J].
Erol, Ismail ;
Oztel, Ahmet ;
Searcy, Cory ;
Medeni, I. Tolga .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2023, 186
[10]   Decision Support for Blockchain Platform Selection: Three Industry Case Studies [J].
Farshidi, Siamak ;
Jansen, Slinger ;
Espana, Sergio ;
Verkleij, Jacco .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2020, 67 (04) :1109-1128