Perceptions and Early Outcomes of the Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the United States

被引:7
作者
Pawlak, Natalie [1 ]
Song, Cherilyn [1 ]
Alvi, Saba [1 ]
Schuster, Kimberly [1 ]
Segalini, Nicole [1 ]
Kwon, Yong K. [2 ]
Akoad, Mohamed E. [3 ]
Rauf, M. Ameen [4 ]
Mulligan, David [5 ]
Aziz, Hassan [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Div Transplant & Hepatobiliary Surg, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Div Transplant & Hepatobiliary Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Lahey Hosp & Med Ctr, Div Transplant & Hepatobiliary Surg, Boston, MA USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Div Hepatobiliary Surg & Liver Transplantat, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Yale Sch Med, Div Transplantat Surg & Immunol, New Haven, CT USA
[6] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Div Transplant & Hepatobiliary Surg, Iowa City, IA USA
[7] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Div Transplant & Hepatobiliary Surg, 200 Hawkins Dr 4802,C-41-S, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
来源
TRANSPLANTATION DIRECT | 2023年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/TXD.0000000000001427
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background.Recently, a new liver allocation policy called the acuity circles (AC) framework was implemented to decrease geographic disparities in transplant metrics across donor service areas. Early analyses have examined the changes in outcomes because of the AC policy. However, perceptions among transplant surgeons and staff regarding the new policy remain unknown. Methods.A 28-item survey was sent to division chiefs and surgical directors of liver transplantation across the United States. Questions assessed the respondents' perceptions regarding center-level metrics and staff satisfaction. We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data to study differences in allocation between the pre-AC implementation period (2019) and the post-AC implementation period (2020-2021). Results.A total of 40 participants completed this ongoing survey study. Most responses were from region 8 (13%), region 10 (15%), and region 11 (13%). Sixty-three percent of respondents stated that the wait time for a suitable offer for recipients with model of end-stage liver disease score <30 has decreased, whereas 50% stated that wait time for a suitable offer for recipients with model of end-stage liver disease score >30 has increased. However, most respondents (75%) felt that the average cost per transplant had increased and that the rate of surgical complications and 1-y graft survival had remained the same. In most states, an observable decrease in in-state liver transplantations occurred each year between 2019 and 2021. In addition, most allocation regions reported an increase in donations after circulatory deaths between 2019 and 2021. Conclusions.Perceptions of the new AC policy among liver transplant surgeons in the United States remain mixed, highlighting the potential strengths and concerns regarding its future impact. Further studies should assess the effects of the AC policy on clinical outcomes and liver transplantation access.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] A 6-Month Report on the Impact of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing Acuity Circles Policy Change
    Chyou, Darius
    Karp, Seth
    Shah, Malay B.
    Lynch, Raymond
    Goldberg, David S.
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 27 (05) : 756 - 759
  • [2] Donations After Circulatory Death in Liver Transplant
    Eren, Emre A.
    Latchana, Nicholas
    Beal, Eliza
    Hayes, Don, Jr.
    Whitson, Bryan
    Black, Sylvester M.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 14 (05) : 463 - 470
  • [4] Acuity Circles-Higher Cost for Fewer Transplants?
    Karp, Seth J.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2021, 156 (11) : 1058 - 1058
  • [5] OPTN/SRTR 2020 Annual Data Report: Liver
    Kwong, A. J.
    Ebel, N. H.
    Kim, W. R.
    Lake, J. R.
    Smith, J. M.
    Schladt, D. P.
    Skeans, M. A.
    Foutz, J.
    Gauntt, K.
    Cafarella, M.
    Snyder, J. J.
    Israni, A. K.
    Kasiske, B. L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 22 : 204 - 309
  • [6] Geographic Disparities in Liver Availability: Accidents of Geography, or Consequences of Poor Social Policy?
    Ladin, K.
    Zhang, G.
    Hanto, D. W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 17 (09) : 2277 - 2284
  • [7] Early Changes in Liver Distribution Following Implementation of Share 35
    Massie, A. B.
    Chow, E. K. H.
    Wickliffe, C. E.
    Luo, X.
    Gentry, S. E.
    Mulligan, D. C.
    Segev, D. L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 15 (03) : 659 - 667
  • [8] OPTN UNOS, 2018, LIV INT DISTR US DIS
  • [9] Outcome of a Change in Allocation of Livers for Transplant in the United States
    Sheetz, Kyle H.
    Waits, Seth A.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2021, 156 (05) : 496 - 498
  • [10] United Network for Organ Sharing, System notice: liver and intestinal organ distribution based on acuity circles implemented