Clinical Outcomes of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance Without Detectable Clones

被引:1
|
作者
Terashita, Maho [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Selamet, Umut [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Midha, Shonali [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Nadeem, Omar [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Laubach, Jacob [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Rennke, Helmut G. [2 ,6 ]
Murakami, Naoka [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Renal Div, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[3] St Marianna Univ, Div Nephrol & Hypertens, Sch Med, Kanagawa, Japan
[4] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Boston, MA USA
[5] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[6] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Pathol Dept, Boston, MA USA
[7] 221 Longwood Ave,EBRC 305, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL REPORTS | 2023年 / 8卷 / 12期
关键词
kidney biopsy; monoclonal gammopathy with renal significance; monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease; plasma cell dyscrasia; proteinuria; onconephrology; PROLIFERATIVE GLOMERULONEPHRITIS; IMMUNOTACTOID GLOMERULOPATHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ekir.2023.09.022
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) is characterized by monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition in kidneys. However, monoclonal immunoglobulin and responsible clone(s) are not always detectable. Treatment response and kidney outcome of MGRS without detectable clones remain unclear.Methods: In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, we identified MGRS without detectable clones from our biopsy repository between 2010 and 2022. We investigated the correlations between treatment regimens and kidney outcomes defined by proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and the impact of repeat kidney biopsy.Results: Our study cohort included 29 cases (27 native kidney and 2 transplant allograft biopsies) of MGRS without detectable clones. At diagnosis, median serum creatinine was 1.8 mg/dl (interquartile range [IQR] 1.3-2.7), with proteinuria 4.6 g/gCr (IQR 2.3-7.9). Treatment regimens were variable: 6 (21%) received conservative therapy, 13 (45%) received plasma cell clone-directed therapy, 8 (28%) received lymphocytic clone-directed therapy, and 2 (7%) received nonclone-directed immunosuppressive therapy. Of 24 patients with proteinuria >0.5 g/gCr at diagnosis, 9 (38%) and 6 (25%) achieved complete response (CR) and partial response (PR), respectively. If interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) was >50% at the initial biopsy, less proportion of patients achieved CR. Six of 7 repeat biopsies showed progression of chronic changes (e.g., IFTA) but provided limited information on treatment response. Conclusion: Treatment regimens and outcomes of MGRS without detectable clones were extremely variable. Repeat biopsy provided limited information to assess disease activity or the need for additional treatment. More sensitive tools are needed to detect clones and to assess treatment response.
引用
收藏
页码:2765 / 2777
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Uncertainty Puzzle of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance Without Detectable Clones
    Shah, Chintan, V
    Leung, Nelson
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL REPORTS, 2023, 8 (12): : 2511 - 2514
  • [2] Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance A short clinical approach
    Reiter, Thomas
    Nackenhorst, Maja
    MEMO-MAGAZINE OF EUROPEAN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 14 (01) : 98 - 102
  • [3] Pathophysiology and management of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance
    Jain, Ankur
    Haynes, Richard
    Kothari, Jaimal
    Khera, Akhil
    Soares, Maria
    Ramasamy, Karthik
    BLOOD ADVANCES, 2019, 3 (15) : 2409 - 2423
  • [4] Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS): retrospective monocentric analysis of clinical outcomes and treatment strategies
    Pasquale Esposito
    Lucia Macciò
    Antonia Cagnetta
    Francesca Costigliolo
    Emilio Venturelli
    Elisa Russo
    Marco Gallo
    Debora Soncini
    Francesca Viazzi
    Roberto Massimo Lemoli
    Michele Cea
    Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 25 (1)
  • [5] A Case of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance
    Hogan, Jonathan J.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 13 (06): : 937 - 939
  • [6] Diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance
    Bridoux, Frank
    Leung, Nelson
    Hutchison, Colin A.
    Touchard, Guy
    Sethi, Sanjeev
    Fermand, Jean-Paul
    Picken, Maria M.
    Herrera, Guillermo A.
    Kastritis, Efstathios
    Merlini, Giampaolo
    Roussel, Murielle
    Fervenza, Fernando C.
    Dispenzieri, Angela
    Kyle, Robert A.
    Nasr, Samih H.
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 87 (04) : 698 - 711
  • [7] Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: clinical manifestation, pathogenic characteristic and treatment
    Cao, Qin
    Qi, Huimeng
    Yao, Li
    Liu, Qiang
    PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2020, 62 (01) : 38 - 53
  • [8] An update to the pathogenesis for monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance
    Zuo, Chao
    Zhu, Yuge
    Xu, Gaosi
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2020, 149
  • [9] An update to the pathogenesis for monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance
    Zuo, Chao
    Zhu, Yuge
    Xu, Gaosi
    ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 2020, 99 (04) : 703 - 714
  • [10] Bortezomib Maintenance for the Treatment of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance
    Lee, Holly
    Duggan, Peter
    Neri, Paola
    Tay, Jason
    Jimenez-Zepeda, Victor H.
    MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 11