Digital economy and inclusive green growth: The moderating effect of government environmental regulation

被引:6
作者
Xie, Zuomiao [1 ]
Ma, Jinjin [1 ]
Huang, Simin [2 ]
Zhu, Jinjing [3 ]
机构
[1] Minzu Univ China, Sch Management, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Inner Mongolia Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hohhot 010021, Peoples R China
[3] St Bonaventure Univ, Sch Business, Dept Management, New York, NY 14778 USA
关键词
Digital economy; Inclusive green growth; Government environmental regulation; Spatial Durbin Model; Moderating effect; Spatial heterogeneity; INNOVATION; ENERGY; TRANSITION; EMPLOYMENT; CHINA; PATH;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-29934-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As digital economy flourishes, there have been fundamental changes in the patterns of economic development, social structure, and ecological environment, which are the key elements of inclusive green growth (IGG). However, whether digital economy can effectively contribute to IGG requires further investigation. This paper evaluates the direct and spatial spillover effect of digital economy on IGG of 280 cities in China during 2011-2019 using Spatial Durbin Model (SDM). It further explores how government environmental regulation (GER) moderates this facilitating effect. The empirical results show that digital economy significantly reinforces IGG while GER weakens the benefits of digital economy to IGG. There is a significant spatial spillover effect of digital economy on IGG in neighboring regions; specifically, IGG in peripheral cities is more significantly encouraged by digital economy than in central cities. In addition, digital development demonstrates the most significant impact on IGG in central regions of China, followed by the eastern regions, with western regions lagging behind. This paper contributes theoretically and empirically to promote digital economy selectively for IGG in different regions and provides a guideline for policymakers to achieve IGG through proper GER.
引用
收藏
页码:107938 / 107955
页数:18
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Drivers that motivate energy companies to be responsible. A systematic literature review of Corporate Social Responsibility in the energy sector [J].
Agudelo, Mauricio Andres Latapi ;
Johannsdottir, Lara ;
Davidsdottir, Brynhildur .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 247 (247)
[2]   Business Incubators and Entrepreneurial Training: Leveraging Technological Innovations and Digital Marketing [J].
Almansour, Mohammed .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 71 :13586-13597
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Towards Green Growth. OECD Green Growth Studies, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264111318-EN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Measuring Progress Towards an Inclusive Green Economy
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Inclusive Green Growth: The Pathway to Sustainable Development, DOI DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-9551-6
[6]  
Asian Development Bank, 2018, INCLUSIVE GREEN GROW, DOI [DOI 10.22617/TCS189570-2, 10.22617/TCS189570-2]
[7]   Inclusive development in environmental sustainability in sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from governance mechanisms [J].
Asongu, Simplice A. ;
Odhiambo, Nicholas M. .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 27 (04) :713-724
[8]   The Comparative Economics of ICT, Environmental Degradation and Inclusive Human Development in Sub-Saharan Africa [J].
Asongu, Simplice A. ;
Nwachukwu, Jacinta C. ;
Pyke, Chris .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2019, 143 (03) :1271-1297
[9]   The role of governance in mobile phones for inclusive human development in Sub-Saharan Africa [J].
Asongu, Simplice A. ;
Nwachukwu, Jacinta C. .
TECHNOVATION, 2016, 55-56 :1-13
[10]   Government subsidies and firm-level renewable energy investment: New evidence from partially linear functional-coefficient models [J].
Bai, Rui ;
Lin, Boqiang ;
Liu, Xiying .
ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 159