Coordinated development of land multi-function space: An analytical framework for matching the supply of resources and environment with the use of land space for ecological protection, agricultural production and urban construction

被引:13
作者
Qu, Yanbo [1 ]
Zhang, Yanjun [1 ]
Wang, Shilei [1 ]
Shang, Ran [2 ]
Zong, Haining [1 ]
Zhan, Lingyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Management, Jinan 250014, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Agr & Engn Univ, Sch Resources & Environm Engn, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
land space; coordinated development; dominance; matching relationship; ecological protection; agricultural production; urban construction; Shandong province; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES CONCEPT; CARRYING-CAPACITY; POLICY; CHINA; DIFFERENTIATION; SUSTAINABILITY; CHALLENGES; PATTERN;
D O I
10.1007/s11442-023-2084-z
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Based on the carrying capacity of the resources and the environment, this article defines the connotation of the land multifunctional space (LMFS) from three aspects, ecological protection, agricultural production and urban construction, in the new era of land space planning system. Moreover, a framework is constructed for the coordinated development of the multi-functional oriented space to match the use of land space (ULS) with the supply of resources and environment (SRE). Based on this, the technology and methods of comprehensive evaluation, dominance recognition, and matching relationship division functions of the use of land space (FULS) and functions of the supply of resources and environment (FSRE) are discussed. The advantageous functions of the use of land space (AFULS) and advantageous functions of the supply of resources and environment (AFSRE) are also identified in the study area. A LMFS coordinated development system integrating "function position-comprehensive partition-regulation strategy" is proposed. Through the empirical study of Shandong province, we found that, first, the FULS of ecological protection space in the province is mainly found in high value areas, and the FSRE is mainly in low value areas, which has certain complementarity in the space. The FULS of agricultural production space is mainly observed in high value areas, the FSRE is mainly in middle value areas, and the spatial distribution is balanced and staggered. The FULS of the urban construction space and the FSRE are mainly in middle values areas, and the spatial distribution is basically similar. Second, the FULS in the study area is dominated by the single advantage of agricultural production and urban construction, while the FSRE has a relatively balanced distribution of the advantages of ecological protection, single agricultural production and compound advantages of agricultural production and urban construction, and urban construction and ecological protection. The matching between the two is mainly at high and middle levels. Specifically, 70% of the province's land space still has a certain development and utilization potential, and 30% of ULS intensity is close to or exceeds the resource and environment carrying capacity. Third, considering the comprehensive impact of resource endowment, social and economic development and policy and institutional environment on different matching relationships, this paper constructs the land spatial development strategic pattern of "two screens-seven regions-multicore" positioning and "four regions-eight categories" hierarchical area of Shandong at the macro level, and puts forward a differentiated land space development strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 339
页数:29
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Perceptions of the ecosystem services concept: Opportunities and challenges in the Swedish municipal context [J].
Beery, Thomas ;
Stalhammar, Sanna ;
Jonsson, K. Ingemar ;
Wamsler, Christine ;
Bramryd, Torleif ;
Brink, Ebba ;
Ekelund, Nils ;
Johansson, Michael ;
Palo, Thomas ;
Schubert, Per .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 17 :123-130
[2]   Geographical thoughts on the relationship between 'Beautiful China' and land spatial planning [J].
Chen Mingxing ;
Liang Longwu ;
Wang Zhenbo ;
Zhang Wenzhong ;
Yu Jianhui ;
Liang Yi .
JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 30 (05) :705-723
[3]   Progress of China's new-type urbanization construction since 2014: A preliminary assessment [J].
Chen, Mingxing ;
Liu, Weidong ;
Lu, Dadao ;
Chen, Hao ;
Ye, Chao .
CITIES, 2018, 78 :180-193
[4]   Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions [J].
Coenen, Lars ;
Benneworth, Paul ;
Truffer, Bernhard .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (06) :968-979
[5]   Impact of urbanization on cultivated land changes in China [J].
Deng, Xiangzheng ;
Huang, Jikun ;
Rozelle, Scott ;
Zhang, Jipeng ;
Li, Zhihui .
LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 45 :1-7
[6]  
[樊杰 Fan Jie], 2021, [中国土地科学, China Land Science], V35, P1
[7]  
[樊杰 Fan Jie], 2021, [城市规划学刊, Urban Planning Forum], P15
[8]  
[樊杰 Fan Jie], 2015, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V70, P186
[9]   Planning multifunctional green infrastructure for compact cities: What is the state of practice? [J].
Hansen, Rieke ;
Olafsson, Anton Stahl ;
van der Jagt, Alexander P. N. ;
Rall, Emily ;
Pauleit, Stephan .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 96 :99-110
[10]   Benefits and and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: Some stakeholder perspectives [J].
Hauck, Jennifer ;
Goerg, Christoph ;
Varjopuro, Riku ;
Ratamaki, Outi ;
Jax, Kurt .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2013, 25 :13-21