Price volatility of revenue managed goods: Implications for demand and price elasticity

被引:3
作者
Morlotti, Chiara [1 ]
Mantin, Benny [2 ]
Malighetti, Paolo [1 ]
Redondi, Renato [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergamo, Dept Management Informat & Prod Engn, Via Pasubio 7B, Dalmine, Italy
[2] Univ Luxembourg, Fac Law Econ & Finance FDEF, Luxembourg Ctr Logist & Supply Chain Management LC, 6 Rue Richard Coudenhove Kalergi, L-1359 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
关键词
Revenue management; Dynamic pricing; Price elasticity; Price volatility; Lab experiment; AIR-TRAVEL; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; STRATEGIES; EXPECTATIONS; CONSUMERS; AIRLINES; DYNAMICS; CUSTOMER; LEISURE; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2023.07.018
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Revenue management practices are widely employed in various sectors. These mechanisms dynamically adjust prices observed by consumers typically through the control of price classes and their availabil-ity. As such, these pricing environments tend to exhibit some predictable behaviors as the product ap-proaches the expiration or consumption date but may also result in varying degrees of price volatility. Such price paths may ultimately alter consumer behavior, e.g., via delayed purchase timing (i.e., strate-gic behavior) or different willingness to pay. Accordingly, we assess consumers' responses to the real-ized price changes induced by revenue management mechanisms, using fare and sales data from aviation markets. Our empirical analyses reveal that price elasticity decreases (in absolute terms) in the degree of price volatility, whereas the realized demand is lower when price volatility is higher. This suggests that as prices become more volatile, consumers become more oblivious to these price fluctuations and may end up paying more for the products-thereby confirming and generalizing a behavior previously documented for consumer packaged goods (CPGs), which follow dramatically different pricing regimes. While this may suggest support for higher and more volatile prices, we find that given the higher prices, the overall demand decreases, highlighting a delicate trade-off firms face. To distill the insights from the empirical analyses, we formulate two hypotheses, which we test in a laboratory setting by means of an ad hoc experiment. (c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1058
页数:20
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Price elasticity estimation for deep learning-based choice models: an application to air itinerary choices [J].
Acuna-Agost, Rodrigo ;
Thomas, Eoin ;
Lheritier, Alix .
JOURNAL OF REVENUE AND PRICING MANAGEMENT, 2021, 20 (03) :213-226
[2]   Becoming Strategic: Endogenous Consumer Time Preferences and Multiperiod Pricing [J].
Aflaki, Arian ;
Feldman, Pnina ;
Swinney, Robert .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2020, 68 (04) :1116-1131
[3]  
Alderighi M., 2018, Working Paper, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3085585, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3085585]
[4]  
Anderson C.K., 2004, Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, V2, P353, DOI DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.RPM.5170083
[5]   Behavioral Anomalies in Consumer Wait-or-Buy Decisions and Their Implications for Markdown Management [J].
Baucells, Manel ;
Osadchiy, Nikolay ;
Ovchinnikov, Anton .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2017, 65 (02) :357-378
[6]   Revenue management and e-commerce [J].
Boyd, EA ;
Bilegan, IC .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (10) :1363-1386
[7]   Price elasticities of demand for passenger air travel: a meta-analysis [J].
Brons, M ;
Pels, E ;
Nijkamp, P ;
Rietveld, P .
JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2002, 8 (03) :165-175
[8]   Purchasing, Pricing, and Quick Response in the Presence of Strategic Consumers [J].
Cachon, Gerard P. ;
Swinney, Robert .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 55 (03) :497-511
[9]   oTree-An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments [J].
Chen, Daniel L. ;
Schonger, Martin ;
Wickens, Chris .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2016, 9 :88-97
[10]   Recent Developments in Dynamic Pricing Research: Multiple Products, Competition, and Limited Demand Information [J].
Chen, Ming ;
Chen, Zhi-Long .
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2015, 24 (05) :704-731