EPISTEMOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTING Functionalist, interpretive, and critical approaches

被引:0
作者
Moscoso Paucarchuco, Ketty Marilu [1 ]
Gutierrez Gomez, Edgar [1 ]
Arones Cisneros, Alcides [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Huanta, Huanta, Peru
[2] Univ Catolica Trujillo, Trujillo, Peru
来源
PROMETEICA-REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA Y CIENCIAS | 2023年 / 27期
关键词
environmental accounting; epistemology; functionalist; interpretive; critical;
D O I
10.34024/prometeica.2023.27.14275
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The purpose of this research is to delimit the epistemological considerations of environmental accounting from three categories: functionalist, interpretative and critical, each with 16 subcategories. The methodology used is exploratory, qualitative, based on a documentary analysis of refereed scientific articles in the highest scientific demand (SCOPUS), under exact search filters, with systematic processing through ATLAS.ti9. The results show a greater rootedness in the critical approach, highlighting the drive for change, conflict studies, structural inequality; followed by the functionalist approach, where the interest in clarity, conceptual rigor, as well as the demonstrative pretension and the spirit of precision and certainty predominate; finally, in the interpretative approach, rationalizing practices are sought, with a comprehensive intention that drives a resolution Process
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 70
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Abe T. C., 2020, SUSTENTABILIDADE DEB, V11, P195, DOI [10.18472/SustDeb.v11n1.2020.29639, DOI 10.18472/SUSTDEB.V11N1.2020.29639]
  • [2] Trend and relationship between environmental accounting disclosure and environmental performance for mining companies listed in China
    Agyemang, Andrew Osei
    Yusheng, Kong
    Twum, Angelina Kissiwaa
    Ayamba, Emmanuel Caesar
    Kongkuah, Maxwell
    Musah, Mohammed
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 23 (08) : 12192 - 12216
  • [3] Al-Mawali H, 2021, ACCOUNTING, V7, P535, DOI [10.5267/j.ac.2021.1.005, DOI 10.5267/J.AC.2021.1.005]
  • [4] Appiah B K., 2020, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, V10, P360, DOI [DOI 10.32479/IJEEP.8697, 10.32479/ijeep.8697]
  • [5] Cabrera-Narvaez A., 2021, INNOVAR, V31, DOI [10.15446/innovar.v31n82.98428, DOI 10.15446/INNOVAR.V31N82.98428]
  • [6] Measuring environmental incomes beyond standard national and ecosystem accounting frameworks: testing and comparing the agroforestry Accounting System in a holm oak dehesa case study in Andalusia-Spain
    Campos, Pablo
    Oviedo, Jose L.
    Alvarez, Alejandro
    Ovando, Paola
    Mesa, Bruno
    Caparros, Alejandro
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 99
  • [7] Cantillo Orozco A., 2020, UTOPIA PRAXIS LATINO, V25, P201, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.3907071, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.3907071]
  • [8] Cardona Hernandez J. D., 2018, REV VIS CONTABLE, V17, P159, DOI DOI 10.24142/RVC.N17A6
  • [9] Influences of Behavioral Intention to Engage in Environmental Accounting Practices for Corporate Sustainability: Managerial Perspectives from a Developing Country
    Chen, Xiaofang
    Weerathunga, P. R.
    Nurunnabi, Mohammad
    Kulathunga, K. M. M. C. B.
    Samarathunga, W. H. M. S.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (13)
  • [10] Impact of Environmental Accounting Reporting Practices on Financial Performance: Evidence From Banking Sector of Bangladesh
    Dhar, Sajon
    Chowdhury, Mohammad Ashraful Ferdous
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASIAN BUSINESS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2021, 12 (01) : 24 - 42