A new simplified parameterization of secondary organic aerosol in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2; CAM6.3)

被引:3
作者
Jo, Duseong S. [1 ]
Tilmes, Simone [1 ]
Emmons, Louisa K. [1 ]
Wang, Siyuan [2 ,3 ]
Vitt, Francis [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO USA
[3] NOAA, Chem Sci Lab, Boulder, CO USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
VOLATILITY BASIS-SET; GLOBAL CHEMISTRY; CLIMATE MODELS; IEPOX-SOA; REPRESENTATION; SEMIVOLATILE; EMISSIONS; IMPACT; SENSITIVITY; RETHINKING;
D O I
10.5194/gmd-16-3893-2023
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The Community Earth System Model (CESM) community has been providing versatile modeling options, with simple to complex chemistry and aerosol schemes in a single model, in order to support the broad scientific community with various research interests. While different model configurations are available in CESM and these can be used for different fields of Earth system science, simulation results that are consistent across configurations are still desirable. Here we develop a new simple secondary organic aerosol (SOA) scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) version 6.3, the atmospheric component of the CESM. The main purpose of this simplified SOA scheme is to reduce the differences in aerosol concentrations and radiative fluxes between CAM and CAM with detailed chemistry (CAM-chem) while maintaining the computational efficiency of CAM. CAM simulation results using the default CAM6 and the new SOA schemes are compared to CAM-chem results as a reference. More consistent SOA concentrations are obtained globally when using the new SOA scheme for both temporal and spatial variabilities. The new SOA scheme shows that 62% of grid cells globally are within a factor of 2 compared to the CAM-chem SOA concentrations, which is improved from 24% when using the default CAM6 SOA scheme. Furthermore, other carbonaceous aerosols (black carbon and primary organic aerosol) in CAM6 become closer to CAM-chem results due to more similar microphysical aging timescales influenced by SOA coating, which in turn leads to comparable wet deposition fluxes. This results in an improved global atmospheric burden and concentrations at the high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere compared to the full chemistry version (CAM-chem). As a consequence, the radiative flux differences between CAM-chem and CAM in the Arctic region (up to 6Wm(-2)) are significantly reduced for both nudged and free-running simulations. We find that the CAM6 SOA scheme can still be used for radiative forcing calculation as the high biases exist both in pre-industrial and present conditions, but studies focusing on the instantaneous radiative effects would benefit from using the SOA scheme developed in this study. The new SOA scheme also has technical advantages including the use of identical SOA precursor emissions as CAM-chem from the online biogenic emissions instead of pre-calculated emissions that may introduce differences. Future parameter updates to the CAMchem SOA scheme can be easily translated to the new CAM SOA scheme as it is derived from the CAM-chem SOA scheme.
引用
收藏
页码:3893 / 3906
页数:14
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2)
    Danabasoglu, G.
    Lamarque, J. -F.
    Bacmeister, J.
    Bailey, D. A.
    DuVivier, A. K.
    Edwards, J.
    Emmons, L. K.
    Fasullo, J.
    Garcia, R.
    Gettelman, A.
    Hannay, C.
    Holland, M. M.
    Large, W. G.
    Lauritzen, P. H.
    Lawrence, D. M.
    Lenaerts, J. T. M.
    Lindsay, K.
    Lipscomb, W. H.
    Mills, M. J.
    Neale, R.
    Oleson, K. W.
    Otto-Bliesner, B.
    Phillips, A. S.
    Sacks, W.
    Tilmes, S.
    Van Kampenhout, L.
    Vertenstein, M.
    Bertini, A.
    Dennis, J.
    Deser, C.
    Fischer, C.
    Fox-Kemper, B.
    Kay, J. E.
    Kinnison, D.
    Kushner, P. J.
    Larson, V. E.
    Long, M. C.
    Mickelson, S.
    Moore, J. K.
    Nienhouse, E.
    Polvani, L.
    Rasch, P. J.
    Strand, W. G.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [2] High Climate Sensitivity in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2)
    Gettelman, A.
    Hannay, C.
    Bacmeister, J. T.
    Neale, R. B.
    Pendergrass, A. G.
    Danabasoglu, G.
    Lamarque, J-F
    Fasullo, J. T.
    Bailey, D. A.
    Lawrence, D. M.
    Mills, M. J.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 46 (14) : 8329 - 8337
  • [3] The Chemistry Mechanism in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2)
    Emmons, Louisa K.
    Schwantes, Rebecca H.
    Orlando, John J.
    Tyndall, Geoff
    Kinnison, Douglas
    Lamarque, Jean-Francois
    Marsh, Daniel
    Mills, Michael J.
    Tilmes, Simone
    Bardeen, Charles
    Buchholz, Rebecca R.
    Conley, Andrew
    Gettelman, Andrew
    Garcia, Rolando
    Simpson, Isobel
    Blake, Donald R.
    Meinardi, Simone
    Petron, Gabrielle
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [4] Climate Forcing and Trends of Organic Aerosols in the Community Earth System Model (CESM2)
    Tilmes, S.
    Hodzic, A.
    Emmons, L. K.
    Mills, M. J.
    Gettelman, A.
    Kinnison, D. E.
    Park, M.
    Lamarque, J. -F.
    Vitt, F.
    Shrivastava, M.
    Campuzano-Jost, P.
    Jimenez, J. L.
    Liu, X.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2019, 11 (12) : 4323 - 4351
  • [5] Intercomparison of GEOS-Chem and CAM-chem tropospheric oxidant chemistry within the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2)
    Lin, Haipeng
    Emmons, Louisa K.
    Lundgren, Elizabeth W.
    Yang, Laura Hyesung
    Feng, Xu
    Dang, Ruijun
    Zhai, Shixian
    Tang, Yunxiao
    Kelp, Makoto M.
    Colombi, Nadia K.
    Eastham, Sebastian D.
    Fritz, Thibaud M.
    Jacob, Daniel J.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2024, 24 (15) : 8607 - 8624
  • [6] Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2)
    Chylek, Petr
    Folland, Chris
    Klett, James D.
    Lesins, Glen
    Dubey, Manvendra K.
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (05)
  • [7] Improvements in Wintertime Surface Temperature Variability in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2) Related to the Representation of Snow Density
    Simpson, Isla R.
    Lawrence, David M.
    Swenson, Sean C.
    Hannay, Cecile
    McKinnon, Karen A.
    Truesdale, John E.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [8] Assessing the Atmospheric Response to Subgrid Surface Heterogeneity in the Single-Column Community Earth System Model, Version 2 (CESM2)
    Fowler, Megan D.
    Neale, Richard B.
    Waterman, Tyler
    Lawrence, David M.
    Dirmeyer, Paul A.
    Larson, Vincent E.
    Huang, Meng
    Simon, Jason S.
    Truesdale, John
    Chaney, Nathaniel W.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [9] Climate, Variability, and Climate Sensitivity of "Middle Atmosphere" Chemistry Configurations of the Community Earth System Model Version 2, Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model Version 6 (CESM2(WACCM6))
    Davis, N. A.
    Visioni, D.
    Garcia, R. R.
    Kinnison, D. E.
    Marsh, D. R.
    Mills, M.
    Richter, J. H.
    Tilmes, S.
    Bardeen, C. G.
    Gettelman, A.
    Glanville, A. A.
    Macmartin, D. G.
    Smith, A. K.
    Vitt, F.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [10] Analysis of secondary organic aerosol simulation bias in the Community Earth System Model (CESM2.1)
    Liu, Yaman
    Dong, Xinyi
    Wang, Minghuai
    Emmons, Louisa K.
    Liu, Yawen
    Liang, Yuan
    Li, Xiao
    Shrivastava, Manish
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2021, 21 (10) : 8003 - 8021