Life cycle assessment for sustainability assessment of biofuels and bioproducts

被引:72
|
作者
Gheewala, Shabbir H. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi, Joint Grad Sch Energy & Environm, 126 Prachauthit Rd, Tungkru 10140, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Minist Higher Educ Sci Res & Innovat, Ctr Excellence Energy Technol & Environm CEE, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Diponegoro Univ, Sch Postgrad Studies, Semarang 50241, Central Java, Indonesia
[4] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
来源
BIOFUEL RESEARCH JOURNAL-BRJ | 2023年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
Biofuel; Biomaterial; Biorefinery; Greenhouse gas; Life cycle assessment; Sustainable development; BIOENERGY; UNCERTAINTY; CARBON; FOOD; LCA;
D O I
10.18331/BRJ2023.10.1.5
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Bio-based materials have been used traditionally for millennia. Their use was overtaken in recent times by the discovery and utilization of fossil-based resources for materials and energy. However, concerns about the non-renewability of fossil resources and greenhouse gas and other emissions associated with their use have brought forth a renewed interest in using bio-based materials in recent years. The environmental advantages of bio-based materials cannot be taken for granted without a rigorous scientific assessment. Many tools based on energy, economics, and environmental impacts have been used. Life cycle assessment is one such tool developed and successfully utilized for the environmental assessment of biofuels and bioproducts. However, many methodological challenges, among other things related to system boundaries, functional units, allocation, and carbon accounting, still need further research and consideration. In this work, the related issues are summarized, and the directions for addressing them are discussed. Despite the methodological challenges in their assessment, biofuels and bioproducts show promise in terms of their environmental advantages compared to their fossil-oriented counterparts. These advantages can be further enhanced by utilizing all parts of the feedstock biomass, especially for value-added materials and chemicals via biorefineries.(c) 2023 BRTeam. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1810 / 1815
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A critical review of biochemical conversion, sustainability and life cycle assessment of algal biofuels
    Singh, Anoop
    Olsen, Stig Irving
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2011, 88 (10) : 3548 - 3555
  • [2] Conversion of biomass to biofuels and life cycle assessment: a review
    Ahmed I. Osman
    Neha Mehta
    Ahmed M. Elgarahy
    Amer Al-Hinai
    Ala’a H. Al-Muhtaseb
    David W. Rooney
    Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2021, 19 : 4075 - 4118
  • [3] Conversion of biomass to biofuels and life cycle assessment: a review
    Osman, Ahmed, I
    Mehta, Neha
    Elgarahy, Ahmed M.
    Al-Hinai, Amer
    Al-Muhtaseb, Ala'a H.
    Rooney, David W.
    ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2021, 19 (06) : 4075 - 4118
  • [4] A unified framework of life cycle assessment
    Yang, Yi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2019, 24 (04) : 620 - 626
  • [5] Critical indicators of sustainability for biofuels: An analysis through a life cycle sustainabilty assessment perspective
    Collotta, M.
    Champagne, P.
    Tomasoni, G.
    Alberti, M.
    Busi, L.
    Mabee, W.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 115
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of biofuels in Thailand: Implications of environmental trade-offs for policy decisions
    Lecksiwilai, Naruetep
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2020, 22 : 177 - 185
  • [7] Comparison of Life Cycle Impact Assessment tools in the case of biofuels
    Landis, Amy E.
    Theis, Thomas L.
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2008, : 7 - +
  • [8] Life cycle assessment, electricity generation and sustainability
    Aumonier, S
    NUCLEAR ENERGY-JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH NUCLEAR ENERGY SOCIETY, 1998, 37 (05): : 295 - 302
  • [9] Principles for the application of life cycle sustainability assessment
    Valdivia, Sonia
    Backes, Jana Gerta
    Traverso, Marzia
    Sonnemann, Guido
    Cucurachi, Stefano
    Guinee, Jeroen B.
    Schaubroeck, Thomas
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    Leroy-Parmentier, Noemie
    Ugaya, Cassia
    Pena, Claudia
    Zamagni, Alessandra
    Inaba, Atsushi
    Amaral, Milena
    Berger, Markus
    Dvarioniene, Jolanta
    Vakhitova, Tatiana
    Benoit-Norris, Catherine
    Prox, Martina
    Foolmaun, Rajendra
    Goedkoop, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (09) : 1900 - 1905
  • [10] Study on Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Buildings: A Review
    Basu, Manali
    Kaja, Nagaraju
    Rao, Prashanti
    Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 2024, 105 (03) : 749 - 766