The incidence of physeal fractures in the lower limb and the frequency of premature physeal closure: a cohort study of 236 patients

被引:5
作者
Cant, David A. L. W. [1 ,2 ]
Faergemann, Christian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Sect Pediat Orthopaed, Odense, Denmark
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Res, Orthopaed Res Unit, Odense, Denmark
关键词
DISTAL TIBIA; LENGTH DISCREPANCY; INJURIES; ARREST;
D O I
10.2340/17453674.2023.13429
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and purpose - Physeal fractures represent 15-20% of all pediatric fractures and may lead to premature physeal closure (PPC). The aim of our study was to deter-mine the incidence rates of physeal fractures in the lower limb and the proportion of PPC that lead to limb length dis-crepancy (LLD), and/or angular deformity (AD). Patients and methods - This retrospective study included 236 consecutive children with physeal fracture in the tibia, distal femur, or distal fibula. We estimated inci-dence rates and reviewed medical records and radiographs to obtain information regarding the development of PPC lead-ing to LLD and AD. Of the 236 children, 100 had planned growth control or were referred for growth control due to symptoms of PPC. Results - The total incidence rate was 35 (95% CI 30-39) per 100,000 person-years, with 1.2 (CI 0.5-23) for distal femur, 5.7 (CI 3.1-7.8) for proximal tibia, 14 (CI 11-17) for distal tibia, and 14 (CI 11-17) for distal fibula. The overall prevalence of PPC was 9.7% (CI 6.3-14), while the prevalence was 38% (CI 8.5-76) for distal femur, 15% (CI 5.9-31) for proximal tibia, 14% (CI 7.4--22) for distal tibia, and 1.1% (CI 0.3--59) for distal fibula. We found a significant higher hazard of PPC in fractures with & GE; 3 mm displacement (hazard ratio: 12, CI 1.5-97). Conclusion - 10% of children with physeal fractures developed PPC that led to LLD or AD. The highest hazard ratio was in children who had an initial fracture displace-ment. This study highlights the importance of routine and uniform growth evaluation after a physeal fracture.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 294
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Predicting the outcome of physeal fractures of the distal femur [J].
Arkader, Alexandre ;
Warner, William C., Jr. ;
Horn, B. David ;
Shaw, Rupali N. ;
Wells, Lawrence .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2007, 27 (06) :703-708
[2]   Open versus closed treatment of distal tibia physeal fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Asad W.A. ;
Younis M.H.S. ;
Ahmed A.F. ;
Ibrahim T. .
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2018, 28 (3) :503-509
[3]   Premature physeal closure following distal tibia physeal fractures - A new radiographic predictor [J].
Barmada, A ;
Gaynor, T ;
Mubarak, SJ .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2003, 23 (06) :733-739
[4]   Outcome of distal tibia physeal fractures: a review of cases as related to risk factors [J].
D'Angelo, Fabio ;
Solarino, Giuseppe ;
Tanas, Davide ;
Zani, Alessia ;
Cherubino, Paolo ;
Moretti, Biagio .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2017, 48 :S7-S11
[5]   Traumatic injuries of the distal femoral physis. Retrospective study on 151 cases [J].
Eid, AM ;
Hafez, MA .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2002, 33 (03) :251-255
[6]  
Flynn JM, 2019, Rockwood and Wilkins: Fractures in Children, V9th
[7]   Growth disturbances after injuries of the proximal tibial epiphysis [J].
Gautier, E ;
Ziran, BH ;
Egger, B ;
Slongo, T ;
Jakob, RP .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 1998, 118 (1-2) :37-41
[8]  
Goel A, 1997, Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), V26, P852
[9]   Leg Length Discrepancy: The Natural History (And What Do We Really Know) [J].
Gordon, J. Eric ;
Davis, Lauren E. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 39 (06) :S10-S13
[10]   Growth arrest and its risk factors after physeal fracture of the distal tibia in children and adolescents [J].
Jung, Hyon Soo ;
Park, Moon Seok ;
Lee, Kyoung Min ;
Choi, Kug Jin ;
Choi, Woo Young ;
Sung, Ki Hyuk .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2021, 52 (04) :844-848