Does previous transurethral resection of the prostate negatively influence subsequent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men diagnosed with prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Gu, Li [2 ]
Li, Yijian [1 ]
Li, Xurui [1 ]
Liu, Wentao [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Urol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Gastroenterol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Prostate cancer; Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy; Transurethral resection of the prostate; Quality of life; Prognosis; Safety; HOLMIUM LASER ENUCLEATION; OUTCOMES; FEASIBILITY; SURGERY; HISTORY; TURP;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-023-01588-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
It is not uncommon to incidentally discover prostate cancer during the transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and necessitate a subsequent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). The study aims to evaluate whether TURP have negative influence on subsequent RARP. Through a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, 10 studies with 683 patients who underwent RARP after previous TURP and 4039 patients who underwent RARP only were identified for the purposes of the meta-analysis. Compared to standard RARP, RARP after TURP was related to longer operative time (WMD: 29.1 min, 95% CI: 13.3-44.8, P < 0.001), more blood loss (WMD: 49.3 ml, 95% CI: 8.8-89.7, P = 0.02), longer time to catheter removal (WMD: 0.93 days, 95% CI: 0.41-1.44, P < 0.001), higher rates of overall (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.08-1.95, P = 0.01) and major complications (RR: 3.67, 95% Cl: 1.63-8.24, P = 0.002), frequently demand for bladder neck reconstruction (RR: 5.46, 95% CI: 3.15-9.47, P < 0.001) and lower succeed in nerve sparing (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.62-0.87, P < 0.001). In terms of quality of life, there are worse recovery of urinary continence (RR of incontinence rate: RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02-1.52, P = 0.03) and potency (RR: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.73-0.89, P < 0.001) at 1 year in RARP with previous TURP. In addition, the RARP with previous TURP had greater percentage positive margins (RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02-1.52, P = 0.03), while there is no difference in length of stay and biochemical recurrence rate at 1 year. RARP is feasible but challenging after TURP. It significantly increases the difficulty of operation and compromises surgical, functional and oncological outcomes. It is important for urologists and patients to be aware of the negative impact of TURP on subsequent RARP and establish treatment strategies to lessen the adverse effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1307
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robotic-assisted radical resection versus open surgery for cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Jianlin
    Wang, Lei
    Yu, Feng
    Wang, Lunbin
    Leng, Zhengwei
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [32] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Pan, Xiu-wu
    Cui, Xin-ming
    Teng, Jing-fei
    Zhang, Dong-xu
    Wang, Zhi-jun
    Qu, Fa-jun
    Gao, Yi
    Cui, Xin-gang
    Xu, Dan-feng
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 77 : S1326 - S1333
  • [33] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Xiu-wu Pan
    Xin-ming Cui
    Jing-fei Teng
    Dong-xu Zhang
    Zhi-jun Wang
    Fa-jun Qu
    Yi Gao
    Xin-gang Cui
    Dan-feng Xu
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2015, 77 : 1326 - 1333
  • [34] Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: the first separate systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies
    Ma, Jianglei
    Xu, Weidong
    Chen, Rui
    Zhu, Yasheng
    Wang, Ye
    Cao, Wanli
    Ju, Guanqun
    Ren, Jizhong
    Ye, Xiaofei
    He, Qian
    Chang, Yifan
    Ren, Shancheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 109 (05) : 1350 - 1359
  • [35] Lower vs standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    El-Taji, Omar
    Howell-Etienne, Jack
    Taktak, Samih
    Hanchanale, Vishwanath
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (02) : 303 - 312
  • [36] The role of radical prostatectomy for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Yi
    Qin, Zhiqiang
    Wang, Yamin
    Chen, Chen
    Wang, Yichun
    Meng, Xianghu
    Song, Ninghong
    BIOSCIENCE REPORTS, 2018, 38
  • [37] Lower vs standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Omar El-Taji
    Jack Howell-Etienne
    Samih Taktak
    Vishwanath Hanchanale
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 303 - 312
  • [38] Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ayer Botrel, Tobias Engel
    Clark, Otavio
    Horta Bretas, Francisco Flavio
    Sadi, Marcus V.
    Ferreira, Ubirajara
    Paladini, Luciano
    Matheus, Wagner Eduardo
    Reis, Rodolfo
    Duraes, Ronilson Oliveira
    Lima Pompeu, Antonio Carlos
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (06)
  • [39] Does transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) compromise the subsequent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) outcomes?
    Han, M
    Smith, ND
    Catalona, WJ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 211 - 212
  • [40] Does transurethral resection of the prostate before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy have adverse effects on patients diagnosed with prostate cancer: a comparative evidence-based analysis?
    Hu, Anneng
    Lin, Yuhang
    Zhu, Xiaole
    Li, Junyang
    Luo, Fuwen
    Yu, Xiaodong
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2025, 19 (01)