The Regime Complexes for Global Climate Governance

被引:1
作者
Zhang, Lihua [1 ]
Bai, Erhai [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Changchun 130015, Peoples R China
关键词
global climate governance corporate; social responsibility and sustainability; information systems operations management impact analysis; mechanism complex; institutional fragmentation; MULTILEVEL; CONSEQUENCES; FRAGMENTATION; IMPACTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/su15119077
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Climate change is a major challenge for human society in the 21st century and an important issue in the context of sustainable development governance. As the density of institutions in global climate governance increases, so does the potential for overlap and interaction between the various elements of institutions. The current global climate governance issue is no longer solely a state-centric governance model but presents a complex manifestation of a complex of mechanisms. Taking a global climate governance perspective, this paper finds that the institutional complex of global climate governance is shaped by internal factors, such as self-attribution, rights, and interest linkages. External factors include the rapid development of globalization and the non-governmental state of the international community. The internal logic of the institutional complex is based on the institutional fragmentation of multiple interested parties involved in the governance process and the interaction patterns of internal actors. The institutional complex of global climate governance has the following implications for policy-making: the strength of the institutional complex refers to the framework of decision-making; the flexibility of the arguments provides stakeholders with demands related to their interests and inspires different countries to join in the governance of global climate change.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Abbott K, 2009, POLITICS GLOBAL REGU, P44, DOI [10.1515/9781400830732.44, DOI 10.1515/9781400830732.44]
  • [2] The transnational regime complex for climate change
    Abbott, Kenneth W.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2012, 30 (04): : 571 - 590
  • [3] Aggarwal V.K., 1998, I DESIGN, P1, DOI DOI 10.7591/9781501733123-004
  • [4] Does democracy help reduce environmental degradation?
    Akalin, Guray
    Erdogan, Sinan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (06) : 7226 - 7235
  • [5] The Politics of International Regime Complexity
    Alter, Karen J.
    Meunier, Sophie
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS, 2009, 7 (01) : 13 - 24
  • [6] Benvenisti E, 2007, STANFORD LAW REV, V60, P595
  • [7] The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis
    Biermann, Frank
    Pattberg, Philipp
    van Asselt, Harro
    Zelli, Fariborz
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2009, 9 (04) : 14 - +
  • [8] Optimizing the health benefits of climate change policies using health impact assessment
    Dannenberg, Andrew L.
    Rogerson, Bethany
    Rudolph, Linda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY, 2020, 41 (02) : 139 - 154
  • [9] The Power and Peril of International Regime Complexity
    Drezner, Daniel W.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS, 2009, 7 (01) : 65 - 70
  • [10] The global governance complexity cube: Varieties of institutional complexity in global governance
    Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, Mette
    Westerwinter, Oliver
    [J]. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, 2022, 17 (02) : 233 - 262