Social network risk factors and COVID-19 vaccination: A cross-sectional survey study

被引:1
|
作者
Memedovich, Ally [1 ,2 ]
Orr, Taylor [1 ,2 ]
Hollis, Aidan [3 ]
Salmon, Charleen [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Jia [1 ,2 ]
Zinszer, Kate [4 ,5 ]
Williamson, Tyler [1 ,2 ]
Beall, Reed F. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, OBrien Inst Publ Hlth, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Econ, 2500 Univ Dr NW, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Montreal, Ctr Publ Hlth Res, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Community Hlth Sci, 3280 Hosp Dr,Off 3E46, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; vaccines; Social networks; Health behaviours; Public opinions; Vaccination; /; psychology; PREDICTORS; ATTITUDES; HESITANCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.012
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Social networks have an important impact on our health behaviours, including vaccination. People's vaccination beliefs tend to mirror those of their social network. As social networks are homogenous in many ways, we sought to determine in the context of COVID-19 which factors were most predictive of belonging to a mostly vaccinated or unvaccinated social group. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among Canadian residents in November and December 2021. Participants were asked about the vaccination status of their social networks their beliefs relating to COVID-19, and various sociodemographic factors. Respondents were split into three groups based on social network vaccination: low-, medium-, and high-risk. Chi-squared tests tested associations between factors and risk groups, and an ordinal logistic model was created to determine their direction and strength. Results: Most respondents (81.1 %) were classified as low risk (i.e., a mostly vaccinated social network) and few respondents (3.7 %) were classified as high-risk (i.e., an unvaccinated social group). Both the chi-square test (29.2 % difference between the low- and high- risk groups [1.8 % vs. 31.0 %], p < 0.001) and the ordinal logistic model (odds ratio between the low- and high-risk groups: 14.45, p < 0.01) found that respondents' perceptions of COVID-19 as a "not at all serious" risk to Canadians was the most powerful predictor of belonging to a predominantly unvaccinated social circle. The model also found that those in mostly unvaccinated social circles also more often reported severe COVID-19 symptoms (odds ratio between the low- and high-risk groups: 2.26, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Perception of COVID-19 as a threat to others may signal communities with lower vaccination coverage and higher risk of severe outcomes. This may have implications for strategies to improve public outreach, messaging, and planning for downstream consequences of low intervention uptake.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 911
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Social Media Engagement and Influenza Vaccination During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey Study
    Benis, Arriel
    Khodos, Anna
    Ran, Sivan
    Levner, Eugene
    Ashkenazi, Shai
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (03)
  • [2] Behavioral Factors Associated with COVID-19 Risk: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Japan
    Ochi, Sae
    So, Mirai
    Hashimoto, Sora
    Denda, Kenzo
    Sekizawa, Yoichi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (22)
  • [3] COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination Against COVID-19 Are Risk Factors for Development of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study in Veterans
    Parsi, Arash Oliver
    Zhou, Qiqi
    Verne, George Nicholas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : S501 - S502
  • [4] Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in South Korea: A cross-sectional study
    Chung, Sophia Jihey
    Han, Kihye
    Kim, Chaehee
    Kim, Jieun
    NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2023, 25 (03) : 332 - 340
  • [5] Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination behaviour in Latvian population: cross-sectional study
    Surina, Sanita
    Martinsone, Kristine
    Upesleja, Gatis
    Perepjolkina, Viktorija
    HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (01): : 514 - 536
  • [6] COVID-19 vaccination intent and associated factors in healthcare workers: cross-sectional study
    Zhelyazkova, A.
    Kim, S.
    Klein, M.
    Prueckner, S.
    Horster, S.
    Kressirer, P.
    Chouker, A.
    Coenen, M.
    Adorjan, K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 32 : III433 - III433
  • [7] COVID-19 vaccination intention and influencing factors among different occupational risk groups: a cross-sectional study
    Jiang, Tianyu
    Zhou, Xudong
    Wang, Hanqian
    Dong, Shixin
    Wang, Menmen
    Akezhuoli, Hailati
    Zhu, Hui
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2021, 17 (10) : 3433 - 3440
  • [8] COVID-19 Vaccination Personas in Syria: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Survey
    Nikoloski, Zlatko
    Aliyev, Elnur
    Bain, Robert E. S.
    Menchini, Leonardo
    Hegazi, Sahar
    Zalkha, Mai
    Mouawad, Shaza
    Kapil, Neha
    Gillespie, Amaya M. M.
    VACCINES, 2023, 11 (06)
  • [9] Influenza Vaccination During COVID-19 in a Rural Community: A Cross-sectional Survey
    Marcus, Rebecca E.
    Kolade, Victor O.
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2022, 47 (02) : 226 - 231
  • [10] Caregivers' intentions to COVID-19 vaccination for their children in China: a cross-sectional survey
    Feng, Huangyufei
    Zhu, He
    Zhang, Haijun
    Cao, Lingsheng
    Li, Li
    Wang, Jiaohao
    Huang, Yingzhe
    Lai, Xiaozhen
    Lyu, Yun
    Jing, Rize
    Guo, Jia
    Yin, Zundong
    Fang, Hai
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2021, 17 (12) : 4799 - 4805