Alternatives to conventional antibiotics for the prevention and treatment of commonly occurring diseases in feedlot cattle

被引:2
作者
Cusack, Pmv [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Livestock Prod Serv, Cowra, NSW 2794, Australia
[2] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Agr Environm & Vet Sci, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia
关键词
antimicrobial resistance; feedlot medicine; large animal medicine; ruminant nutrition; BOVINE RESPIRATORY-DISEASE; ESCHERICHIA-COLI O157-H7; OXIDE-RELEASING SOLUTION; DIRECT-FED MICROBIALS; IN-VITRO; NITRIC-OXIDE; HIGH-RISK; RUMINAL FERMENTATION; IMMUNE-RESPONSE; ESSENTIAL OILS;
D O I
10.1111/avj.13314
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Antibiotic-resistant bacteria are a problem in human medicine. The development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria in feedlot cattle could have negative effects on their health and welfare and there is a theoretical possibility of transmission of antibiotic-resistant bacteria from food animals to humans. Alternatives to conventional antibiotics in feedlot health management could reduce the selective pressure for the development of antibiotic resistance. This review assesses the evidence supporting potential alternatives to conventional antibiotics in the prevention and treatment of diseases in feedlot cattle, including nitric oxide, plant extracts, supplemental yeast or yeast products, bacterial probiotics, organic acids, bacteriophages and non-specific immunostimulants. Further research is warranted with lactate utilising bacteria, the organic acid malate, bacteriophages and the non-specific immunostimulants beta-1,3 glucan and those based on pox viruses. However, none of the alternatives to conventional antibiotics investigated in this review have sufficient supporting evidence to date to justify their use with feedlot cattle. Frequently, statistically weak results and studies without negative controls are cited as support for similar studies. The health and welfare of feedlot cattle are dependent on the use of products that have robust supporting data to ensure efficacy and to avoid adverse outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 241
页数:13
相关论文
共 138 条
[1]  
Abedon Stephen T, 2011, Bacteriophage, V1, P66
[2]  
Adu F., 2019, African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, V13, P57, DOI [10.5897/ajpp2019.4989, 10.5897/ajpp2019.4989]
[3]   Immunological complex for enhancement of innate immune response in passive vaccination [J].
Aizenshtein, Elina ;
Pinchasov, Yosef ;
Morag, Ely ;
Leitner, Gabriel ;
Shpanir, Yossi ;
Reimond, Dorit ;
Pitcovski, Jacob .
VACCINE, 2013, 31 (04) :626-631
[4]  
[Anonymous], CHR HANSEN INTERNAL
[5]   Influence of feeding the probiotic PIONEER PDFM® to growing lambs on performances and blood composition [J].
Antunovic, Z ;
Speranda, M ;
Liker, B ;
Seric, V ;
Sencic, D ;
Domacinovic, M ;
Speranda, T .
ACTA VETERINARIA-BEOGRAD, 2005, 55 (04) :287-300
[6]  
ARCHAMBAULT D, 1989, CORNELL VET, V79, P11
[7]  
AUS-MEAT Ltd, 2021, NATL FEEDLOT ACCREDI
[8]   Efficiency-corrected PCR quantification for identification of prevalence and load of respiratory disease-causing agents in feedlot cattle [J].
Barnewall, R. J. ;
Marsh, I. B. ;
Williams, T. M. ;
Cusack, P. M., V ;
Sales, N. ;
Galea, F. ;
Szentirmay, A. N. ;
Quinn, J. C. .
AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2022, 100 (11) :539-549
[9]   Systematic review and meta-analysis of probiotic use on inflammatory biomarkers and disease prevention in cattle [J].
Barreto, Michelle O. ;
Soust, Martin ;
Moore, Robert J. ;
Olchowy, Timothy W. J. ;
Alawneh, John I. .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2021, 194
[10]  
Behrmann K., 1995, PROPHYLACTIC METAPHY