Classification of Rural Relative Poverty Groups and Measurement of the Influence of Land Elements: A Questionnaire-Based Analysis of 23 Poor Counties in China

被引:2
作者
Huang, Keming [1 ]
Xia, Fangzhou [1 ]
机构
[1] Renmin Univ China, Sch Publ Adm & Policy, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
land element; relative poverty; poverty group; improved decision tree; ordered logistic model; MULTIDIMENSIONAL POVERTY; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; ALLEVIATION; POLICY; VULNERABILITY; LIVELIHOODS; REDUCTION; FRAMEWORK; REFORM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/land12040918
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In 2021, China achieved an all-round victory in the fight against poverty and completed the task of eliminating absolute poverty. However, relative poverty will still exist for a long time. According to the degree of relative poverty, this paper divided rural population into four groups, incapability group, vulnerable group, marginal group and non-relative poverty group, to further explore the differences in specific land elements requirements among different groups. Firstly, ten factors were selected as evaluation indexes, including per capita household income, education level, poverty registration situation, employment situation, critical disease situation, natural disaster frequency situation, etc. By extracting 100 relative poverty group evaluation units as samples, the authors established a decision tree for rural relative poverty group evaluation based on an improved ID3 algorithm. Secondly, we quantified the effect of different land elements. Considering the resource, asset and capital function of land, this paper constructed an ordered logistic model with four groups as classification variables. The result showed that: (1) a better condition of land resource endowment leads to a lower degree of rural relative poverty; however, over-reliance on land increases the risk of relative poverty; (2) except for cultivation income and land transfer income, asset value and capital value of rural land are not evident. Suggestions are put forward: use land elements to build a long-term mechanism for rural relative poverty alleviation; improve the quantity, quality and spatial endowment of rural land resources; optimize the rural land property rights and land acquisition system; realize the market-based mechanism for rural land transfer; and implement the policy of Increase and Decrease Connection of Urban and Rural Construction Land.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Who are the world's poor? A new profile of global multidimensional poverty [J].
Aguilar, Gisela Robles ;
Sumner, Andy .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 126
[2]   Changes Over Time in Multidimensional Poverty: Methodology and Results for 34 Countries [J].
Alkire, Sabina ;
Roche, Jose Manuel ;
Vaz, Ana .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 94 :232-249
[3]   IDENTIFYING THE POOREST PEOPLE AND GROUPS: STRATEGIES USING THE GLOBAL MULTIDIMENSIONAL POVERTY INDEX [J].
Alkire, Sabina ;
Roche, Jose Manuel ;
Seth, Suman ;
Sumner, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 27 (03) :362-387
[4]   Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement [J].
Alkire, Sabina ;
Foster, James .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2011, 95 (7-8) :476-487
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CHINA LAND
[6]   Poverty, development, and environment [J].
Barbier, Edward B. .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2010, 15 :635-660
[7]  
Benjamin D., 2002, INEQUALITY WORLD, P87
[8]   Land reform, poverty reduction, and growth: Evidence from India [J].
Besley, T ;
Burgess, R .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2000, 115 (02) :389-430
[9]  
Bourguignon F., 2003, J Econ Inequal, V1, P25, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1023913831342
[10]   Land property rights and rural enterprise growth: Evidence from land titling reform in China [J].
Bu, Di ;
Liao, Yin .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2022, 157