Linguistic Multiple-Attribute Decision Making Based on Regret Theory and Minimax-DEA

被引:0
作者
Hu, Jinyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Pittsburgh Inst, Chengdu 610207, Peoples R China
关键词
regret theory; data envelopment analysis; minimax reference point approach; multiple-attribute decision making; INFORMATION; SELECTION; CHOICE; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.3390/math11204259
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Given that most current linguistic multiattribute decision-making methods do not consider the optimal efficiency of decision-making units and the psychological behavior of decision makers, a linguistic multiattribute decision-making method based on regret theory, data envelopment analysis, and the minimax reference point method is proposed. First, based on the decision-maker psychology of regret and avoidance, the perceived utility value of each decision-making unit was calculated using the language regret-joy value function. The subjective and optimal efficiency values of each decision-making unit were obtained using the subjective weighting and data envelopment analysis methods, respectively. Next, we considered the best efficiency as the reference point and the subjective efficiency as the decision preference to establish a minimax reference point model. By solving the model, a set of public weights that minimizes the difference between the efficiency values of all decision-making units and their optimal efficiency values can be obtained to sort the decision-making units and select the best. The feasibility of the method was verified using an example of employee evaluation and selection; the effectiveness of the method was demonstrated through comparative analysis with other methods.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Adolphson D., 1991, A United Frame Work for Classifying DEA Models
  • [2] Weights and importance in composite indicators: Closing the gap
    Becker, William
    Saisana, Michaela
    Paruolo, Paolo
    Vandecasteele, Ine
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 80 : 12 - 22
  • [3] REGRET IN DECISION-MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY
    BELL, DE
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1982, 30 (05) : 961 - 981
  • [4] Improving the practical application of the Delphi method in group-based judgment: A six-step prescription for a well-founded and defensible process
    Belton, Ian
    MacDonald, Alice
    Wright, George
    Hamlin, Iain
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 147 : 72 - 82
  • [5] A Quantitative Measurement of Regret Theory
    Bleichrodt, Han
    Cillo, Alessandra
    Diecidue, Enrico
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2010, 56 (01) : 161 - 175
  • [6] MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS
    CHARNES, A
    COOPER, WW
    RHODES, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) : 429 - 444
  • [7] Multi-attribute decision-making method based on a novel distance measure of linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy sets
    Cheng, Yali
    Li, Yonghong
    Yang, Jie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2021, 40 (01) : 1147 - 1160
  • [8] Correa Machado A.M., 2023, Qual. Quant, V57, P4387, DOI [10.1007/s11135-022-01546-y, DOI 10.1007/S11135-022-01546-Y]
  • [9] Beyond principal component analysis (PCA) of product means: Toward a psychometric view on sensory profiling data
    Dettmar, Burkhard
    Peltier, Caroline
    Schlich, Pascal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES, 2020, 35 (02)
  • [10] Application of entropy-based multi-attribute decision-making method to structured selection of settlement
    Duo Tianlin
    Guo Jianzhong
    Wu Fang
    Zhai Renjian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION AND IMAGE REPRESENTATION, 2019, 58 : 220 - 232