Perceptions and Early Outcomes of the Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the United States

被引:7
作者
Pawlak, Natalie [1 ]
Song, Cherilyn [1 ]
Alvi, Saba [1 ]
Schuster, Kimberly [1 ]
Segalini, Nicole [1 ]
Kwon, Yong K. [2 ]
Akoad, Mohamed E. [3 ]
Rauf, M. Ameen [4 ]
Mulligan, David [5 ]
Aziz, Hassan [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Div Transplant & Hepatobiliary Surg, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Div Transplant & Hepatobiliary Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Lahey Hosp & Med Ctr, Div Transplant & Hepatobiliary Surg, Boston, MA USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Div Hepatobiliary Surg & Liver Transplantat, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Yale Sch Med, Div Transplantat Surg & Immunol, New Haven, CT USA
[6] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Div Transplant & Hepatobiliary Surg, Iowa City, IA USA
[7] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Div Transplant & Hepatobiliary Surg, 200 Hawkins Dr 4802,C-41-S, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
来源
TRANSPLANTATION DIRECT | 2023年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/TXD.0000000000001427
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background.Recently, a new liver allocation policy called the acuity circles (AC) framework was implemented to decrease geographic disparities in transplant metrics across donor service areas. Early analyses have examined the changes in outcomes because of the AC policy. However, perceptions among transplant surgeons and staff regarding the new policy remain unknown. Methods.A 28-item survey was sent to division chiefs and surgical directors of liver transplantation across the United States. Questions assessed the respondents' perceptions regarding center-level metrics and staff satisfaction. We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data to study differences in allocation between the pre-AC implementation period (2019) and the post-AC implementation period (2020-2021). Results.A total of 40 participants completed this ongoing survey study. Most responses were from region 8 (13%), region 10 (15%), and region 11 (13%). Sixty-three percent of respondents stated that the wait time for a suitable offer for recipients with model of end-stage liver disease score <30 has decreased, whereas 50% stated that wait time for a suitable offer for recipients with model of end-stage liver disease score >30 has increased. However, most respondents (75%) felt that the average cost per transplant had increased and that the rate of surgical complications and 1-y graft survival had remained the same. In most states, an observable decrease in in-state liver transplantations occurred each year between 2019 and 2021. In addition, most allocation regions reported an increase in donations after circulatory deaths between 2019 and 2021. Conclusions.Perceptions of the new AC policy among liver transplant surgeons in the United States remain mixed, highlighting the potential strengths and concerns regarding its future impact. Further studies should assess the effects of the AC policy on clinical outcomes and liver transplantation access.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [11] Cost Analysis of Liver Acquisition Fees Before and After Acuity Circle Policy Implementation
    Wall, Anji E.
    da Graca, Briget
    Asrani, Sumeet K.
    Ruiz, Richard
    Fernandez, Hoylan
    Gupta, Amar
    Martinez, Eric
    Bayer, Johanna
    McKenna, Gregory J.
    Goldstein, Robert
    Onaca, Nicholas
    Trotter, James F.
    Testa, Giuliano
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2021, 156 (11) : 1051 - 1057
  • [12] The Effect of Acuity Circles on Deceased Donor Transplant and Offer Rates Across Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Scores and Exception Statuses
    Wey, Andrew
    Noreen, Samantha
    Gentry, Sommer
    Cafarella, Matt
    Trotter, James
    Salkowski, Nicholas
    Segev, Dorry
    Israni, Ajay
    Kasiske, Bertram
    Hirose, Ryutaro
    Snyder, Jon
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 28 (03) : 363 - 375
  • [13] Changing opportunities for liver transplant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
    Zendel, Alex
    Watkins, Randall
    Moon, Andrew M.
    Gerber, David A.
    Barritt, A. Sidney
    Desai, Chirag S.
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 36 (05)