Life cycle assessment for sustainability assessment of biofuels and bioproducts

被引:72
|
作者
Gheewala, Shabbir H. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi, Joint Grad Sch Energy & Environm, 126 Prachauthit Rd, Tungkru 10140, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Minist Higher Educ Sci Res & Innovat, Ctr Excellence Energy Technol & Environm CEE, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Diponegoro Univ, Sch Postgrad Studies, Semarang 50241, Central Java, Indonesia
[4] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
来源
BIOFUEL RESEARCH JOURNAL-BRJ | 2023年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
Biofuel; Biomaterial; Biorefinery; Greenhouse gas; Life cycle assessment; Sustainable development; BIOENERGY; UNCERTAINTY; CARBON; FOOD; LCA;
D O I
10.18331/BRJ2023.10.1.5
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Bio-based materials have been used traditionally for millennia. Their use was overtaken in recent times by the discovery and utilization of fossil-based resources for materials and energy. However, concerns about the non-renewability of fossil resources and greenhouse gas and other emissions associated with their use have brought forth a renewed interest in using bio-based materials in recent years. The environmental advantages of bio-based materials cannot be taken for granted without a rigorous scientific assessment. Many tools based on energy, economics, and environmental impacts have been used. Life cycle assessment is one such tool developed and successfully utilized for the environmental assessment of biofuels and bioproducts. However, many methodological challenges, among other things related to system boundaries, functional units, allocation, and carbon accounting, still need further research and consideration. In this work, the related issues are summarized, and the directions for addressing them are discussed. Despite the methodological challenges in their assessment, biofuels and bioproducts show promise in terms of their environmental advantages compared to their fossil-oriented counterparts. These advantages can be further enhanced by utilizing all parts of the feedstock biomass, especially for value-added materials and chemicals via biorefineries.(c) 2023 BRTeam. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1810 / 1815
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle sustainability assessment method for concrete
    Choi, Wonyoung
    Tae, Sungho
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [22] Principles for the application of life cycle sustainability assessment
    Sonia Valdivia
    Jana Gerta Backes
    Marzia Traverso
    Guido Sonnemann
    Stefano Cucurachi
    Jeroen B. Guinée
    Thomas Schaubroeck
    Matthias Finkbeiner
    Noemie Leroy-Parmentier
    Cássia Ugaya
    Claudia Peña
    Alessandra Zamagni
    Atsushi Inaba
    Milena Amaral
    Markus Berger
    Jolanta Dvarioniene
    Tatiana Vakhitova
    Catherine Benoit-Norris
    Martina Prox
    Rajendra Foolmaun
    Mark Goedkoop
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 1900 - 1905
  • [23] It's Complicated: Corporate Sustainability and the Uneasiness of Life Cycle Assessment
    Freidberg, Susanne
    SCIENCE AS CULTURE, 2015, 24 (02) : 157 - 182
  • [24] A transdisciplinary review of the role of economics in life cycle sustainability assessment
    Hall, Murray R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (12) : 1625 - 1639
  • [25] Life cycle assessment of campuses: A systematic review
    Qiu, Yu
    Dong, Yahong
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2024, 319
  • [26] A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Analysis of Liquid Biofuels Production
    Koroneos, Christopher
    Anastasiou, Foteini
    Diatrios, Rovas
    COMPUTING AND COMPUTATIONAL TECHNIQUES IN SCIENCES, 2008, : 218 - +
  • [27] THE APPROACH OF LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF BIOREFINERIES
    Jungmeier, G.
    Hingsamer, M.
    Steiner, D.
    Kaltenegger, I.
    Kleinegris, D.
    Van Ree, R.
    de Jong, E.
    PAPERS OF THE 24TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2016, : 1660 - 1665
  • [28] Framework for integrating animal welfare into life cycle sustainability assessment
    Laura Scherer
    Brian Tomasik
    Oscar Rueda
    Stephan Pfister
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 1476 - 1490
  • [29] Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Geotechnical Ground Improvement Methods
    Raymond, Alena J.
    DeJong, Jason T.
    Kendall, Alissa
    Blackburn, J. Tanner
    Deschamps, Rick
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 147 (12)
  • [30] Ecological Footprint and Life Cycle Assessment in the sustainability assessment of tourism activities
    Castellani, Valentina
    Sala, Serenella
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 16 : 135 - 147