The role of teacher support in students' academic performance in low- and high-stakes assessments

被引:2
|
作者
Ansong, David [1 ]
Okumu, Moses [2 ]
Amoako, Emmanuel Owusu [1 ]
Appiah-Kubi, Jamal [1 ]
Ampomah, Abena Oforiwaa [3 ]
Koomson, Isaac [4 ]
Hamilton, Eric [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Champaign, IL USA
[3] Univ Ghana, Accra, Ghana
[4] Univ Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
[5] Pepperdine Univ, Malibu, CA USA
关键词
Teacher support; Low-stakes assessment; High-stakes assessment; Student behavior; Academic performance; SOCIAL SUPPORT; ACHIEVEMENT; ENGAGEMENT; HOMEWORK; SUCCESS; RATINGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102396
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Teachers' impact on learning outcomes is well supported, but more robust evidence is needed on the complex indirect pathways through which teacher support impacts performance in low-versus high-stakes examinations. This study sought to understand the divergent mechanisms through which teachers' support for students affects their performance on low- and high-stakes assessments. Bayesian structural equation modeling with the Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm and data from Ghana were used to test mediated, unmediated, and moderatedmediated relationships. The results show that a typical student's high-stakes exam performance increases by approximately 13 % for each one-unit increase in teacher support. A chain mediation effect also exists through student homework behavior and low-stakes everyday performance. Student gender is also a moderator. These results could aid in identifying the malleable leverage points associated with low- and high-stakes assessments. Such empirical clarity would help education administrators to develop appropriate professional development programs that enhance teachers' support roles, enabling them to respond better to learning disparities and related challenges.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Chinese school teachers' conceptions of high-stakes and low-stakes assessments: an invariance analysis
    Chen, Junjun
    Teo, Timothy
    EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 2020, 46 (04) : 458 - 475
  • [2] Comparing badges and learning goals in low- and high-stakes learning contexts
    Morris, Bradley J.
    Dragovich, Colleen
    Todaro, Rachael
    Balci, Sebiha
    Dalton, Eve
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 31 (03) : 573 - 603
  • [3] The Measurement Invariance of the Student Opinion Scale across English and Non-English Language Learner Students within the Context of Low- and High-Stakes Assessments
    Immekus, Jason C.
    McGee, Dean
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [4] Effort in Low-Stakes Assessments: What Does It Take to Perform as Well as in a High-Stakes Setting?
    Attali, Yigal
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2016, 76 (06) : 1045 - 1058
  • [5] Comparing Student Performance on Low-Stakes and High-Stakes Evaluations of Conceptual Understanding
    Vitali, Rachel V.
    Perkins, Noel C.
    Finelli, Cynthia J.
    2018 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2018,
  • [6] The Role of Teacher Autonomy Support on Students' Academic Engagement and Resilience
    Ma, Qiangqiang
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [7] Influence Mechanism of Teacher Support and Parent Support on the Academic Achievement of Secondary Vocational Students
    Peng, Xianjie
    Sun, Xiaonan
    He, Zhen
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [8] Academic Resilience and Engagement in High School Students: The Mediating Role of Perceived Teacher Emotional Support
    Romano, Luciano
    Angelini, Giacomo
    Consiglio, Piermarco
    Fiorilli, Caterina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATION IN HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION, 2021, 11 (02) : 334 - 344
  • [9] Internet use at and outside of school in relation to low- and high-stakes mathematics test scores across 3 years
    Rozgonjuk, Dmitri
    Taht, Karin
    Vassil, Kristjan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEM EDUCATION, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [10] Consequences of high-stakes assessment for students with and without disabilities
    Christenson, Sandra L.
    Decker, Dawn M.
    Triezenberg, Heidi L.
    Ysseldyke, James E.
    Reschly, Amy
    EDUCATIONAL POLICY, 2007, 21 (04) : 662 - 690