Ellipsotopes: Uniting Ellipsoids and Zonotopes for Reachability Analysis and Fault Detection

被引:24
作者
Kousik, Shreyas [1 ]
Dai, Adam [2 ]
Gao, Grace Xingxin [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Aeronaut & Astronaut, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Ellipsoids; Fault detection; Reachability analysis; Generators; Collision avoidance; Uncertainty; Task analysis; reachability analysis; set representations;
D O I
10.1109/TAC.2022.3191750
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Ellipsoids are a common representation for reachability analysis, because they can be transformed efficiently under affine maps, and they allow conservative approximation of Minkowski sums, which let one incorporate uncertainty and linearization error in a dynamical system by expanding the size of the reachable set. Zonotopes, a type of symmetric, convex polytope, are similarly frequently used, because they allow efficient numerical implementations of affine maps and exact Minkowski sums. Both of these representations also enable efficient, convex collision detection for fault detection or formal verification tasks, wherein one checks if the reachable set of a system collides (i.e., intersects) with an unsafe set. However, both representations often result in conservative representations for reachable sets of arbitrary systems, and neither is closed under intersection. Recently, representations, such as constrained zonotopes and constrained polynomial zonotopes, have been shown to overcome some of these conservativeness challenges, and are closed under intersection. However, constrained zonotopes cannot represent shapes with smooth boundaries, such as ellipsoids, and constrained polynomial zonotopes can require solving a nonconvex program for collision checking or fault detection. This article introduces ellipsotopes, a set representation that is closed under affine maps, Minkowski sums, and intersections. Ellipsotopes combine the advantages of ellipsoids and zonotopes while ensuring convex collision checking. The utility of this representation is demonstrated on several examples.
引用
收藏
页码:3440 / 3452
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   A critical fault detection analysis & fault time in a UPFC transmission line [J].
S. K. Mishra ;
L. N. Tripathy .
Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems, 2019, 4
[22]   Fault Detection Based on Multivariate Trajectory Analysis [J].
Shen F. ;
Song Z. ;
Ge Z. .
Hsi-An Chiao Tung Ta Hsueh/Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2017, 51 (03) :122-128
[23]   Fault Detection for Enclosed Board with Autocorrelation Analysis [J].
Zhang Dapeng ;
Zhang Xiangkai ;
Qu Bo ;
Fang Hongwei .
2022 34TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, CCDC, 2022, :804-808
[24]   Fault detection for motor based on cepstrum analysis [J].
Zhang, Xiong-Xi ;
Liu, Zhen-Xing .
Dianli Xitong Baohu yu Kongzhi/Power System Protection and Control, 2010, 38 (20) :145-147
[25]   Enhancing Fault Detection with Clustering and Covariance Analysis [J].
Gallup, Ethan ;
Quah, Titus ;
Machalek, Derek ;
Powell, Kody M. .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (02) :258-263
[26]   A study of fault detection in a pump by signal analysis [J].
Hanakuma, Y ;
Yamamoto, J .
KAGAKU KOGAKU RONBUNSHU, 1999, 25 (06) :1033-1036
[27]   Digital analysis of aeromagnetic maps: Detection of a fault [J].
Naidu, PS ;
Mathew, MP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1998, 38 (03) :169-179
[28]   Cyclostationary analysis for fault detection in PV inverters [J].
Telidjane, Mohammed ;
Bakhti, Benaoumeur .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2025, 291
[29]   Fault Detection Analysis of Boolean Control Networks [J].
Fornasini, Ettore ;
Valcher, Maria Elena .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2015, 60 (10) :2734-2739
[30]   Fault Detection of the Camellia Cipher against Single Byte Differential Fault Analysis [J].
Li, Wei ;
Xia, Xiaoling ;
Wang, Yi .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS & INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2012, 6 (03) :951-957