Social network risk factors and COVID-19 vaccination: A cross-sectional survey study

被引:1
|
作者
Memedovich, Ally [1 ,2 ]
Orr, Taylor [1 ,2 ]
Hollis, Aidan [3 ]
Salmon, Charleen [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Jia [1 ,2 ]
Zinszer, Kate [4 ,5 ]
Williamson, Tyler [1 ,2 ]
Beall, Reed F. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, OBrien Inst Publ Hlth, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Econ, 2500 Univ Dr NW, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Montreal, Ctr Publ Hlth Res, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Community Hlth Sci, 3280 Hosp Dr,Off 3E46, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; vaccines; Social networks; Health behaviours; Public opinions; Vaccination; /; psychology; PREDICTORS; ATTITUDES; HESITANCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.012
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Social networks have an important impact on our health behaviours, including vaccination. People's vaccination beliefs tend to mirror those of their social network. As social networks are homogenous in many ways, we sought to determine in the context of COVID-19 which factors were most predictive of belonging to a mostly vaccinated or unvaccinated social group. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among Canadian residents in November and December 2021. Participants were asked about the vaccination status of their social networks their beliefs relating to COVID-19, and various sociodemographic factors. Respondents were split into three groups based on social network vaccination: low-, medium-, and high-risk. Chi-squared tests tested associations between factors and risk groups, and an ordinal logistic model was created to determine their direction and strength. Results: Most respondents (81.1 %) were classified as low risk (i.e., a mostly vaccinated social network) and few respondents (3.7 %) were classified as high-risk (i.e., an unvaccinated social group). Both the chi-square test (29.2 % difference between the low- and high- risk groups [1.8 % vs. 31.0 %], p < 0.001) and the ordinal logistic model (odds ratio between the low- and high-risk groups: 14.45, p < 0.01) found that respondents' perceptions of COVID-19 as a "not at all serious" risk to Canadians was the most powerful predictor of belonging to a predominantly unvaccinated social circle. The model also found that those in mostly unvaccinated social circles also more often reported severe COVID-19 symptoms (odds ratio between the low- and high-risk groups: 2.26, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Perception of COVID-19 as a threat to others may signal communities with lower vaccination coverage and higher risk of severe outcomes. This may have implications for strategies to improve public outreach, messaging, and planning for downstream consequences of low intervention uptake.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 911
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Perceptions and beliefs on vaccination for COVID-19 in Delhi: A cross-sectional study
    Sharma, Abha
    Srivastava, Anshuman
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SPECIALITIES, 2021, 12 (03) : 151 - 154
  • [22] Awareness and Attitude Towards COVID-19 Vaccination and Associated Factors in Ethiopia: Cross-Sectional Study
    Mesesle, Molalegn
    INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2021, 14 : 2193 - 2199
  • [23] Factors affecting the community's attitude toward COVID-19 vaccination: cross-sectional study
    Amalo, Chintia Gracelia
    Ekaristy, Ezra Amarya
    Wattileo, Maretty
    Pakpahan, Martina
    Silitonga, Ester
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2023, 76
  • [24] COVID-19 vaccination intent in university students and influencing factors: An analytical cross-sectional study
    Jafar, Daizi
    Nasir, Alia
    Hussain, Amber
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 73 (04) : 776 - 780
  • [25] Study of risk factors and psychological impact in physicians diagnosed with COVID-19: An online, postexposure, cross-sectional survey
    Bajaj, Jhanvi S.
    Solanki, Sohan Lal
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 36 (03) : 345 - +
  • [26] Factors influencing Jordanian parents' COVID-19 vaccination decision for children: A cross-sectional study
    Alosta, Mohammad R.
    Alsadi, Mohammad
    Othman, Elham H.
    Khalifeh, Anas H.
    Atiyeh, Huda
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2024, 77 : 45 - 52
  • [27] Changes in Parental Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccination and Routine Childhood Vaccination During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Repeated Cross-sectional Survey Study
    Wang, Qiang
    Xiu, Shixin
    Yang, Liuqing
    Han, Ying
    Cui, Tingting
    Shi, Naiyang
    Liu, Minqi
    Yi, Youqin
    Liu, Chang
    Wang, Xuwen
    Yang, Guoping
    Ji, Lili
    Zhou, Weijie
    Jin, Hui
    Zhen, Shiqi
    Lin, Leesa
    JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2022, 8 (05):
  • [28] Risk perceptions of COVID-19 in Beijing: a cross-sectional study
    Liu, Qing
    Tan, Yiyang
    Zhu, Zheng
    Zhang, Jiawei
    Fu, Yaqun
    Wang, Quan
    Nie, Zhijie
    Yang, Li
    Li, Xiaoguang
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [29] COVID-19 risk perceptions in Japan: a cross-sectional study
    Chiba, Asako
    Nakata, Taisuke
    Nguyen, Thuy Linh
    Takaku, Reo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [30] Jobs, Housing, and Mask Wearing: Cross-Sectional Study of Risk Factors for COVID-19
    van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline M.
    Atherly, Adam J.
    Diehl, Sean A.
    Gleason, Kelsey M.
    Hart, Victoria C.
    MacLean, Charles D.
    Barkhuff, Daniel A.
    Levine, Mark A.
    Carney, Jan K.
    JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2021, 7 (01): : 151 - 160