Technoeconomic analysis of small modular reactors decarbonizing industrial process heat

被引:6
作者
Vanatta, Max [1 ]
Patel, Deep [2 ]
Allen, Todd [2 ]
Cooper, Daniel [3 ]
Craig, Michael T. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, 440 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Nucl Engn & Radiol Sci, 2355 Bonisteel Blvd, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Mech Engn Hayward, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Ind & Operat Engn, 1205 Beal Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
co-generation; energy systems; industrial decarbonization; next generation nuclear; optimization; process heat; small modular reactors; technoeconomic analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.joule.2023.03.009
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Providing high-temperature industrial heat is a key decarbonization challenge. Nuclear small modular reactors (SMRs) could meet this decarbonization challenge, but no technoeconomic analyses of their potential exist. We quantify the technoeconomic potential of five SMR types for displacing natural gas providing process heat for 357 industrial facility processes across five US states. At 2021 US gas prices, we find no SMRs are economically viable when providing process heat alone. 28 SMR modules (5.6 GWth) and 256 modules (28.6 GWth) are economically viable at avoided gas costs of $8 and $16/MMBtu, respectively. By also participating in wholesale power markets, we find up to 113 industrial facility processes (6% of indus-trial demand) could be economically served by 33.9 GWth of SMRs, avoiding 4 million tons of CO2 emissions annually at 2021 US gas prices. Our analysis identifies key criteria that drive SMR economic viability, including thermal demand quantity and quality matching.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 737
页数:26
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, Technical report
  • [2] Barnett H., 1991, IAEA B
  • [3] Boldon L., 2014, Small Modular Reactor: First-of-a-Kind (FOAK) and Nth-of-a-Kind (NOAK) Economic Analysis
  • [4] Budi R. F. S., 2019, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, V536, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/536/1/012144
  • [5] Butcher N., 2018, EC FINANCE WORKING G
  • [6] Carelli MD, 2008, ICONE 16: PROCEEDING OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING - 2008, VOL 4, P499
  • [7] Cox J., 2020, FLEXIBLE NUCL ENERGY
  • [8] Day-ahead unit commitment model for microgrids
    Deckmyn, Christof
    Van de Vyver, Jan
    Vandoorn, Tine L.
    Meersman, Bart
    Desmet, Jan
    Vandevelde, Lieven
    [J]. IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2017, 11 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [9] EPA, 2020, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990-2018
  • [10] EPA, 2022, CLEAN AIR MARK PROGR