Social network risk factors and COVID-19 vaccination: A cross-sectional survey study

被引:3
作者
Memedovich, Ally [1 ,2 ]
Orr, Taylor [1 ,2 ]
Hollis, Aidan [3 ]
Salmon, Charleen [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Jia [1 ,2 ]
Zinszer, Kate [4 ,5 ]
Williamson, Tyler [1 ,2 ]
Beall, Reed F. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, OBrien Inst Publ Hlth, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Econ, 2500 Univ Dr NW, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Montreal, Ctr Publ Hlth Res, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Community Hlth Sci, 3280 Hosp Dr,Off 3E46, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; vaccines; Social networks; Health behaviours; Public opinions; Vaccination; /; psychology; PREDICTORS; ATTITUDES; HESITANCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.012
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Social networks have an important impact on our health behaviours, including vaccination. People's vaccination beliefs tend to mirror those of their social network. As social networks are homogenous in many ways, we sought to determine in the context of COVID-19 which factors were most predictive of belonging to a mostly vaccinated or unvaccinated social group. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among Canadian residents in November and December 2021. Participants were asked about the vaccination status of their social networks their beliefs relating to COVID-19, and various sociodemographic factors. Respondents were split into three groups based on social network vaccination: low-, medium-, and high-risk. Chi-squared tests tested associations between factors and risk groups, and an ordinal logistic model was created to determine their direction and strength. Results: Most respondents (81.1 %) were classified as low risk (i.e., a mostly vaccinated social network) and few respondents (3.7 %) were classified as high-risk (i.e., an unvaccinated social group). Both the chi-square test (29.2 % difference between the low- and high- risk groups [1.8 % vs. 31.0 %], p < 0.001) and the ordinal logistic model (odds ratio between the low- and high-risk groups: 14.45, p < 0.01) found that respondents' perceptions of COVID-19 as a "not at all serious" risk to Canadians was the most powerful predictor of belonging to a predominantly unvaccinated social circle. The model also found that those in mostly unvaccinated social circles also more often reported severe COVID-19 symptoms (odds ratio between the low- and high-risk groups: 2.26, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Perception of COVID-19 as a threat to others may signal communities with lower vaccination coverage and higher risk of severe outcomes. This may have implications for strategies to improve public outreach, messaging, and planning for downstream consequences of low intervention uptake.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 911
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The association of conspiracy beliefs and the uptake of COVID-19 vaccination: a cross-sectional study
    Kowalska-Duplaga, Kinga
    Duplaga, Mariusz
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [2] Social Media Engagement and Influenza Vaccination During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey Study
    Benis, Arriel
    Khodos, Anna
    Ran, Sivan
    Levner, Eugene
    Ashkenazi, Shai
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (03)
  • [3] Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in South Korea: A cross-sectional study
    Chung, Sophia Jihey
    Han, Kihye
    Kim, Chaehee
    Kim, Jieun
    NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2023, 25 (03) : 332 - 340
  • [4] COVID-19 vaccination intention in the UK: results from the COVID-19 vaccination acceptability study (CoVAccS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey
    Sherman, Susan M.
    Smith, Louise E.
    Sim, Julius
    Amlot, Richard
    Cutts, Megan
    Dasch, Hannah
    Rubin, G. James
    Sevdalis, Nick
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2021, 17 (06) : 1612 - 1621
  • [5] Factors influencing COVID-19 vaccination intention among overseas and domestic Chinese university students: a cross-sectional survey
    Wang, Hanqian
    Zhou, Xudong
    Jiang, Tianyu
    Wang, Xiaomin
    Lu, Jingjing
    Li, Jinlin
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2021, 17 (12) : 4829 - 4837
  • [6] Attitudes and Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination Among Nurses and Midwives in Cyprus: A Cross-Sectional Survey
    Fakonti, Georgia
    Kyprianidou, Maria
    Toumbis, Giannos
    Giannakou, Konstantinos
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [7] Public opinion on a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy in France: a cross-sectional survey
    Gagneux-Brunon, Amandine
    Botelho-Nevers, Elisabeth
    Bonneton, Marion
    Peretti-Watel, Patrick
    Verger, Pierre
    Launay, Odile
    Ward, Jeremy K.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2022, 28 (03) : 433 - 439
  • [8] Views on COVID-19 vaccination of young children in Ireland, results from a cross-sectional survey of parents
    Marron, Louise
    Ferenczi, Annamaria
    O'Brien, Katie M.
    Cotter, Suzanne
    Jessop, Lucy
    Morrissey, Yvonne
    Migone, Chantal
    VACCINE, 2022, 40 (39) : 5716 - 5725
  • [9] A cross-sectional regional study looking at the factors responsible for the low COVID-19 vaccination rate in Nigeria
    Ekowo, Onyekachi Ezekiel
    Manafa, Chibuzo
    Isielu, Ruphina Chidiebere
    Okoli, Chinedu Michael
    Chikodi, Ibe
    Onwuasoanya, Azuka Favour
    Echendu, Sylvia Tochukwu
    Ihedoro, Ifeanyichukwu
    Nwabueze, Uchenna Dean
    Nwoke, Obinna Chidubem
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 41
  • [10] Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination status: A cross-sectional study of California students in higher education
    Dougan, Marcelle M.
    Buckner, Anji
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2023, 36