A comparison of seven innovative robotic weeding systems and reference herbicide strategies in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris L.) and rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)

被引:13
|
作者
Gerhards, Roland [1 ]
Risser, Peter [2 ]
Spaeth, Michael [1 ]
Saile, Marcus [1 ]
Peteinatos, Gerassimos [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hohenheim, Weed Sci Dept, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Sudzucker AG, Res Farm Kirschgartshausen, Mannheim, Germany
[3] Hellen Agr Org ELGO DIMITRA, Athens, Greece
关键词
artificial intelligence; in-row hoeing; precision farming; sensor technologies; spot-spraying; MANAGEMENT; CROPS;
D O I
10.1111/wre.12603
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
More than 40 weeding robots have become commercially available, with most restricted to use in crops or fallow applications. The machines differ in their sensor systems for navigation and weed/crop detection, weeding tools and degree of automation. We tested seven robotic weeding systems in sugar beet and winter oil-seed rape in 2021 and 2022 at two locations in Southwestern Germany. Weed and crop density and working rate were measured. Robots were evaluated based on weed control efficacy (WCE), crop stand loss (CL), herbicide savings and treatment costs. All robots reduced weed density at least equal to the standard herbicide treatment. Band-spraying and inter-row hoeing with RTK-GPS guidance achieved 75%-83% herbicide savings. When hoeing and band spraying were applied simultaneously in one pass, WCE was much lower (66%) compared to the same treatments in two separate passes with 95% WCE. Hoeing robots Farmdroid-FD20 (R), Farming Revolution-W4 (R) and KULTi-Select (R) (+finger weeder) controlled 92%-94% of the weeds. The integration of Amazone spot spraying (R) into the FD20 inter-row and intra-row hoeing system did not further increase WCE. All treatments caused less than 5% CL except for the W4-robot with 40% CL and the combination of conventional inter-row hoeing and harrowing (21% CL). KULT-Vision Control (R) inter-row hoeing with the automatic hydraulic side-shift control resulted in 80% WCE with only 2% CL. Due to the low driving speed of maximum 1 km h(-1) of hoeing robots with in-row elements, treatment costs were high at 555-804 (sic)ha(-1) compared to camera-guided inter-row hoeing at 221 (sic) ha(-1) and broadcast herbicide application at 307-383 (sic)ha(-1). Even though the costs of robotic weed management are still high, this study shows that robotic weeding has become a robust, and effective weed control method with great potential to save herbicides in arable and vegetable crops.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 53
页数:12
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Effect of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivation on soil organic carbon stocks in Germany
    Grunwald, Dennis
    Poeplau, Christopher
    Koch, Heinz-Josef
    Jacobs, Anna
    SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 41 (01)
  • [2] Soil surface cover on irrigated rotations for potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), and soft white spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in southern Alberta
    Larney, F. J.
    Pearson, D. C.
    Blackshaw, R. E.
    Lupwayi, N. Z.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2017, 72 (06) : 584 - 596
  • [3] The Influence of Wetting Agent and Type of Nozzle on Copper Hydroxide Deposit on Sugar Beet Leaves (Beta vulgaris L.)
    Sedlar, Aleksandar
    Gvozdenac, Sonja
    Pejovic, Momcilo
    Visacki, Vladimir
    Turan, Jan
    Tanaskovic, Snezana
    Burg, Patrik
    Vasic, Filip
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [4] Mechanical Weed Control: Sensor-Based Inter-Row Hoeing in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in the Transylvanian Depression
    Parasca, Sergiu Cioca
    Spaeth, Michael
    Rusu, Teodor
    Bogdan, Ileana
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [5] Natural Plant By-Products and Mulching Materials to Suppress Weeds and Improve Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Yield and Quality
    El-Metwally, Ibrahim M.
    Saudy, Hani S.
    Elewa, Tarek A.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2022, 22 (04) : 5217 - 5230
  • [6] Beneficial Effects of Biochar-Based Organic Fertilizers on Nitrogen Assimilation, Photosynthesis, and Sucrose Synthesis of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)
    Chen, Jingting
    Wang, Xuerui
    Liu, Xinyu
    Wang, Shufeng
    Zhao, Jianan
    Zhang, He
    Wang, Yubo
    Li, Caifeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PRODUCTION, 2022, 16 (04) : 755 - 768
  • [7] COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND CONSERVATION CULTIVATION SYSTEMS IN TERMS OF ENERGY USE AND CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSION FOR RAPESEED (BRASSICA NAPUS L.) PRODUCTION
    Mutlu, Nusret
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2020, 29 (08): : 6400 - 6411
  • [8] Soil seedbed engineering and its impact on germination and establishment in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) as affected by seed-soil contact
    Blunk, Sebastian
    de Heer, Martine I.
    Sturrock, Craig J.
    Mooney, Sacha J.
    SEED SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2018, 28 (03) : 236 - 244
  • [9] The Effect of Irrigation and Fertilization Reduction on Yield, Quality, and Resource Use Efficiency of Drip-Fertilized Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in Northern China
    Zhang, Bowen
    Chang, Yuxin
    Li, Guolong
    Zhang, Shaoying
    Zhang, Peng
    Wang, Zhenzhen
    Kong, Dejuan
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2025, 14 (04):
  • [10] Population dynamics of stubby root nematodes (Trichodorus and Paratrichodorus spp.) associated with 'Docking disorder' of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), in field rotations with cover crops in East England
    Mwangi, Nyambura G.
    Stevens, Mark
    Wright, Alistair J. D.
    Watts, William D. J.
    Edwards, Simon G.
    Hare, Martin C.
    Back, Matthew A.
    ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 2025,