Frontline Bureaucratic Attitude toward Administrative Integration: Does Organizational Configuration Matter?

被引:1
作者
Ding, Fangda [1 ]
Wen, Bo [2 ,4 ]
Shon, Jongmin [3 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Univ Newark, Newark, NJ USA
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Soongsil Univ, Seoul, South Korea
[4] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Publ & Int Affairs, Kowloon, Room 5339, Li Dak Sum Yip Yio Chin Acad Bldg, Tat, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
administrative integration; bureaucratic attitude; organizational configuration; STREET-LEVEL BUREAUCRATS; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; CIVIL-SERVICE; TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE; PUBLIC MANAGEMENT; DISCRETION; PERFORMANCE; CHINA; ACCOUNTABILITY; PROFESSIONALS;
D O I
10.1177/00953997231165995
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The attitudes of frontline bureaucrats play a crucial role in the implementation of administrative restructuring. Administrative integration is a type of administrative reform that can fundamentally change the structure of a local administrative system and may face opposition from local public bureaucracies. Successful administrative integration requires reformers to comprehensively grasp the factors that influence frontline bureaucrats' attitudes toward this unique form of administrative restructuring. This study empirically examines how organizational configurations shape bureaucratic attitudes toward administrative integration. The findings have both theoretical and practical implications for research on bureaucratic attitudes, organizational configurations, and administrative integration.
引用
收藏
页码:1255 / 1289
页数:35
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
Agranoff R., 2012, Collaborating to manage: A primer for the public sector
[2]  
Aiken L., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1969, Discretionary justice: A preliminary inquiry
[4]   REFORM WITH CHINESE CHARACTERISTICS - THE CONTEXT OF CHINESE CIVIL-SERVICE REFORM [J].
AUFRECHT, SE ;
BUN, LS .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1995, 55 (02) :175-182
[5]   A model of organizational integration, implementation effort, and performance [J].
Barki, H ;
Pinsonneault, A .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (02) :165-179
[6]   Tolerant, If Personal Goals Remain Unharmed: Explaining Supranational Bureaucrats' Attitudes to Organizational Change [J].
Bauer, Michael W. .
GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 2012, 25 (03) :485-510
[7]  
Bertelli A. M., 2021, RATIONAL CHOICE PERS
[8]   Formalization and consistency heighten organizational rule following: Experimental and survey evidence [J].
Borry, Erin L. ;
DeHart-Davis, Leisha ;
Kaufmann, Wesley ;
Merritt, Cullen C. ;
Mohr, Zachary ;
Tummers, Lars .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2018, 96 (02) :368-385
[9]  
Bouckaert G, 2010, PUB SECTOR ORGAN, P13
[10]  
Brehm John., 1999, WORKING SHIRKING SAB